similar to: [Bug 3505] New: SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_WINDOW_ADJUST bottleneck

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1224 Bug ID: 1224 Summary: nft export json fails with successful return code Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1297 Bug ID: 1297 Summary: Replacement for nft export vm json? Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

I am utilizing an openssh tunnel between two Linux boxes. On the client box I issue the following commands to set up the tunnel; - ssh -w0:0 root at x.x.x.x -v where x.x.x.x is the IP address of the Linux system running sshd - ip addr add 10.0.5.1/32 peer 10.0.5.2 dev tun0 - ip link set tun0 up On the box running sshd I issue the following commands: - ip addr add 10.0.5.2/32 peer 10.0.5.1 dev

Hello All, I'm using OpenSSH 4.3p2. I'm getting few messages in my syslog and it is shown below, Aug 02 11:15:19 foo sshd[4381]: Received window adjust for non-open channel 0. I found that sshd received a SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_WINDOW_ADJUST and it executes the function channel_input_window_adjust() in channels.c. I like to know how this can happen for a non-open channel. Is anything

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2217 Bug ID: 2217 Summary: allow using _ssh._tcp SRV records Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.5p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Hello, Today I tried using "dynamically assigned" port for remote listener, by requesting listener on port 0. This is supposed to create a listener on a port choosen by server. Everything seemed OK (the choosen port was sent back to client), but forwarding was refused. So I checked the source. in channels.c, function: channel_setup_fwd_listener /* *

Recently I updated to Hardy Heron(Ubuntu beta) and with it cam openssh-client 4.7p1. In my environment we have alot of Extreme(www.extremenetworks.com) switch devices which we access via ssh. 4.7p1 would no longer allow me to connect to the switches, however 4.6p1 would. The error I received was. ' channel 0: open failed: resource shortage: Channel open failed' I did some diggin and

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8440 Summary: rsync goes interactive on missing --password-file Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: rsync-bugzilla at

I don't see a problem, my MTU is at the default value = 1500, but when I look at the trace from libssh2, packet type 4 received, => SSH_MSG_DEBUG packet type 91 received, => SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN_CONFIRMATION packet type 93 received, => SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_WINDOW_ADJUST packet type 99 received, => SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_SUCCESS packet type 98 received, => SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST packet

1) I think you should mail to: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org 2) I think that you have some miss-understood: the client and server count the window independtly. It mean: concerning data sent from client to the server: the SERVER set it initial window size and whenever he ready to get more data he sent adjust. such data can be a user command which generate a lot of output

Hi all, This is a client side only implementation of reversed dynamic (SOCKS) TCP forwarding, which means it is compatible with any existing servers have 'remote forward' capability. To establish such forward, use "ssh -R [BIND_ADDRESS:]PORT ...". The server will listen on that port and address and accept SOCKS traffics. Hope this will be useful for you. There was an

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2472 Bug ID: 2472 Summary: Add support to load additional certificates Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh-agent Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

The attached patch is against openssh-4.3_p2 to allow non-root users to vpn in over ssh. root access is still needed on client side (or an sudo solution). Currently, I have it working with an sudo command to configure a tap interface on the server side. eg to ssh into my gentoo server: # ssh -fw any:any user at ssh_server.box "sudo /etc/init.d/net.tap0 restart" Then, configure the

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcwieeBEySc My performance doesn't even come close to this even at low resolution and overclocked, and I have the 512Mb version of this card, this guy has the 256mb version and I have the same settings, i've seen people run some really high-end games on this like crysis at decent settings, (not high just decent). Does wine actually bottleneck performance on

Hi, On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 23:26:55 +0000, douxevip wrote: > So to summarize, this is the situation: > > 1) I run a fio benchmark requesting, small, random, async writes. Command is "fio --direct=1 --sync=0 --rw=randwrite --bs=4K --numjobs=1 --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --group_reporting --name=sambatest --size=32k --time_based". I run this command on both the host, as on the Samba

hi guys/gals I realize that this question must have been asked before, I sroogled and found some posts on the web on how to tweak/tune gluster, however.. What I hope is that some experts and/or devel could write a bit more, maybe compose a doc on - How to investigate and trouble gluster's speed-performance bottleneck. Why I think such a thorough guide would be important? Well.. I guess

Hi. Sometimes I see much contention in smp_tlb_shootdown while running sysbench: sysbench --test=fileio --num-threads=8 --file-test-mode=rndrd --file-total-size=3G run kern.smp.cpus: 8 FreeBSD 7.1-R CPU: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 93.8% system, 0.0% interrupt, 5.4% idle Mem: 11M Active, 2873M Inact, 282M Wired, 8K Cache, 214M Buf, 765M Free Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE

Hi David, > You're still using direct I/O with fio, which will likely disallow > client side caching with oplocks/leases. Is there a way to bypass this with settings in smb.conf at all and transform all writes to async? > I'd recommend checking that your (cifs.ko?) client is using a relatively > modern SMB2+ dialect and that leases are enabled on both sides. Yes, I

Hi, On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 19:04:47 +0000, douxevip via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I have a ZFS dataset that has sync writes disabled (setting sync=disabled) which means that it will only do async writes, and sync requests get converted to async writes. The ZFS dataset is hosted on a single Samsung 840 Pro 512GB SATA SSD. > I have this same dataset served as a Samba share, using Proxmox VE

Good Day Everybody, I am in the process of planning a phone system for a small business (15 extensions - 4 PSTN lines [to be connected by ATAs]). The plan is to install an IP Phone everywhere there is an existing computer workstation - using the same LAN for phones and computers. The layout involves workstations connected to two switches (the unmanaged 'dumb' type) and the switches