similar to: HTML Posts

A user logged in with a captial "L" for his username: Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): cache(Loser,10.47.64.227): miss Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): shadow(Loser,10.47.64.227): lookup Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): shadow(Loser,10.47.64.227): unknown user Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): cache(Loser,10.47.64.227): miss Jul

I am writing a rails app with my colleague who wrote a lot of the tests. He had to take a leave of absence due to a death in his family, and I am needing helps with changing the model so that the tests will pass in our spec file. Here is the model: class Worker < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :first_name, :last_name has_many :writings end Here is the spec:

Dear all, I have carried out a pairwise comparison study that I want to analyze using the BradleyTerry package to establish a rank order of my stimuli. However, BT does not handle ties between stimuli, so I need to find those in my data before I can use that model. The code below goes from the format of my result file(s) to a data frame suitable for BT, but as you can see, there are some ties. I

Folks, You can''t post to this list by sending mail to ''shorewall-users-bounces@shorewall.net'' even though that''s the envelope sender address in posts from the list. Mailman 2.1 expects all traffic to that address to be DSNs (''bounce''/''delay'' nodifications from MTAs) and instead of forwarding your post to the list, it

On 17/11/2014 07:23, Ron Leach wrote: > On 16/11/2014 07:24, Robert Schetterer wrote (re-ordered): >> Am 16.11.2014 um 02:24 schrieb Reindl Harald: >> >>> * if you find a security issue in postfix running >>> on 587 over TLS cry out loud > > I'm thinking beyond that; I want to get to the position that when > there is an issue in the MTA, our

I don't see the problem with the following... the citations and baseball data work fine, but my simulated data seems to give BTm a headache. What am I missing? --- library(BradleyTerry) library(doBy) ng <- 100 players <- factor( sort( c( "jeff", "mike", "paul", "rich" ) ) ) np <- length( players ) p1 <- factor( c( rep( "jeff", ng )

Hello all, I would like to plan and analyse a study with "k" treatments (one of which is a "control"), with some binary outcome, in order to find the "best" treatment (e.g: the one with a high number of "successes"). If this was done with a fixed sample size, the analysis is well known. However, I would rather be able to "drop" treatment(s), if

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 5:14?AM Stuart Henderson <stu at spacehopper.org> wrote: > The mail admins can choose what is covered by the DKIM signature. > In the case of barclays.com there are various headers (which I think > make it through the mailing list untouched) but also the body, which > does not; a footer with the list URL is added. The real issue here is that the Mailman

Hello Everyone, ? I need to perform a sample size calculation using a drop the loser/keep the winner design. I've been searching for examples of how to do this using R but haven't found much. ? The most promising possibility thus far is an R?function called DrpLsrNRst. This appears in the book "Adaptive Design Theory and Implementation Using SAS and R". I found the function

In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one related to the other: 1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn't be exceeded? That is, even if technically possible, that I shouldn't go over? Since we're 100% NFS, we've scaled servers horizontally quite a bit. At this point, we've got servers operating as MTAs, servers doing IMAP/POP

Hi, I am new to this list, so please excuse any redundancy in my question. I have 60 Windows XP users who are tied into three Mac OSX File - Xserve file servers. There is one big problem - ... we are having issues with Excel files, that on occasion, are not being recognized, taking literally minutes to load and other quirky abnormalities. Excel on the XP desktop machines will refuse to save

On Tuesday 16 June 2009 09:48, Aaron Gray wrote: > Appently the GAS Intel backend has flaws and does not work correctly anyway > so the X86IntelAsm backend is designed only to target MASM anyway. gas Intel syntax is indeed broken in LLVM. I'd love to make it work but my work has not (yet) allocated time for that. Maybe I can hack LLVM on the weekends. :) The above discussion leads

On Jun 16, 2009, at 3:12 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 09:48, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> Appently the GAS Intel backend has flaws and does not work >> correctly anyway >> so the X86IntelAsm backend is designed only to target MASM anyway. > > gas Intel syntax is indeed broken in LLVM. I'd love to make it work > but > my work has not

I'm doing a tutorial at Astricon and the plan is to use my laptop as a demo server. Today it failed to boot and after a bit of sleuthing it turns out the fan is sticking from time to time on bootup. Apparently there is a sensor and if no spin, no go. Moving everything right now would be draconian, yet I can't take a chance on a no-boot while at the show. Does anyone know how bad a

Dear subscribers, we're sharing our latest advisory with you and would like to thank everyone who contributed in finding and solving those vulnerabilities. Feel free to join our bug bounty programs (open-xchange, dovecot, powerdns) at HackerOne. Please find patches for v2.2.36 and v2.3.4 attached, or download new version from https://dovecot.org Yours sincerely, Aki Tuomi Open-Xchange Oy

I have been dragging my feet on remote display, and have just gotten VNC going to have SOMETHING to move off the start line. But I need the 'best' for different situations, so I want to rate them. 1 to 3 where 1 is the 'best' for the catagory and 3 the loser. VNC RDESKTOP FREENX Server memory Server cpu client memory client cpu bandwidth

I had expected to be out of town this weekend so when I plans suddenly changed, I responded to a nudge from a list member and investigated means for stripping html from list posts. It turns out that MailMan 2.1 has this capability and since I run MailMan for my list server, that seemed like a good fit. After a couple false starts trying to upgrade, I think that I have it running. One thing

I'm trying to filter calls that don't have a proper ANI. This is what I did: ; only if they a real-looking ANI exten=_1XXXXXX1118/_.N.,1,Newt,1118-config ; Otherwise, send them to the loser partyline exten=_1XXXXXX1118,1,Goto(outtrunk,19096611234,1) This properly deals with null ANIs, but for some reason those with ten zeroes get matched by the first line. I also tried to be a bit more

First thing first, this isn't necessary a Dovecot related thread and using a challenge-response system like the one suggested by the initiator ("click here if you're not yet another bloody SEO guru") is plain wrong for several reasons, having said that: On 12-06-2020 11:56, Andreas Born wrote: > Am 12.06.2020 um 02:03 schrieb Ralph Seichter: >> * Andreas Born: [...]

* Andreas Born: > I meant the different stages when receiving mails over SMTP [...] I am well aware of the technical details of SMTP. Your comment is unclear to me because the OP did not make any limitations on when he wants to counter spam, so why would we artificially limit ourselves in this discussion? SMTP allows rejecting messages even after the whole body has been received (end of DATA