similar to: Complex sendmail alias handling

Hi all: I have a situation where I need to change the distribution of emails for selected accounts on a regular basis. This is for the controlling of the distribution of our "support" email address. In the past I just created a "alias.bas" file to hold the bulk of our aliases and then 3 "support" alias files, alias.wkd, alias.evn and alias.wed (for weekday, evening

Sorry for the extra info required, but I had digest mode turned on and wouldn't have received the mailing till tomorrow. I have since updated the data manually, but after 'yum update tzdata' was run, the zdump -v for EST5EDT and America/New_York all still showed a date of April 1, instead of March 11. After manually fixing, it is correct. This was mostly a question about why yum

I tested moving a box from Tao 1.0 to CentOS 3.7. All went well, as far as I can tell, with the OS upgrades, but I needed to rpm -ivh --force the desktop-* stuff. This was a minor thing to fix for no real purpose other than to just be doing it. I still get, though, the Tao screens when the graphic login screen appears. I have changed the Application->Settings->Login Screen->

I read a few days back on the list where the tzdata rpm was to take care of the new DST rules. I run CentOS 3 servers, and did a 'yum update tzdata' , but received a 2006a update of the rpm. Is this proper? It sure didn't fix anything. Thanks Steve Campbell campbell at cnpapers.com Charleston Newspapers

I'm running CentOS 3 and have just installed a Liteon lightscribe DVD/CD unit. I firstly realized I didn't know exactly how to mount it, as /dev/dvd didn't exist, I didn't want to generate anything if it already existed, and I didn't want to mess up my cdrom unit that works just fine. I mounted the device though the X window just to see how it might mount, and find that it

Mr. Parsley, the main man at the Tao Linux group, has announced that he will no longer be able to do his thing for Tao Linux. Just recently, I had decided to investigate CentOS 4 before his announcement, and liked a lot of what I saw. Due to the Tao announcement, I have decided that CentOS will "have" to be the OS for my company in the future. Hence, my new membership to this list.

I have read the Wiki for the Yum stuff, and tried to pay attention to the variations for Centos 3/Centos 4 mentioned, but for the life of me, I can't seem to get the Dag repo working properly on my CentOS 3 system. I have installed the rpmforge rpm, but this doesn't seem to do much. It does create(I think it created it) the yum.repos.d folder, and I edited the Dag repos file to be

I have just noticed what appears to be a problem with my CentOS 3.7 servers shutting down. I have Netgear FA312 NICs in some of my DELL PowerEdge 700 servers and this particular NIC has WOL ability. I cannot turn this off in the BIOS or limit the error responses. When I do a "halt", the server goes only as far as closing the ethernet card and stops, resulting in a hardboot being

Hi, how to sent mail to more then one email adress here comes the part from /etc/aliases # Person who should get root's mail root: david.hlacik at polarion.com, lubomir.brychta at polarion.com which is not working. Thanks in advance! David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I should change this to OT, as it's not really CentOS related. I had a post on the list last week asking how the rpmforge rpm was to be implemented in yum. Craig White was kind enough to list how his yum.conf is appended, I assume after he installed the rpm. Unfortunately, mine is not appended with these lines. I am running CentOS 3. I will add these lines manually, and probably remove

CentOS 4.6 Hi All: Is it possible to force sendmail to use a specified host name for outbound email to a selected domain name instead of the host name that can be found by looking up the DNS entry? The problem is that we have a client that uses the same ISP as we do and the IP addresses assigned to both of us are very close. This has resulted in connection problems specifically with our

CentOS 4.8, sendmail 8.13 Hi All: I have a couple of questions regarding the routing of outgoing emails. I have spent several hours doing Google searches but I have not come close to what I am looking for. If someone can give me push in the right direction I would greatly appreciate it. We currently have three domain names (two for our development company and one for our production company). We

On 2018/10/27 21:00, centos-request at centos.org wrote: > I've previously configured sendmail to send system messages on selected > servers running CentOS 6. Usually they just kinda' work out of the box. No > problems to speak of. > > However most of my CentOS 7-servers are rather flakey when it comes to > sendmail. Most of the time they just won't send mails for

Hello. I am trying to forward the e-mails received to one address towards a php script. I am trying all I can but nothing does. I have edited my /etc/aliases file and added this line. ecard-bounce: "|/usr/bin/php /etc/smrsh/ecardbounce.php" Then, of course I do a 'newaliases'. In my /etc/smrsh I have placed the symbolic link defined above, which has been created this way: ln

Hi, how are mails forwarded, if I do have the same alias pointing to two different users like this (two entries, two lines): bon.aqua: coke bon.aqua: pepsi Will coke and pepsi get the mail adressed to bon.aqua or will only the first entry get the mail? I know, that "bon.aqua: coke, pepsi" will forward the mails to coke and pepsi, Cheers, G?tz -- G?tz Reinicke IT-Koordinator

HI, All our unix boxes under puppet are configured with the ''mailalias'' resource type as in : mailalias { "root": recipient => "linuxroot@fqdn", ensure => present } The majority of those boxes however don''t have /etc/aliases served out by puppet, rather, they simply have the installed default /etc/aliases locally.

CentOS 6 Hi All: Over the weekend I had to reboot one of my systems and got hit with fsck runs on all of the filesystems. I would not mind so much except doing them all at once took over an hour. I would like to be able to stagger these, ideally only execute one fsck per reboot. I have been able to think of two possible solutions but neither is terrific. My first idea was to manually run fsck

Am 20.07.2017 um 16:57 schrieb Valeri Galtsev: > ( and don't forget to: newaliases && postfix reload ) There is no need to reload Postfix after aliases_db changes and a newaliases. Same applies for other hashed maps refreshed by postmap. Alexander

CentOS 4.8, BIND 9.2.4 Hi All: I have a rather annoying problem with rndc which I have not been able to resolve despite much searching and many attempts to correct. When making changes to our DNS entries I have tried to use the following procedures: 1. Flush the cache buffers: rndc flush 2. Stop named: rndc stop 3. Delete the journal files: rm *.jnl 4. Edit the forward and/or

From: Les Mikesell Sent: April 21, 2015 09:19 > > Why do you care about running them at the same time when it doesn't > take longer to run them all in parallel? Except I think the root > filesystem normally runs first. So you might want to stagger it vs. > everything else. I am trying to avoid running them at the same time in an effort to avoid 70 minute boot times (which is