similar to: Re: Bridging.

Did I just read completely past this or is this an undocumented feature? Either way, thanks. BTW for my first attempt at a Linux firewall, this proved to be a challenge, but worth it. And most of the problems I''ve had are I/O (idiot operator) errors. Keep up the good work. Kev --- Message: 10 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 06:20:00 -0800 From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> Subject:

> Kevin Smith ksmith at perfht.com wrote on Samba Digest: > Tue Apr 22 09:17:29 GMT 2003 > > > I wanted to hook my Actionlaser 1500 to my Server for the network. I sued > the newest Cups which work well with my Epson color 740. > Since I had a problem finding a driver, I considered the foomatic databases > since they did have what I needed. When I installed Foomatic (per

Sven Anderson sven_anderson at spray.se > Fri May 23 21:49:15 GMT 2003 > > > Cups must be started before smbd or vise versa. Try both. Not "vice versa". CUPS must be up and running ("lpstat -r" must be returning "scheduler is running"). This is precisely because of the described bug, which causes Samba *not* to update the list of available printers

Hi, I have a PPPoE server running on a linux box that accepts multiple PPPoE sessions from clients. I'd like to bridge each of the sessions together so that it looks like just one interface. Below is a diagram: br0 | ------------------------------- | | | | ppp0 ppp1 eth3 ppp3 I've read that anything can be bridge as long as MTU is the same.

I’ve got a problem that I have ignored for a month or 3 J I’m almost certain this is not a Shorewall problem, but I’ll share it anyway ;) I have 2 ISP connection, with load balancing. here’s some routing stuff: rama-kandra root # ip route show 202.37.230.64/26 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 202.37.230.93 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.1

I''ve got a problem that I have ignored for a month or 3 :-) I''m almost certain this is not a Shorewall problem, but I''ll share it anyway ;) I have 2 ISP connection, with load balancing. here''s some routing stuff: rama-kandra root # ip route show 202.37.230.64/26 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 202.37.230.93 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel

With kernel 2.6.13.4 linux bridge with traffic management for 4000users and 20.4 MB/s(tx)/22.4 MB/s(rx) data load of CPU is max 50% With kernel 2.6.15.1 the same linux bridge with the same traffic has 100% CPU load and in top I have ksoftirqd proccess. The machine is P4 3.2 GHz with 1GB of ram and 4 NetGear 620 cards The config is: /sbin/modprobe acenic link=0x0100,0x0100,0x0100,0x0100

Hello, I've been trying to implement a bridge in place for a clustered firewall at one of our office locations. Currently we NAT two class C's internally. We decided, for performance reasons, that it would make sense to put our servers into an official DMZ. So we started this bridging project. Our goal is to have two redundant firewalls in place. There is no need for active/active.

Hello, Where can I find a link (or docs) to *working* network config for xen 4.1.2? My tests (s. below) were not successful. Thank you in advance for any hints. Regards, Mark # --- root@xen411dom0:~# cat /etc/network/interfaces # Used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8). See the interfaces(5) manpage or # /usr/share/doc/ifupdown/examples for more information. auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto bond0

Hi all, I know, its normally a sendmail question (sendmail mailing list). But I don't want to subscribe me for this only one question. I hope, here are also many sendmail freaks ;-) many Thanks. Now my problem. We are running sendmail-8.13.8-8.el5 on a CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Box. We have to setup relaying for a person, which is connected to the internet with a dailup connection. So

Hi there, I'm currently experiencing a minor problem using the bridge module under kernel 2.4.27 part of the Devil Linux distribution (http://www.devil-linux.org). The problem I am having is that when the bridge is unloaded during a reboot I receive the following errors in /var/log/messages: Nov 14 13:22:13 src@Devil kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count =

I was given the challenge recently of creating a LAN-LAN bridge between two buildings several hundred metres from each other, using only existing Cat 3 wiring and without having to resort to an expensive and finicky 5 Ghz wireless link. I was able to create a 90 megabit link for about $3,000 Cdn with new PC's, CentOS 4.1, and the newly avaliable Black Box VDSL Ethernet Extender, which

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=339 ------- Additional Comments From scrizt@ludd.ltu.se 2006-06-26 17:57 MET ------- Is this bug forgotten ? Anyhow, I ran into it when setting up this strange network of mine.. I dont think my setup is causing anything strange however.. It appears even if no machine is connected to the "inner" port of the bridge.. I

My Internet gateway is using ADSL PPPoE connection with dynamic public IP assigned by ISP. My Internet gateway is Redhat AS3 U2, shorewall 2.0.9 As my ISP provided 4 simultaneous pppoe dailup connection for the same physical adsl line. My linux server can be configured for multiple pppoe connection i.e. ppp0, ppp1, ppp2, ppp3 Is it possible of shorewall to assigned say ppp0''s IP is

Dear CentOS, I think i found a "bug" in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth script of CentOS 5.2. i can post the my changed ifup-eth script if you want. Am I the first one with this problem? Situation: - eth2 and eth3 should be in bond1 interface - bond1 should be an interface of bridge named "iscsi" the problem is that the brctl addif command in ifup-eth gets

What's the right way to assign an IP alias to an ethernet interface that you want to bring up and down manually, not on boot? I tried the old way of making an ifcfg-eth3:0 file and it does work with the ifup, ifdown commands, but even though I specified onboot=no, it activated at boot-up. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

Hello, I'm having a problem getting two (working) NICs enslaved to a bridge to both work in the bridge. The setup is just for testing and looks like this: (NETWORK)-------|bridge|---------|test PC| I'm building a bridge from an old Dell Optiplex GX1 desktop. Using kernel-2.6.9-gentoo-r4, with bridging and ebtables compiled into the kernel; the two PCI NICs are Intel, and the e100

The ''firewall'' and ''functions'' file in CVS together produce a 30%+ speedup of ''shorewall restart'' on my firewall when compared to 1.3.11a. Please test with these files -- I don''t anticipate making any more performance changes for 1.3.12 and I want to be sure that I didn''t break anything. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall

Hi @all, I tried to setup xen 3.3 on centos 5 Update 2. I used the following packages: http://bderzhavets.blogspot.com/2008/08/install-xen-3.html The server has 4 physical network interfaces and i want to use them all. eth0 => only for host (configured with static ip) eth1 => first vm (configured with static ip) eth2 => second vm (configured with static ip) eth3 => all other vm

I have added a 4th NIC to my setup, and want to set up wireless. I have started at the configuration Tom has for the last week, and my eyes are crossing. eth0 "net" goes to my internet connected firewall with a 192.168 address eth1 "loc" goes to my switch connected to local switch also 192.168.x eth2 "work" goes to my office with a 172. address eth3 Trying to