similar to: [Announce] Samba 4.15.0rc1 Available for Download

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.15. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.15. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.15.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.15.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects

Hello, I've recently set up Samba (4.12.3) on Arch Linux as the target for Time Machine backups for a couple of Macs. Shortly thereafter I started seeing OOMs whenever a backup would start. I stumbled upon disabling encryption on the server (i.e. changing "smb encrypt" from "required" to "off") to prevent this issue. After further digging, I'm able to

Hi, we have a situation where access to a share on some Netapp box fails with “client max protocol” set to SMB3_11 (or unset): protocol negotiation failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_NETWORK_RESPONSE With a protocol max set to SMB3_10 or SMB3_02 the login prompt is reached and subsequent file access is succeeds: negotiated dialect[SMB3_00] against server[192.168.42.42] got

Mason, You can set these also on the share. Win7 and10 client min protocol = SMB2 client max protocol = SMB3 The one for the scanner, client min protocol = NT1 client max protocol = SMB2 Part of my smbstatus -a: PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing 27316 root root

Dear all, Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet support > except in the current 4.3 release candidate. I suspect for now disabling > SMB2/3 on the Windows 10 client is your best, if not ideal, option. > > Instructions for doing.this can be found > here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2696547

Hai Philipp, DOM.AIN\foobar's password: ^^^^^^^^ No dot is allowed in the NTDOM Fix that first, then try again. Greetz, Loius > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Philipp Gesang via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 13 februari 2019 16:14 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] smbclient error

Dear Rowland, Thanks a lot for your anwswer ! Le 2017-10-17 20:16, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:31:17 +0200 > "Denis BUCHER via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : >> > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet >> > support except in the

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:42 AM qw <applemax82 at 163.com> wrote: > windows 7 supports smb3. If centos's samba server suport smb3, how to make > windows 10 support smb3 too? > > > with min_protocol=SMB3, windows 7 will use SMB3_00, while windows 10 will use SMB3_11 and everyone should be happy. -- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz

I don't have any lines in my configuration file for any of the servers, how can I tell what the default protocols are? Are the defaults controlled by samba or the kernel? Chris On 6/15/2020 2:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Christopher Wensink wrote: >> I have a handful of Linux Servers, running Centos 6.10, and 6.8 with the >> main host

On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:31:17 +0200 "\(lists\) Denis BUCHER via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : > > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet > > support except in the current 4.3 release candidate. I suspect for > > now disabling SMB2/3 on the Windows 10

Hi, I can access centos's samba via windows 7, but fail via windows 10. Why? Thanks! Regards Andrew

On 03/10/2019 20:30, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: > On 9/27/19 1:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Cox via samba >> wrote: >>> On 9/27/19 1:32 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> ....snippity... >>>> I repeat, smbclient never had anything to do with network browsing, so >>>> it is

Hi, windows 7 supports smb3. If centos's samba server suport smb3, how to make windows 10 support smb3 too? Thanks! Regards Andrew At 2019-09-13 15:47:34, "John Hodrien" <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > >> Why? This is NOT necessary for win 10 to work. I do not even know if it will >> work with

================================================================== "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." Albert Einstein ================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is is the first stable release of Samba 4.1. Samba 4.1 will be the next version

================================================================== "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." Albert Einstein ================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is is the first stable release of Samba 4.1. Samba 4.1 will be the next version

================================================================== "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." Albert Einstein ================================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is is the first stable release of Samba 4.1. Samba 4.1 will be the next version

With the new signature file I was able to verify, but there was still a bad signature: "gpg: key 0x0FC3042E345AD05D: 1 bad signature" which I highlighted below. Didn't seem to be a problem, but thought I'd point it out. I'd be glad to do additional tests if you'd like. $ gpg --list-keys /home/wink/.gnupg/pubring.kbx ----------------------------- pub