similar to: FW: Re: Open ports

On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, g wrote: > On 06/05/2015 03:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 6/5/2015 1:33 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >>> It's a desktop in an old house. >>> The outlets have ground-fault protection, >>> but the third prong is ungrounded. >> >> not sure how GFI would function at all without a valid ground, unless >> the GFI is wired

On 6/5/2015 1:33 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > It's a desktop in an old house. > The outlets have ground-fault protection, > but the third prong is ungrounded. > not sure how GFI would function at all without a valid ground, unless the GFI is wired to neutral, which is dangerous on its own. you might get a 3-prong-to-2-prong adapter and plug the PC into that, leaving the ground

I'm working on the code to handle GC tracing of "intermediate values" (as described in the GC doc), and I've run into a weird problem. (Note, this has nothing to do with the patch I have proposed, this error occurs with regular old pointer-allocas.) The exception I am getting occurs in this code here in SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp: *case* *Intrinsic*::gcroot: *if* (GFI) {

Hi, I'm having some strange issues when using cp in my rsync script. It seems there may be links breaking or something. Before running the actual rsync I run the following command in my script: cp -al /backup/Current /backup/$prevday Then I rsync from the source to /Current So shouldn't all my previous days have hard links back to the original /backup directory? Sometimes the

I can set up and access a dovecot pop3 account using outlook express fine. I can telnet into it fine. However, GFI FaxMaker is failing to log in. I assisted a client in switching his web site, including email from one server (FreeBSD) which was using Cyrus to a Redhat 4.0 server using dovecot version 0.99.11 Here's the listing of dovecot -n: dovecot -n Usage: dovecot [-F] [-c <config

Hi Talin, I think that the framework for GC assumes llvm.gcroot to be in the first block. If it is not the case in your example, it will break these assumptions. Nicolas On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm working on the code to handle GC tracing of "intermediate values" (as > described in the GC doc), and I've run into a

Recently I migrated to samba4 in my company. So far so good. debian 6 samba4.1.0pre1 bind9.9.1-P1 (working pretty well. it even updates the reverse zone and no problems at all with the forwarder) ntp-4.2.6p5 All services authenticating with samba4: mail (postfix + dovecot + squirrelmail), jabber (openfire), proxy (squid), even MS Sql server 2000, Net Support Manager and GFI Endpoint Security.

I'm trying to track down the problem with the assertion failure in SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp. This is the code: *case* *Intrinsic*::gcroot: *if* (GFI) { *const* Value *Alloca = I.getArgOperand(0); *const* Constant *TypeMap = cast<Constant>(I.getArgOperand(1)); * FrameIndexSDNode *FI = cast<FrameIndexSDNode>(getValue(Alloca).getNode());*

Hello, i use shorewall for a very long time (2 years or so) and i use it for nat and as firewall....i now use portsentrys to detect portscans but there is one problem...i use the HOWTO from the shorewall mailing list to make portsentry and shorewall work together....but there is one prob portscans get detected and a drop rule is added to shorewall for example shorewall drop 62.178.xxx.xx

Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20120425/dafc9a68/attachment.html>

Dear R users, I am trying to simulate some multitrait-multimethod models using the packages sem and psych but whatever I do to deal with models which do not converge I always get stuck and get error messages such as these: "Error in summary.sem(M1) : coefficient covariances cannot be computed" "Error in solve.default(res$hessian) : System ist f?r den Rechner singul?r: reziproke

Heya.. Yesterday someone "attacked" by box by connection to several ports.. In other words, a simple portscan.. yet, since my box has "log_in_vain" enabled, so it tries to log everything to /var/log/messages, since the logfile got full and the size went over 100K, it tried to rotate the log to save diskspace. (Apr 16 21:00:00 omikron newsyslog[32137]: logfile turned over due

Hi all, I appologise in advance if this is a little OT, but I am building a box that will serve as firewall and router for a small ''internet cafe / netcafe'' and am using CentOS... So here it is: What are the best tools to be used for keeping the potential script kiddies from ''harming the Internet'' :) ? I specifically want to be able to detect and prevent

Dear all, I met a problem while doing SEM by sem package. I got a negative chi-square of null model. Because the theoretical value of chi-square cannot be negative, I checked the source code of sem.R in sem package and I found the Chi-square of null model was computed by the following expression: result$chisqNull <- (N - 1) * (sum(diag(S %*% diag(1/diag(S)))) + log(prod(diag(S)))) I think

----- Forwarded message from Louis Kowolowski <louisk@bend.com> ----- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:37:42 -0700 From: Louis Kowolowski <louisk@bend.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: snort, postgres, bridge User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i I've been prowling through the FreeBSD and Snort list archives in search of information on setting up snort on a FreeBSD bridge(4) that logs

When searching in google I could verify that many examples of used rules in shorewall do not exist to block port scanners external. Example: nmap. Somebody has some rule or example ? thanks.

Dear Sir/Madam, Hello, and thank you for contacting eHarmony Customer Care. This is an automated response to let you know that we received your email and are working to give you a thoughtful and informative reply. Due to tremendous growth we are experiencing a high volume of inquiries. We will reply within 2-3 days. We want you to know that we are working hard to shorten this response time

Dear Sir/Madam, Hello, and thank you for contacting eHarmony Customer Care. This is an automated response to let you know that we received your email and are working to give you a thoughtful and informative reply. Due to tremendous growth we are experiencing a high volume of inquiries. We will reply within 2-3 days. We want you to know that we are working hard to shorten this response time

On 06/05/2015 03:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/5/2015 1:33 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> It's a desktop in an old house. >> The outlets have ground-fault protection, >> but the third prong is ungrounded. > > not sure how GFI would function at all without a valid ground, unless > the GFI is wired to neutral, which is dangerous on its own. very. it defeats

I have a x100p card that has call waiting on the line comming into it and then into *..... is there any way i can use call waiting on that line? Michael