similar to: Configuration of DSL interface

Is there any linux distribution, with redundant internet connection management by ip included ? Thnx -- VETSEL Patrice Forum d''aide DEBIAN Francophone sur : http://kagou.tuxfamily.org/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

I''v finished the french translation of the QuickStart Guides named "Basic two-interface firewall" As i''v not found the email of Tom Eastep i post this news here. I''m translating now the "Standalone", and after i will do the "Three interface" If there is some french guys here, may be they can read to find some errors ?! :) cya -- VETSEL

I just bought a new cheap compaq presario sr5010nx and so far have been unable to get my dsl up and running on Centos5. pppoeconf on Ubuntu works just fine -- same machine -- same harddrive. I've run adsl-setup and system-config-network? (separately) numerous times without success. So far I suspect a missing driver but suppose it could also be a detection issue. Suggestions or workarounds

J, What i meant is...like in Linux you make use of the two external connections and collate them as mentioned in the document. Can you try keeping the Linux box in front of the two windowze boxen and collate the two LAN connections coming from them as mentioned in the HOWTO???. Trevor On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 01:28, Tesla 13 wrote: > Hello Trevor, > > Windows computer with DSL line

Hi I''m using wondershaper like script. But noticed imperfect scheduling. By googling, I found some patches that takes the aal5 atm overhead in the scheduling algorithms. http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/ADSL-optimizer/ Before trying it, has anyone tried these patches? they apply on 2.4.29 kernel and 2.6.9 TC. I use centos4 with a 2.6 kernel, so I can''t try these easily. Thanks

Hi. I am trying to setup my firewall in DomU. However, I have got a little problem. My pon dsl-provider exits with following message. Nov 18 09:44:40 alsfw01 pppd[1723]: Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded. Nov 18 09:44:40 alsfw01 pppd[1723]: Linux kernel does not support PPPoE -- are you running 2.4.x? Nov 18 09:44:40 alsfw01 pppd[1723]: Exit. I am running xen out of the box on Debian Stable. My

I have been trying to optimise my ADSL connections for VOIP. Funny things were happening - for example increasing the ping packet size by 50% had no effect, but then adding one byte had a major effect. It took me a while to figure out that I was seeing the effects of the fixed ATM cell size. This is probably obvious to some of you. For the rest: ADSL uses ATM as its transport. An ATM

Hey, I''ve been scouring the web these past few days trying to find a suitable technique to load balance my network. Unfortunately I think my setup is very uncommon, so I''m looking to you guys to see if you can help. I currently have 2 ADSL modems, provided by the same ISP and terminating on the same gateway (I think having the same gateway is what is causing the problems, since

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! when I activate wondershaper on my dsl connection (pppoa vc mux), i get three errors: # sh -x /usr/sbin/wshaper ppp0 + /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_downlink + DOWNLINK= + /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_uplink + UPLINK= + [ -z ] + cat /proc/avalanche/avsar_modem_stats + grep Connection Rate + awk {printf("%d", $8)} +

Hello. Is there any command in the shorewall script that prints how many or the hits the last 5 min? /Rickard Eriksson

Did anyone see the article? It''s the first time I really noticed that these little Linksys routers are such a fully fledged linux machine with a decent processor and a replacable firmware. I am now itching to get one to replace the multipurpose firewall desktop machine. Has anyone experimented with the current state of the firmware and how advanced you can get with tc rules? For

Anyone know if it''s possible to interleave two IP packets when using PPPoA and VC based lines? Can it be done with any PPPoE implementations? The goal is to reduce the delay when you have a high priority packet waiting, but a lower priority (large) packet already started going out ahead of this packet. I don''t want the overhead of much smaller MTU, which is the other way

From: User Lists <clopmz at yahoo.com> > Thak you for your responses. > I will use CentOS-3 as a firewall.. Nothing against CentOS as a firewall, but you might consider a distro that is more focused as a plop'n drop "security applicance" distro: http://www.ipcop.org 4-zone segmentation (WAN, DMZ, LAN, WLAN) Integrated real-time and statistical logging, Snort IDS,

Shorewall 4.5.15 3 Interface setup em1 p3p1 p4p4 ppp0 Hi, Since changing to NetworkManger on Fedora 18 I can no longer connect to the DSL Modem, which is connected to Interface em1. When the NetworkManger brings up the interfaces and ppp0, it no longer assigns an IP to em1. If I have ppp0 disabled and NetworkManger brings up the interfaces, em1 gets an IP of 192.168.1.2. Then when I get

Hello, I''m trying to get lossless VoIP traffic over my 3000k/500k ADSL line. Shaping outgoing traffic is no problem: I set total ceil for outgiong device (ppp0) to 450kbit and put VoIP into highest prio class. Even during full upload the voice is clean on the other end. Now I tried to get the same result for incoming data. I attached HTB to eth1 where the incoming voip traffic is

Hi there, how can I configure a DSL access using the command line? The Red Hat Certified Engineer Linux Study Guide does not describe this and I could not find any description on the internet. - Gergely

Hi, Does anybody else have problems like this. I'm in the UK with a 1mb ADSL service from Eclipse. I have a Draytek Vigour 2600 ADSL router. My * box is configured with a public IP address which is presented on one of the switch ports on the rear of the router. When there is some SIP activity, incoming mainly, towards my * box, the router will lockup after a short period?! I've tried

Hi. I wrote in a reply to a mail on here recently that you can''t set mpu (minimum packet unit) on HTB as you can on CBQ. I''ve just noticed that there is a patch on devik''s site which does mpu and overhead. http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ For dsl users mpu is, for practical purposes going to be 106 - overhead is still variable though, depending on packet size.

I just updated my webmin on my server and noticed that the module for Shorewall looked different. It looks like someone really cleaned it up and had it added to the Standard Webmin Module list. Woohoo. -- Joe *** I can only please one person a day. Today is not your day and tomorrow doesn''t look good either. ***

I just updated my webmin on my server and noticed that the module for Shorewall looked different. It looks like someone really cleaned it up and had it added to the Standard Webmin Module list. Woohoo. -- Joe *** I can only please one person a day. Today is not your day and tomorrow doesn''t look good either. ***