similar to: need help.. VPN Road Warriors

Hi All, I know this isn't really a Samba question per se but I'm looking for some samba-related advice.. :) I have a very small AD DC setup (5 users) and some end-users (read: teenargers) are now using laptops, which means they don't always have access to the network shares configured by GPO and Logon scripts from the Samba servers when they take the laptop to school. (The Samba

I have previously set up an openvpn LAN to LAN bridging VPN so I know a little about what has to happen. The gateways on either ends were running older version of shorewall that did not support openvpn directly so I just basically opened ports for it and used bridging with tap interfaces. I am no longer using that vpn link to the other house but now that i''ve upgraded I would like

Hi, I have setup a Linux + FreeS/WAN VPN firewall/gateway to provide Out-of-Office access. I have used DHCP to provide a small subnet block of Internal IPs for use by the external VPN Road Warriors, (All running XP with SSH Sentinel), on their Virtual network interfaces, and the VPN gateway performs ARP proxy on the internal interface so packets go to the right place. No NAT is performed on this

Hi, I had a look at this page which describes a single VPN zone called "vpn": http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html Is this the most current information? It is the top page found by Google for "shorewall ipsec" Is there any information about setting up multiple VPN zones for different classes of road warrior? E.g. lets say there are two classes of road warrior:

Hi all, I''ve been using Shorewall 1.42 for a month on two firewalls at work and my own personal colocated server and love it. While pretty familiar with iptables, I don''t like dealing with it on a daily basis, and Shorewall certainly makes life easier. I''ve deployed Shorewall on both our Toronto and Ottawa office firewalls, and have configured a FreeS/WAN IPSEC

Hi I have an issue with XP PRO laptop users that use their laptops to login locally on the LAN and also remotely via a VPN connection at night/weekends. After logging in remotely the next time they login locally on the LAN they experience extreme slowness with opening applications such as Word, printing and browsing print queues etc. The problem appears to be that the entry for their

Dear Madam/Sir: I downloaded the latest source file (version 3.0.1) and follow = "Manifest" guide to build the binaries, but got failure. OS: Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) Kernel: 2.4.18-3 on an i686 ***** Procedures I did to build: [max@localhost source]$ ls -l configure -rwxr-xr-x 1 max max 973150 Feb 6 10:30 configure [max@localhost source]$ ./configure :

I am attempting to utilize BackupPC on a Fedora 14 server to backup a remote client. As I understand, it's primary mechanism for finding clients is performing a nmblookup <clientname> This works fine for computers connected to the local network. My issue is extending ?Samba's? search to encompass our other network - the point-to-point VPNs Using OpenVPN, we have a number of road

Hello, I down loaded "llvm-gcc4.2-2.7-x86_64-linux" and I built Spec2006 with it. It is great and except for one benchmark the rest work fine. I want to build them with LTO now. I followed the directions in " http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html" and built ar, nm-new, and ld-new in binutils. I also built libLLVMgold.so. I get the following error: llvm-gcc: -use-gold-plugin,

On 21 July 2010 22:14, Reza Yazdani <ry.yazdani at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I down loaded "llvm-gcc4.2-2.7-x86_64-linux" and I built Spec2006 with it. > It is great and except for one benchmark the rest work fine. I want to build > them with LTO now. I followed the directions in > "http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html" and built ar, nm-new, and

Thanks for that email. The one lihe change I made is this : from #define FLAC__MAX_RICE_PARTITION_ORDER (15u) to #define FLAC__MAX_RICE_PARTITION_ORDER (6u) and that seemed to make decoder_new() happy, but it's promptly crashing after making a call to the read callback (below), then to the meta callback. The meta callback did nothing but print a string and return. I removed it, and

I changed just the FLAC__EntropyCodingMethod_PartitionedRice struct, but it hasn't changed a thing. I'm still getting the same behaviour. typedef struct { unsigned order; unsigned parameters[1 << 6]; unsigned raw_bits[1 << 6]; } FLAC__EntropyCodingMethod_PartitionedRice; Any other thoughts? Thanks, Reza Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Reza Naima

> -----Original Message----- > From: Remco Barende [mailto:asterisk@barendse.to] > Why is it bad to put a vpn server on the * box? CPU load. IPSec can be quite CPU intensive. So can asterisk. Putting two CPU-intensive, time-sensitive applications on one machine is asking for trouble. It may work, though, if you don't have too many simultaneous users. > I was considering

Hi, I have some S functions plus Fortran routines that I want to use in R. They work in S, but when I try to use "dyn.load" to link fortran codes in R , I get the following error. thanks, reza (I am using R-1.0.1 on windows NT, The name of fortran file (compiled Ratfor) is deldirld.o and it's in the D:\Reza\476\tv.gonsrc.R\ directory) >dyn.load("deldirld.o") Error in

Hi list! I'm sure the topic has been discussed but I could not find what I was looking for. What would be the best / easiest VPN software solution. I would like to install vpn software on the * server for roadwarriors to connect to with laptops running windows. Ideally the vpn solution will not require any additional software on the client side but will use IPSEC. (Ofcourse call quality

Tuomo Soini wrote: > You don''t happen to read shorewall-devel mailinglist ? I read it -- I just didn''t know what to make of your post and it arrived while I was on vacation. What exactly are you trying to accomplish that Shorewall isn''t doing for you now? e.g. /etc/shorewall/zones rw Roadwarriors Road Warriors /etc/shorewall/interfraces rw ipsec+

I've cross-compiled flac for the armv4l processor (rio receiver), and i'm trying to start up a decode thread : #include <FLAC/stream_decoder.h> .... FLAC__StreamDecoder *flac = NULL; flac = FLAC__stream_decoder_new(); if (flac == NULL) { printf("[DECODE] Unable to initalize flac object\n");

Hi Reza, -O4 is the highest level of LLVM optimization that I know of. But, I don't know if it has been tried on Spec2006. IIRC, Dan Gohman has run Spec. tests with LLVM, so he can provide more info. - fariborz On Jul 19, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Reza Yazdani wrote: > Hi, > > What are the best options to compile Spec2006 with LLVM compilers to > get the best performance numbers

On Jul 22, 2010, at 4:18 PMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote: > Hi, > > I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 > out 17 of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I > made a mistake in my build? Hi Reza. Somebody on Linux should answer, but I don't think it's normal. You may have checked out the source at a moment when it had a bug

Following is the list of fp benchmarks that fail. They all pass with -O3, but some fail with -O4. I did the test run. Thanks, Reza Estimated Estimated Base Base Base Peak Peak Peak Benchmarks Ref. Run Time Ratio Ref. Run Time Ratio -------------- ------ --------- ---------