similar to: rounding change

Hi Ivan, The code that we have is indeed different from what the 'standard llvm' expects. Let me explain: in our version we came into this situation in two steps: 1) I added support for 'special types' that map directly to types supported by hardware. These types are represented by a struct containing a single iXXX member, providing the necessary bits of the type, and at the

On 2020-02-28, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: >Nice! > >Your plan sounds great, and it'll be awesome to finally have a good MachO >LLD available. > >On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:32 PM Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev < >llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We’re planning to contribute a new implementation of LLD for Mach-O, using

Thanks Jon. Actually I tried “x86_64-linux”, but it makes the test “Unsupported” from my linux machine, and it was because my test is under clang, not llvm. It seems that clang doesn’t support “x86_64-linux” yet. Thanks again! Best, Taewook On 3/3/17, 10:57 AM, "Jonathan Roelofs" <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: On 3/3/17 11:46 AM, Taewook Oh via llvm-dev

It is $target dependent. I’m curious what makes you think it is $host dependent. Thanks, Taewook On 3/3/17, 5:10 PM, "Jonathan Roelofs" <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: On 3/3/17 12:23 PM, Taewook Oh wrote: > Thanks Jon. Actually I tried “x86_64-linux”, but it makes the test “Unsupported” from my linux machine, and it was because my test is under

>>>>> Duncan Murdoch >>>>> on Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:48:26 -0500 writes: > On 10/11/2019 9:17 a.m., Bryan Hanson wrote: >> >> >>> On Nov 10, 2019, at 3:36 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> Gabriel Becker

Hi, I have a question about the current definition of TBAA (See [1]). In the LLVM-IR code that we produce, we generate load/stores of struct types. (See [2] and [3] for a godbolt example showing the issue) For following c-alike code: struct S { int dummy; short e, f; } x,y; struct S* p = &x; int foobar() { x.f=42; *p=y; //**** struct copy return x.f; } We produce:

Hi all, In the help of strsplit one can read split character vector (or object which can be coerced to such) containing regular expression<http://127.0.0.1:39783/help/library/base/help/regular%20expression>(s) (unless fixed = TRUE) to use for splitting. If empty matches occur, in particular if split has length 0, x is split into single characters. Ifsplit has length greater than 1, it is

R core team - It took far, far longer than I anticipated, but I have finally finished the next release of the survival code. Primary changes 1. The source has been migrated to Rforge. This will now be the primary source. I've used SCCS -> rcs -> cvs and now svn. Further changes will be someone else's problem. I expect that maintaince will now begin to migrate to a larger

Hello, I wonder if I can write a test that runs only on Linux. I was thinking of adding “REQUIRES” to the test, but couldn’t find a feature name for Linux (if one exists). Thanks! Best, Taewook -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170303/807b40ac/attachment-0001.html>

Hi! We?ve recently come across an example where a package (minqa) creates an Rcpp Function object in a static variable. This causes R_ReleaseObject to be called by the destructor at a very late point in time - as part of the system exit function: static Function cf("c"); I?m wondering if that is considered to be ?safe?? Is the R engine supposed to stay in a state where calls to API

Hi guys We recently upgraded our Samba clusters from 4.7.5 to 4.8.3 and noticed a difference in behavior for winbind. The situation is as follows Assume we have a local Linux user XYZ (UID 519) as well as a AD user object XYZ (UID 30001).     idmap config * : backend = tdb2     idmap config * : range = 30000-50000 In our share definitions we regularly use the "force user"

Dear Martin, What's the ETA for _R_CLASS_MATRIX_ARRAY_=TRUE to become the new unconditional behavior in R devel? Thanks! H. On 11/21/19 08:57, Martin Maechler wrote: > > TLDR: This is quite technical, still somewhat important: > 1) R 4.0.0 will become a bit more coherent: a matrix is an array > 2) Your package (or one you use) may be affected. > >

Hello everyone. This is a question regarding generation of the concordance index (c index) in R using the function rcorr.cens. In particular about interpretation of its direction and form of the 'predictor'. One of the arguments is a "numeric predictor variable" ( presumably this is just a *single* predictor variable). Say this variable takes numeric values.... Am I

Dear all, As I said in my previous email I have just upgraded to R 2.14.0 on Windows 7. I have just run the 'coxph' function and notice that a Concordance statistic is produced. Is there any way to extract this information from the output? E.g. can I call the concordance value independently of calling the output? Many thanks, Laura [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear All, I am new to R and am trying to learn how to create functions using R. Below is code which calculates Lin's Concordance Coefficient. After I calculate the coefficient I want to create a scatter plot which annotates the coefficient along with preceding text onto the plot. The below code doesn't seem to work. If I use only the object 'lincc' on the text command it works

Running Feora 25 workstation we're able to register the computer in AD but I can't get SSH to authenticate properly. wbinfo -u brings back all the users. Just getting "Permission denied, please try again." Below are key settings in related conf files. rpm -q samba samba-4.5.8-1.fc25.x86_64 winbindd -V Version 4.5.8 /etc/nsswitch.conf: passwd: files winbind shadow:

Hi. I have data which i would want to assess the degree of agreement between two assays, e.g., to evaluate reproducibility or for inter-rater reliability. I have used the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It looks good ranginging between 0.90 to 0.998. Though this looks good. I am told the Concordance correlation coefficient will give a better picture of how reproducible the assay

Hello group, my question is deciding what test would be appropriate for following question. An experiment 'A' yielded 3200 observations of which 431 are significant. Similarly, using same method, another experiment 'B' on a different population yielded 2541 observations of which 260 are significant. There are 180 observations that are common between significant observations of A

Dear I estimate a sample selection model using the Clayton copula and Burr and Gaussian marginal. I need to derive ther Kendall'sw tau from the concordance coefficient by integration. I came across a way to do that in R long time ago but cannot find it again. Can somewone tell me what to read and what to use? Thank you. Steven Yen

On 11/11/19 01:40, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Duncan Murdoch >>>>>> on Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:48:26 -0500 writes: > > > On 10/11/2019 9:17 a.m., Bryan Hanson wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On Nov 10, 2019, at 3:36 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > >>> >