similar to: Offical Shorewall Support Forum

---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Date: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 06:58:27 PM -0600 From: Aaron Axelsen <axelseaa@amadmax.com> To: shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net Cc: Subject: [Shorewall-users] Offical Shorewall Support Forum -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 DeveloperCube is a new project started by veterans of the web development industry. We are proud to announce

Greetings, I am trying to set up Wonder Shaper to work along with Shorewall 2.0.8. I have read through this document here: http://shorewall.net/traffic_shaping.htm and set the necessary options in shorewall.conf, and I coped the contents of the htb file to tcstart and changed things in accordance with the readme. Now from what im seeing, that''s all there is to it and it should work,

I just asked a question. If I was too vague, then i am sorry. I dont expect anyone to help me, but I thought that it was ok to put the question out there in case someone wanted to help me. I didnt expect abject hostility for it. Human decency was the only thing I did expect. If my question was a pain,badly formatted, or too juvinile, then i have no problem being ignored.I asked a question

I just updated my webmin on my server and noticed that the module for Shorewall looked different. It looks like someone really cleaned it up and had it added to the Standard Webmin Module list. Woohoo. -- Joe *** I can only please one person a day. Today is not your day and tomorrow doesn''t look good either. ***

I just updated my webmin on my server and noticed that the module for Shorewall looked different. It looks like someone really cleaned it up and had it added to the Standard Webmin Module list. Woohoo. -- Joe *** I can only please one person a day. Today is not your day and tomorrow doesn''t look good either. ***

I cannot for the life of my get this to work. Here is my problem: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by samba-2.2.5-10 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by samba-client-2.2.5-10 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by samba-common-2.2.5-10 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by samba-swat-2.2.5-10 I tired it with these files glibc-2.2.90-26.i386.rpm

This will be the last Shorewall release for a while as I''m going to be focusing on Documentation. In this release: 1. Empty and invalid source and destination qualifiers are now detected in the rules file. It is a good idea to use the ''shorewall check'' command before you issue a ''shorewall restart'' command be be sure that you don''t

pls could you include my name in the samba Digest mailing list, thanks Mark.

Hi! I have a Linux shorewall firewall that is the default gw of the network. I want to redirect all localy originating traffic to port 80 into another machine on port 8002 into the local network. This machine is a WIN2000 machine running a commercial software (proxy, content filtering) that only runs into Windows... :-( I tried something like this but this doesn''t seem to work: local

Hi all, I know this isnt really the right place to ask but does anyone know why when I install Red Hat 7.2 and pick Samba to be installed it doesnt seem to be (either that or its not set to auto start and I dont know how to load it). I've even upgraded from 6.1 (Samba confirmed working) and the upgrade also turns Samba or disables/uninstalls it. Anyone got any ideas on this? Thanks Ash

Hello, Any offical way to install Ubuntu (PV) as guest inside CentOS/Xen ? Most of the tutorial require us to download kernel image from third party sites. What are the correct way? Thanks. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello list, I use the livecd-creator to customize my own livecd iso. I use the kickstart config file from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CentOS/sig-core-livemedia/master/kickstarts/centos-7-livecd.cfg. #livecd-creator -v --config centos-7-livecd.cfg --cache /var/cache/livecd finally I got a iso, but the iso is strange. The offical distribution iso is

Hi all, I am trying to install oVirt 4.1.x from centos repos but it seems ovirt-engine doesn't exists. But instead, ovirt-hosted-engine-setup exists? Is ovirt-engine package removed? In the official oVirt repos, exists. Thanks.

On 13 August 2017 at 15:12, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com> wrote: > > I am trying to install oVirt 4.1.x from centos repos but it seems > ovirt-engine doesn't exists. But instead, ovirt-hosted-engine-setup > exists? > > Is ovirt-engine package removed? In the official oVirt repos, exists. oVirt engine components are not included in CentOS, only dependencies

Then, can I use both at the same time under oVirt engine host or only official oVirt repo? On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com> wrote: > On 13 August 2017 at 15:12, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I am trying to install oVirt 4.1.x from centos repos but it seems >> ovirt-engine doesn't exists. But

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:50 AM, Dario Lesca via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Il giorno dom, 19/02/2017 alle 21.17 -0700, Jeff Sadowski via samba ha > scritto: > > I was never able to build it in a way > > I have rebuild samba from rpm source on Centos 7 (samba 4.4.4) and > Fedora (samba 4.5.5) with this procedure: > > > > [lesca at dodo

I just recently became aware of MarkdownTest_1.0.3 (which discount fails, due to the behavior of code blocks changing from "leave whitespace alone except on the first line" to "leave whitespace alone", and the addition of a new kind of magic link that doesn't seem to be documented); is this the most recent version of the test suite, or is there a newer one out there?

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 10:36 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba wrote: >> >> Centos [6,7]* however does not have into current samba 4.x version >> fully support to AD DC (without rebuild the source with some few >> changes): There are changes, but they're not outrageous.

I was never able to build it in a way I feel comfortable on Fedora. I would want to build it using an RPM build process. I think I want an MIT build but I don't know what all I would need to build either way. I thought it was pretty close when I saw an MIT build in Fedora 23 with AD support. I was hoping it would have existed in Fedora Rawhide, but I still haven't seen it yet. Personally I

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Sketch <smblist at rednsx.org> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Jeff Sadowski via samba wrote: > > I was never able to build it in a way I feel comfortable on Fedora. I would >> want to build it using an RPM build process. I think I want an MIT build >> but I don't know what all I would need to build either way. I thought it >>