similar to: AW: IPSec pass through

Hi, Problem: I want 2 vpn tunnels for 2 subnets over one interface ipsec0. Documentation only describes config for 1 vpn or road warriors. I defined 2 vpn zones ''fre'' and ''swe''. #ZONE DISPLAY COMMENTS net Net Internet zone loc Local Local fre VPN_Fre VPN Fre swe VPN_Swe VPN Swe Interface ipsec0 is tunnel over eth1. Local is eth0. ipsec0 serves 2 zones: fre

Hi, I use shorewall on 2 computers and I''m really happy with it. But now I came over a special case where my wisdom ends. I have 2 VPNs running via FreeS/WAN on the firewall host, and now I want to replace my hand made setup with shorewall. I use the same FreeS/WAN setup as it is working already. I read through the documentation but there are only examples of 1 static net2net VPN and 3

Hello Tom, > There are a couple of outstanding questions about this on the > list and I''ll > try to address them here. Yes, that''s great. I tried myself and used the host file too. But I wasn''t bold enough to try it out since it wasn''t explicitly documented and some users here realy depend on it. Now I''ll try it and report, if I succeded

Try setting lower keyexpiry time on other endpoint. -- Eero 2016-02-09 17:04 GMT+02:00 John Cenile <jcenile1983 at gmail.com>: > Hello, > > I'm cross posting this from the OpenSwan mailing list, in case someone here > can help. > > We have two sites connected via OpenSwan 2.6.32-9 on CentOS 5, sharing 6 > /24 subnets each (so 12 in total). > > The problem

Hello, I'm cross posting this from the OpenSwan mailing list, in case someone here can help. We have two sites connected via OpenSwan 2.6.32-9 on CentOS 5, sharing 6 /24 subnets each (so 12 in total). The problem we're having is completely randomly, be it in the middle of the day, or in the middle of the night (so I don't believe it's traffic related), certain (and sometimes

Hello Lartc Mailing List: Been working on something the last week and a half and ALMOST have it working.., just need a few pointers from the wizards on this mailing list to nail it. Ok, my setup is a hub and spoke arrangement, hub is Cisco 2821 with IOS 12.4. Spokes are ruggencom RX1000 routers, Debian based with the following versions installed: rx1000test:~# uname -a Linux rx1000test

>sample setups of freeswan working with shorewall? I just implemented this a few days ago. In my case it was the simple scenario of two private subnets (with different private network numbers!) already equipped with Shorewall firewalls on which I added Freeswan. The hardest part was being patient enough for the other end''s firewall (a 486= ) to compile the patched kernel. I basically

hi, I can''t get a freeswan 2.02 ipsec x509 connection at work can somebody help me? ************************************************************************************* global situation ************************************************************************************* the linux gateway (chivas) is a single machine 192.168.1.250 with a local net 192.168.1.0/24, a dyn IP via a DSL

I''m getting insane here. I''m running shorewall 1.3.11 with iptables 1.2.5 and freeswan 1.97 on a 2.4.18-8 kernel aka MNF. The setup is a followed: Lan (192.168.1.x) - FW (eth1 192.168.1.254 - eth0 64.x.y.71) - router 64.x.y.65 (which is default GW on eth0) -internet - 161.a.b.c (FW-1) So a windows client with checkpoint tries to connect to a vpn-1 server on the internet. The

Hi Folks! I try to send a popup via "smbclient -M" from a sun (SunOS 5.8, Samba 2.0.7, hostname "sonne") to a WinXP (hostname "dezntmneubeck_x") but it fails. Both machines are in the same physical network. All I get are the following lines: root@sonne(1017)/> smbclient -s /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf -M dezntmneubeck_x added interface ip=193.102.105.71

hello, my setup is rh8 2.4.20-8, shorewall 2.0.7, freeswan-2.04. ------- policy------- vpn loc accept loc vpn accept vpn fw accept fw vpn accept --------------------- --------zone ------- net net loc local dmz dmz vpn vpn ------------------------ ----- tunnels --------- ipsec net 0.0.0.0/0 vpn ipsecnat net 0.0.0.0/0 vpn -------------------------------------- ------ interfaces

Not sure about what your client wants, but... I can confirm that *some* flash players can handle mp3 streams streamed by icecast or other stream engines - e.g. the XSPF Player : http://musicplayer.sourceforge.net/ . <xspf specific> For this one you just give the url of your mountpoint as parameter (song_url). It doesn't work if you pass it thru the xspf playlist. BTW, it doesn't

Hello all, I am configuring a vpn between freeswan and windows 2000. I am following the steps at http://www.jacco2.dds.nl/networking/win2000xp-freeswan.html, to get the VPN up and running. using this I have a ppp tunnel between windows and linux, which is inside a l2tp tunnel which is again encrypted by IPSec. (the url gives the configuration in detail and I have followed it exactly) Now the

I am attempting to create an ipsec tunnel between two CentOS 5.1 systems, network-to-network with two different 192.168.xxx.0/24 LAN segments. I have gone through the documentation on the centos web site, and have the machines to the point where the /var/log/messages show ``IPsec-SA established'' on both machines after runnig ``ifup ipsec0'' (same ipsec0 on each machine). IP

Hello, I'm having a bit of trouble connecting our current CentOS Openswan server with a Vyos server via IPSec. I've posted this on the VyOS forums, but haven't had many helpful responses, so I thought I would ask here. http://forum.vyos.net/showthread.php?tid=26504&pid=29703#pid29703 Basically our Openswan configuration is as follows: conn VYOS keyingtries=0

Hi, I''m currently using shorewall 1.3.10. I have successfully using it with one ipsec connection to remote office. Both using freeswan 1.98b and linux 2.4.19 Network A --- Gateway A --- Internet --- Gateway B --- Network B The network to network connection works fine. However, there was some problem when I use both network to network and gateway to network connection. Both ipsec

Shorewall version 2.0.3C Does anyone know where i might be able to get a RPM version of IPSEC for Linux Kernel -smp 2.4.20-31.9 ? I currently have IPSEC version 2.06 running on a Redhat Linux 9.0 box with kernel 2.4.20-6smp just fine. But whenever i attempt to upgrade the Kernel to the latest one mentioned above, IPSEC fails to startup properly and displays multiple error messages. I Checked

Helo to all, I am attempting to establish an IPSEC tunnel to a remote freeswan G/W with my laptop. My laptop sits in behind shorewall at home. From the documentation, this is what I Modified in Shorewall: /etc/shorewall/tunnels: ipsec loc 24.65.x.x /etc/shorewall/policy vpn loc ACCEPT loc vpn ACCEPT My question is, have I left anything out?

Sorry Dag, it is possible to use linux as a roadwarrior client: http://www.fw-1.de/aerasec/ng/vpn-racoon/CP-VPN1-NG-Linux-racoon-roadwarrior.html -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] Connecting CentOS to IPSEC VPN (Checkpoint FW1) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:20:55 +0200 From: carlopmart <carlopmart at gmail.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>

Hello all together, I've got here a very strange problem. I've set up a vpn with freeswan between two subnets over the internet. Now I can ping from behind to behind. With Windows 98 I can search a computer which is in the other subnet and find the the computer. But...only the other computer is NOT a samba server. Means a w2k or w98 is ok. If I'm looking for the samba in the other