similar to: Upgrade from Hell

hi All, Ubuntu 12.04 and glusterfs 3.3.1. root at tipper:/data# df -h /data Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on tipper:/data 2.0T 407G 1.6T 20% /data root at tipper:/data# du -sh . 10G . root at tipper:/data# du -sh /data 13G /data It's quite confused. I also tried to free up the space by stopping the machine (actually LXC VM) with no lock. After umounting the space

Hello ! I have a performance issue with Kernel 2.6.X and policy match support as suggested in http://shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html. My IPSEC performance doesn''t exeed about 30kbyte/sec even if my downlink is 1024kbit/sec and should reach more than 100kbyte/sec. No, its not the cpu''s performance (AMD Barton 2500+) and no it''s not the gateway (CELERON 600 Mhz) on the

On 18 December 2017 at 16:20, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > > > Even this looks wrong, I would expect something like this: > > Dec 18 07:43:59 dc3 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.0.111 from > cc:4e:ec:e9:c8:d3 via eth0 > Dec 18 07:43:59 dc3 dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.0.111 to cc:4e:ec:e9:c8:d3 > via eth0 > Dec 18 07:47:33 dc3 dhcpd:

Hello there. So, I have a Samba AD setup, with DHCP and samba_dlz setup as described in the wiki. However, I find that after a while, dynamic DHCPD updates stop working. The fix is for me to restart the named server. When in this state, I get log messages like: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.52.232 (192.168.60.2) from 8c:be:be:0d:cf:3c (RedmiNote4-Gj?gur) via 192.168.52.253 Dec 18 15:39:44 dc02

Hi all, I needed to have a kind of MAC support for rule servers as I do DNAT to hosts that are served by a DHCP server. So I did the following : When Shorewall script find a MAC address as a server, it tries to get his IP thru the arp table and then "resolve" the ARP address to the IP address of the client. Of course the main limitation of this is that you''ll have to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13266 Bug ID: 13266 Summary: Writing of files to Apple's new "AP" controller model SSD's takes 4x longer. Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5

Is it me, or is my USB not being recognized properly? tipper nut # ./tripplite_usb -DDD -u root -a tipper -x vendor=09AE Network UPS Tools - Tripp Lite OMNIVS and SMARTPRO driver 0.6 (2.0.4) Warning: This is an experimental driver. Some features may not function correctly. debug level is '3' Checking device (0000/0000) (002/001) - VendorID: 0000 - ProductID: 0000 - Manufacturer: Linux

Hi, it seems not to be possible to add more than one host at once to a zone. So shorewall add br0:eth0:192.168.2.10,eth0:192.168.2.11 work fails, since "br0:eth0:192.168.2.10,eth0" is interpreted as one interface. --snip -- iptables v1.2.9: interface name `eth0:192.168.2.10,eth0'' must be shorter than IFNAMSIZ (15) Try `iptables -h'' or ''iptables

Here's a question for ecologists on the r-help list-- I'm addressing this to ecologists in particular because they're most likely to be familiar with the equation in question but I'll be happy to discuss the problem with anyone who's willing to take a whack at it. I'm trying to write a function to calculate the large sample variance of species richness estimates by

Hi, as per the shorewall MultiISP documentation ( http://www1.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html ), it says "Use of this feature requires that your kernel and iptables include CONNMARK target and connmark match support (Warning: Standard Debian™ and Ubuntu™ kernels are lacking that support!)." it means MultiISP wont work properly if i am using Ubuntu server. if yes whats the

Please excuse my ignorance as I''m a linux newbie. Basically I have a setup of an adsl ethernet modem (nated and then everything forwarded to the external ip of my Mandrake mnf firewall) connected to the mnf firewall which then connects to the lan. internet <--> adsl modem <--> mnf firewall <--> lan There''s only 2 nics in the mnf firewall so it''s a

I think it would be nice to be able to rate limit an action, too.. suppose I have an action named Accept_good_source : ACCEPT - - tcp - 1024:65535 ACCEPT - - udp - 1024:65535 and that i want to use it in an action called AllowCVS, i can''t limit the cvs usage, but only the general use of Accept_good_source... same goes for userset... as each rule will give one iptables command, I

Group, I am reading about tc (traffic control) and willing to get my feet wet. As requirement, there should be HTB compiled in the kernel. I grabbed a Mandrake 8.2 distro, and didn''t installed the kernel source. Anyone knows if the HTB is compiled in Mandrake 8.2, or point a way to find that out? I tried to read the /usr/src/kernel.xxxxx/.config file, but it doesn''t exists.

Hi I am looking at converting a Linux terminal server box to iptables using Shorewall 2.0. (At the moment it uses ipchains). The server currently has scripts which are called as each user logs in which run a series of "ipchains" commands to set the access rights for that user (and again to cancel them when the user logs out). My plan is to replace these scripts with ones that call

Hi I have recently reconfigured my system to a Bridge based architecture on the basis that I have an ADSL Modem/Router with a Public address on the Wan side and a Private address on the Lan side. I am running a Debian based system kernel 2.6.7 and the Bridging software is installed and working correctly, including startup etc. The problem that I have is in "shorewall start" The

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 claas@rootdir.de wrote: > Hello, > > > I am trying to get ipsec with kernel 2.6.8.1 and shorewall 2.1.9 running, > but I still have a problem: > > Validating hosts file... > Error: Your kernel and/or iptables does not not support policy match: ipsec > > I had a look for netfilter patch-o-matic, but I did not find the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Over the past weekend, I added SPF screening on the MTA at shorewall.net. SPF is a mechanism for a domain to use DNS to publish a list of those IP addresses that are used to send legitimate email from that domain. A receiving MTA can use that published information to determine if email from a domain is being sent through an MTA belonging to that

As suggested here: http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2004-October/015097.html I''ve run: adam@shrike:~$ /sbin/iptables -m policy --help iptables v1.2.11 Usage: iptables -[AD] chain rule-specification [options] iptables -[RI] chain rulenum rule-specification [options] iptables -D chain rulenum [options] --snip-- And: adam@shrike:~$ sudo

>From a diff of my current shorewall firewall script with the new one from the CVS today : $ diff -w /usr/share/shorewall/firewall /usr/src/shorewall/s/firewall [...] 673c910 < for network in $networks; do --- > for networks in $networks; do I don''t think that "for networks in $networks" works well. -- -IAN! Ian! D. Allen Ottawa, Ontario,

Hello, I''m using Gentoo Linux amd64 with the 2.6.34-xen-r4 kernel from portage. I''ve been successfully using Xen 4.0 for almost a year, but now it seems that with the dawn of Xen 4.1, the package maintainers have forces unstable users to upgrade from 4.0 to 4.1 Looking forward to try the new xl interface, I installed it, but there seem to be a few problems with xen-4.1 First