similar to: 1.4.9 rpm update warnings

Jerry, All: Don't know what they mean, but... During install of 3.0.26a on opensuse 10.2 libGammu warning were received as follows: [root Rankin-P35a:/home/david/Documents/linux/updates/samba/samba-3.0.26a] # rpm -Uvh *.rpm warning: cifs-mount-3.0.26a-0.1.82.i586.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 414a57c3 Preparing... ###########################################

Hi to all. I previously have a working shorewall setup running under Fedora Core 3 with shorewall version 2.0.13-1 and iptables version 1.2. I simply performed an rpm -Uvh and after that I tried starting shorewall and its giving me a "cant find iptables executable". I thought I need to upgrade iptables so I upgraded to version 1.3.0 but shorewall still has the same error. I already check

I have produced RedHat 9.2.2-22 RPMS that include the ISC "delegate-only" patch that helps thwart Verisign''s wildcard .com and .net hijacking. These RPMs seem to run fine on RH9 (I''ve been running them since yesterday on ns1.shorewall.net). ftp://shorewall.net/pub/misc/ -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net

Hello all, It's my birthday today, so as my present I would like everyone possible to download and test my updated set of RPMS for Asterisk 0.7.1. By popular request, I installed and built a set of RPMS for RedHat 9.0, and in the process fixed a bunch of issues from the initial build. I have also updated and will be maintaining a page on the Asterisk Wiki located at:

I've tried both RedHat EL4 Update 7 and EL5 Update 4, both give me the same problem. 3.82 will install no problem at all : [root at rdoogan-lnx ~]# rpm -Uvh syslinux-tftpboot-3.82-1.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:syslinux-tftpboot ########################################### [100%] However, starting wth 3.83 I get the

I'm puzzled by such statements as diff /var/clamav/daily.cvd /var/clamav/daily.cvd.rpmnew Binary files /var/clamav/daily.cvd and /var/clamav/daily.cvd.rpmnew differ I thought the point of rpmnew files was so that we could check what has been changed? Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase -------------- next part

I have successfully created a packaged version of openssh that has the LPK patch. LPK allows you to store your public keys in LDAP. However when I go to install the package I created it complains about dependencies: [root at VIRTCENT13:/home/bluethundr/rpm]#rpm -Uvh openssh-5.6p1-1.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: openssh = 5.5p1-1.el5 is needed by (installed)

Sometime in Feb, yum updated something to do with ca-bundle. I didn't notice at the time, but it put these two files on my machine: /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.trust.crt.rpmnew and /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt.rpmnew Both of those on the existing system are symbolic links ca-bundle.trust.crt -> /etc/pki/ca-trust/extracted/openssl/ca-bundle-trust.crt and ca-bundle.crt ->

> Am 15.06.2018 um 01:04 schrieb Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > > On 06/14/2018 09:30 AM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Richard Grainger wrote: >> >>> I looked at the spec file in the source RPM for the krb5-libs package >>> and it it has the correct %config(noreplace) directive next to that >>> file in the

Hello, I downloaded yesterday the Red Hat 6.2 RPMs for openssl and openssh from one of the official mirrors. I could install them on a stock Red Hat 6.2 box because rpm -Uvh says (quoting from memory...): cannot install because there is dependency conflict between this rpm (openssh core) and the version of rpm and rpmlib that you are using...... In other words, the rpm packages generated

The upgrade to 5.2 creates /etc/pam.d/system-auth.rpmnew. I see that /etc/pam.d/system-auth actually is a symlink to system-auth-ac. Is it recommended to replace that symlink with the rpmnew file? Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Hi! I have a very puzzling problem : one rpm with version 1.2.5 and one with 1.3.1 (spec file does not have Epoch defined) trying to install i get this : [root at storage02 aliprod]# rpm -Uvh xrootd-alicetokenacc-1.3.1-1.el6.x86_64.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] package xrootd-alicetokenacc-1:1.2.5-1.el6.x86_64 (which is newer than

--On Friday, June 05, 2020 1:39 PM -0700 John Pierce <jhn.pierce at gmail.com> wrote: > don't most packages create a .rpmnew file if you've modified the previous > package file ? That file is created AFTER you've made edits, and reflects only the state of the file in the latest package. So it's not clear what changed from the original package that needs to be

Hi I downl;oaded the source distribution of wine 0.9.14 and compiled it as described in the readme file. I now created an rpm with checkinstall. My problem is that I can not install it, as it tells me that there is a conflict with the package desktop-file-utils-0.10-9: # rpm -Uvh wine-0.9.14-1.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file

On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: > >>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was

Hi all, I just updated lighttpd from 1.4.8 to 1.4.9 and it now refuses to start with the following error: 2006-01-24 23:12:24: (mod_fastcgi.c.989) execve failed for: public/ dispatch.fcgi No such file or directory 2006-01-24 23:12:24: (mod_fastcgi.c.1015) the fastcgi-backend public/ dispatch.fcgi failed to start: 2006-01-24 23:12:24: (mod_fastcgi.c.1019) child exited with status 2

I am experiencing a change in behaviour of my Queues in 1.4.9 vs 1.4.8. I do not pass the 'n' option to any call to Queue() in my dialplan. Yet since I upgraded to 1.4.9, I have occasionally seen this on my console: -- Nobody picked up in 20000 ms -- Exiting on time-out cycle That log message "Exiting on time-out cycle" is exclusive to the logic in app_queue meant to

I am doing an install of ocfs 1.0.12 on rh 3.0 and rpm install complains [root@xxx ocfs-1.0.12]# rpm -Uvh * error: Failed dependencies: ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-hugemem-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support >= 1.0.10 is needed by ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.12-1 where can i find ocfs-support rpm?

How am I supposed to deal with this error? # rpm -Uvh filesystem-2.2.1-3.centos.1.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:filesystem ########################################### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home: cpio: chown failed - Operation not permitted # rpm -q filesystem package filesystem is not

I'm trying to get the 2.2.6-1 src rpm for RH 7.x from samba.org compiled on RH 8.0. I built it as root with this command rpmbuild --rebuild --target i686 samba-2.2.6-1.src.rpm. Trying to install the built RPM (no errors in the build process) results in these unmet dependencies: # rpm -Uvh samba-2.2.6-1.i686.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl(fix_print_html.lib) is needed by