similar to: Bug in docu?

Hi, I''m fighting seriously with a most simple HTB setup. I''d like to share the incoming 64kbps into 5 and 59 for two different machines under NAT. HTB seems to hold the required limits when ceil is not set (no borrowing), but when borrowing enabled it seems to share equally rather then keeping the specified ratio. My setup is below. A typical output of "tc -s -d qdisc

Ok, shaping on Linux is new to me.. so bear with me if i am just stupid. curtain:/etc/shorewall# grep TC shorewall.conf | grep -v ^# TCP_FLAGS_LOG_LEVEL=info TC_ENABLED=Yes CLEAR_TC=Yes TCP_FLAGS_DISPOSITION=DROP curtain:/etc/shorewall# So it should be enabled, right? ---- tcrules ---- 1 eth0 0.0.0.0/0 all 2 eth1 0.0.0.0/0 all 2 eth2 0.0.0.0/0

Season Greetings to all Tom, in your faq, u have this noted: While I am currently using the HTB version of The Wonder Shaper (I just copied wshaper.htb to /etc/shorewall/tcstart and modified it as shown in the Wondershaper README), I treid this with wondershaper, using Bearing Leaf 1.0 stable i even changed the tc command to run_tc, and tried it in both angles, and i receive the following..

I did not subscribe to the list. I''ve been using shorewall for some time and I appreciate it very much. I think it would be useful to have an option to generate a script of the commands Shorewall is about to issue, instead of issuing the commands directly. This script could then be used for revision, modification, and could also be used on another system. I thought about modifying

Hello guys, I past the last days trying to configure my shorewall 4.06 firewall to allow openvpn bridging connection. My scenario is the following: roadwarrior (openvpn client) -------------> Internet ------------> (X.Y.W.Z - eth0) Firewall/Gateway (10.x.x.254 - eth1) --------> Local Lan -------> OpenVPN Server (10.x.x.249 - br0) where 10.x.x.0-254 is my private lan X.Y.Z.W is

I stumbled upon a problem while upgrading Ubuntu 13.04, Shorewall version from 4.4.26.1 to 4.5.16.1. Everything was working fine before, after upgrading the script wouldn''t start. First some config files. tcdevices: #INTERFACE IN-BANDWIDTH OUT-BANDWIDTH OPTIONS REDIRECTED eth1 - 6300kbit hfsc,classify ifb0 - 6300kbit hfsc

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91373 Bug ID: 91373 Summary: Nouveau fills kern.log with gigabytes of data when molecule screensaver is ran Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

Hi. I''m trying to get a traffic shaper like this: ------ VoIP pkts --> | |_| ------ \ | ---O -> ------ / Data pkts --> | ------ In this shaper voip packets are in a different queue than any other kind of packet. I want a data packet to be

Hi to all, i''m following this guide (http://www.opalsoft.net/qos/DS-28.htm), is very detailed, but i''m a bit confused about queuing disciplinse of leaf classes. In this guide the author uses PFIFO (see the scheme that i attached at message) in this way: # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:21 handle 210: pfifo lmit 10 # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:22 handle 220: pfifo lmit 10 #

Everywhere else the constant is multiplied by 16/4, so it looks like nvc0_fence_suspend/resume is buggy here. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org [3.7+] --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c index 85a0e78..4f46d8b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c +++

Version 3.0.5 with the two-devices setup (eth0 - net, eth1 - loc). Kernel 2.4.29 tcdevices, tcrules, and tcclasses are clones of the wondershaper example (http://www.shorewall.net/traffic_shaping.htm) with eth0 replacing ppp. With TC_ENABLED=Internal in shorewall.conf: ---- Validating /etc/shorewall/tcdevices... Validating /etc/shorewall/tcclasses... ERROR: device A seems not to be

I''m trying to configure 4 queues with strict priorities based on DSCP. I tried to following commands, but it seems that the filters I defined have no effect tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 4 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:0 handle 10: pfifo limit 100 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1 handle 20: pfifo limit 100 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 30: pfifo limit 100 tc

Hi, I have done this setup to give the machine 192.168.1.4 (masqueraded over dialup) the highest priority: #! /bin/bash WHAT="add" iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.1 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 192.168.1.4 -t mangle -j MARK --set-mark 4 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 root handle 1: prio bands 3 priomap 0 1 2 tc qdisc $WHAT dev ppp0 parent 1:1

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89985 Bug ID: 89985 Summary: system video hangs on video switch to fullscreen Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau

Hello ppl, I''m playing with the pfifo scheduler, its simple, and i cannot understand what''s wrong. So, i have test machine, with one interface eth0, and i want to send no more than 3 packets/sec out of that interface, so i do: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root pfifo limit 3 And i get pfifo scheduler on eth0 with limit of 3, but it sends as many packets per second as it wants, without

Hi all ! Have anyone a resource / link for documentation to configure Asterisk to act as a SIP 2 PSTN gateway (ISDN PRI) ? Thx. Regads, Andreas. -- "If you want to pray. Go to the sea." ---------------------------------------------------------------- Andreas Czerniak <cognac@amcs.net> PGPkey http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEDB224EC

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89912 Bug ID: 89912 Summary: Sometimes Nouveau hangs kernel with PGRAPH engine fault Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Hi all, I''ve not been able to find an explanation of the relationship between prio and rate as they apply to the HTB technique. Hopefully someone on here will be able to help me. As I understand things, when prio values are assigned to an HTB setup, classes with a given prio value will only be serviced when there are no packets waiting in classes with a lower prio value. Now, does

I have two (interconnected) questions: First of all, I''m trying to use IPP2P to classify my P2P traffic and give it a lower network priority. I''ve already successfully built IPP2P into iptables and the kernel. I read http://www.shorewall.net/IPP2P.html, but it''s confusing me. Using the documentation for normal tcrules in 3.0

Do somebody know where to find a real good documentation for the observe_form? I have some problems with it and find nowhere a documentation. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.