similar to: Idle connections timing out

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Idle connections timing out"

2009 Dec 01
1
Password Change from Windows machines ("You do not have permission to change your password")
Hello, I just wasted several hours trying to figure out why I could not change Samba passwords from Windows XP computers. I'm posting here so that there is some form of documentation about this on the web. My setup is basically this: - Samba 3.3.2 (running under Ubuntu 9.04) - OpenLDAP user database - Full O.S. support for OpenLDAP auth, using nsswitch and PAM. (My client
2002 Oct 10
2
multiple sessions to same destination
Hi All, I had a look in archives but no joy. I just want to know before i deploy - if there is any problem with having multiple rsync sessions from many source locations all to same destination server ( all copying to different file systems obviously ) ?? Its jusat that i see on the destination machine a process rsync -server being called whenever a client connects. Thanks ! Laurence
2002 Oct 11
4
Problem with checksum failing on large files
I'm having a problem with large files being rsync'd twice because of the checksum failing. The rsync appears to complete on the first pass, but then is done a second time (with second try successful). When some debug code was added to receiver.c, I saw that the checksum for the remote file & the temp file do not match on the first try, so (as expected) it repeats the rsync & the
2002 Sep 27
2
Rsync synchronizes unchanged files
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I wish to use rsync to synchronize a whole fat32 (MSWindows) partition mounted into a linux system. I run rsync from linux. The problem is rsync synchronizes most of the data even if the data hasn't changed since the original image was made. I used the -avz parameters to do the backup and the same for restoration. Also I've tried just -rvz. It
2010 May 28
2
setuids mount option broke
Hello, I'm trying to export a /home/ partition for multiple users, using Samba and the setuids option. My goal is to deliver emails into $HOME/.Maildir/ for each user. So I mount the share as user "root", hoping that each user will be able to use their own home directory (just like an NFS /home/ mount). (This feature depends on the Unix extensions.) I have the
2008 May 25
1
OpenSSH + chroot + SELinux = broke
Hello, First, a big thank you to the OpenSSH devs. _ /Problem Summary:/ _ Chroot and SELinux don't get along. This affects both the new (official) ChrootDirectory feature, as well as the older (3rd party) patch at http://chrootssh.sourceforge.net/. _ /History and repro:/ _ On March 21, 2008, Alexandre Rossi posted to this list with the subject: "*ChrootDirectory
2002 Sep 27
0
Server writes...?
I have a quick question about rsync's writing of files. I have a team of people that all use the host BigServer, which is running rsync as a deamon, as a central place to keep all shared files backed up. The "master copy" for any given file is considered to be the local file that somebody has worked on -- i.e., BigServer is NOT considered the master copy. BigServer is the backup
2005 Jun 16
1
RE: Setting up a routed DMZ -CLOSED
My sincere apologies to all on this list. After looking for returning packets with tcpdump and not finding ANY I called our provider to confirm our IP assignment. The IP range that I was given by my boss was incorrect. After adjusting the ip assignments, everything is working perfectly. Thank you all for your time in troubleshooting this, and I hope to be able to return the favor at some
2002 Nov 05
1
"Doh!", or: The Sync'ing Feeling I Get With Recursion
This message describes (imho) a behaviour bug in rsync. I'm going to submit a patch, but before I dive into the code I want to know what the actual desired behaviour should be. In other words, please comment. I have some directories I want to keep synchronised between two machines (call them "master" and "backup"). Every now and then someone deletes a file on
2005 Jun 16
5
Setting up a routed DMZ
Hello all, I''ve read the shorewall guides and browsed through the mailing lists, but I haven''t been able to find out if the following is possible or not using shorewall. Our provider has given us 16 IPs + 4 in a separate range for our uplink. I would like to replace that router with a Linux box running shorewall with three interfaces. I want the DMZ to be a standard, routed
2005 Jul 01
2
Citrix Help?
Hi all, Anybody has configured a Shorewall firewall to protect Citrix servers? Could you give us some clue on the rules you have to define? Citrix opens a connection from the inside to the outside from a different port (more or less like ftp) and seems not works. Regards -- Jaime Nebrera - jnebrera@eneotecnologia.com Consultor TI - ENEO Tecnologia SL Telf.- 95 455 40 62 - 619 04 55 18
2003 Apr 28
5
LineJack PSTN Out
Hi, New to the list. Just wanted to know if someone managed to get LineJack to make outgoing calls to the PSTN line in Asterisk. Any dev on this? Cheers, -P -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
2005 Jun 26
1
Re: Shorewall-users Digest, Vol 31, Issue 48
On Friday 24 June 2005 20:57, Derek Vincent wrote: >>Hello all, >> >>I have shorewall setup with 3 SNAT entries for external IP address''s to >>a single IP internal address. I am wondering how to limit access based >>on the source IP address. >>ex. >> EXT IP 1 access only to port 25 >> EXT IP 2 access only to port 443 >> EXT IP 3
2005 Jun 24
1
SNAT multiple IP to single internal IP and limiting access based on external IP
Hello all, I have shorewall setup with 3 SNAT entries for external IP address''s to a single IP internal address. I am wondering how to limit access based on the source IP address. ex. EXT IP 1 access only to port 25 EXT IP 2 access only to port 443 EXT IP 3 access only to port 80 I have the SNAT setup correctly and I have 3 accept line in the rules file (25,80,443) but I can hit
2008 May 28
2
Feature request
The sshd server has what I think is a serious flaw. There appears to be no way to turn off remote command execution. (someone please correct me if I am wrong). We have a server which uses a chroot jail, and rbash to severely limit what users can do on our system. The remote command bypasses all of that. ie. ssh user at host cat /etc/passwd will display the password file for the live system
2004 Nov 01
3
fault tolerance Internet connections
I have two Internet connections which connected to different ISP. one is for normal usage , 2nd one is for backup fault tolerance how do I implement fault tolerence multiple internet connections in shorewall ?
2013 May 14
15
[Bug 2103] New: remote command as an option in ssh_config
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2103 Bug ID: 2103 Summary: remote command as an option in ssh_config Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh
2005 Jan 03
3
colums in ''shorewall show connections'' command
I do not understand some colums in the output to ''shorewall show connections'' /root> shorewall show connections Shorewall-2.0.2f Connections at firewall - Mon Jan 3 13:12:52 PST 2005 .. tcp 6 353296 ESTABLISHED src=112.129.244.121 dst=224.81.133.205 sport=3647 dport=443 src=224.81.133.205 dst=112.129.244.121 sport=443 dport=3647 [ASSURED] use=1 I would like to know
2005 Jan 31
3
multiple pppoe connections
My Internet gateway is using ADSL PPPoE connection with dynamic public IP assigned by ISP. My Internet gateway is Redhat AS3 U2, shorewall 2.0.9 As my ISP provided 4 simultaneous pppoe dailup connection for the same physical adsl line. My linux server can be configured for multiple pppoe connection i.e. ppp0, ppp1, ppp2, ppp3 Is it possible of shorewall to assigned say ppp0''s IP is
2002 Aug 20
5
how to limit connections from certains inet subnet the best way?
Hello all, i am new to shorewall and i already have a question ;) i am running a mailserver in my dmz (or actually this will be when = evertything will be working fine with shorewall) with public ip = addresses.. i have a subnet of 8 ip addresses (255.255.255.248 mask) and = i was planning of the classic 3 nic (eth0-2) setup... the dmz should = work with proxy-arping...=20 now my quesion is