similar to: Mitigating Stalls Caused by Call Deparse on Error

Luke, thanks for considering the issue.? I would like to try to separate the problem into two parts, as I _think_ your comments address primarily part 2 below: 1. How can we avoid significant and possibly crippling ?? stalls on error with these non-standard calls. 2. What is the best way to view these non-standard calls. I agree that issue 2. requires further thought and discussion under a

We also have a few other suggestions and wishes about backtrace storage and display on the one hand, and display of constructed calls on the other hand. Perhaps it would be better to open a different wishlist item for traceback() to keep the discussions focused? FWIW I think deparsing backtraces lazily is a great idea. Displaying 1 line per call by default in interactive sessions, while being

This is probably best viewed in the context of other issue with displaying calls, such as issues arising from calls constructed in non-standard evaluation contexts. Might be good to move to a wishlist item in bugzilla. Best, luke On Sat, 13 Jul 2019, brodie gaslam via R-devel wrote: > When large calls cause errors R may stall for extended periods.? This > is particularly likely to happen

Better to add this to the wishlist item. This all needs to be looked at together, and nothing is likely to happen until after vacation/conference season. It will disappear from everyone's radar if it is just in R_devel. Best, luke On Sun, 14 Jul 2019, brodie gaslam wrote: > Luke, thanks for considering the issue.? I would like to > try to separate the problem into two parts, as I

Dear R-devel, I found this behavior disturbing, if `1 + f()` is called, `sys.call()` called inside of `f` will return a quoted `f()` with a "srcref" that prints "1 + f()". I don't know which one is good but I don't think they can be correct at the same time. Here's a reproducible example: f <- function(){ sc <- sys.call() print(sc) attr(sc,

Hi r-devel, The R_ParseVector has been changed in R-2.5.0, and there is a simple description about the 4th argument at http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/NEWS, it says that: "R_ParseVector() has a new 4th argument 'SEXP srcfile' allowing source references to be attached to the returned expression list. " I do not quite understand the purpose of adding the 4th argument. Would

I have just committed some changes to R-devel (which will become R 2.5.0 next spring) to add source references to parsed R code. Here's a description of the scheme: The design is done through 2 old-style classes. "srcfile" corresponds to a source file: it contains a filename, the working directory in which that filename is to be interpreted, the last modified timestamp of the

I have been trying to write my own user defined function in Rpart.I imitated the anova splitting rule which is given as an example.In the work I am doing ,I am calculating the concentration index(ci) ,which is in between -1 and +1.So my deviance is given by abs(ci)*(1-abs(ci)).Now when I run rpart incorporating this user defined function i get the following error message: Error in

The deparse options used by default by 'deparse' and 'dput' are c("keepNA", "keepInteger", "niceNames", "showAttributes") but Defn.h still has #define DEFAULTDEPARSE 1089 /* KEEPINTEGER | KEEPNA | NICE_NAMES, used for calls */ i.e., with the SHOWATTRIBUTES bit turned off. Is that on purpose? Note that this leads to weird

Hello, I submit a patch for review that implements code coverage tracing in the R interpreter. It records the lines that are actually executed and their associated frequency for which srcref information is available. I perfectly understands that this patch will not make its way inside R as it is, that they are many concerns of stability, compatibility, maintenance and so on. I would like to have

Hi all, I'm working on a GUI frontend for R, and I'm looking for a good way to catch all warning- and error-output. The reason for this is mostly, that I would like to know, which sections of the output are "normal" output, warnings, and errors. This would allow for some nice features, such as highlighting warnings and errors in a different color, or popping up a message

Hi, The result of as,character() on 'srcref' objects doesn't have the closing ')' in some cases involving 'quote': > e4 <- quote({2+2}) > class(attr(e4, "wholeSrcref")) [1] "srcref" > as.character(attr(e4, "wholeSrcref")) [1] "e4 <- quote({2+2}" As a result printing the object also lacks it and gives an

I noticed the following file descriptor leak when I couldn't remove a package unless I shut down the R session that had loaded and used it. The function that triggered the problem printed the output of a call to parse(). Each time one prints a srcref a connection is opened and not closed. It looks like it happens in as.character.srcref's call to getSrcLines, which has some logic I

Hi everyone: I?m one of the interns at RStudio this summer working on a project that helps teachers grade student code. I found an unexpected behaviour with the |==| operator when comparing |quote|d expressions. Example 1: |u <- quote(tidyr::gather(key = key, value = value, new_sp_m014:newrel_f65, na.rm = TRUE)) s <- quote(tidyr::gather(key = key, value = value,

Hello, Consider this file (/tmp/test.R) : <file> f <- function( x, y = 2 ){ z <- x + y print( z ) } </file> I get this in R 2.7.2 : > p <- parse( "/tmp/test.R" ) > str( attr( p, "srcref" ) ) List of 1 $ :Class 'srcref' atomic [1:4] 1 1 4 1 .. ..- attr(*, "srcfile")=Class 'srcfile' length 4 <environment>

Hi, on R version 2.15.1 (2012-06-22) (Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu (32-bit)) sourced functions have srcref attached as an attribute. Are such data also available for S4 generics and methods? How? (See sample code below) Thank you. Bests, Renaud f <- textConnection( " f <- function(){} setGeneric('myfun', function(x, ...) standardGeneric('myfun'))

Specifically, the srcfile attribute of the srcref attribute of the two instances of the functions contain different environments, AFAICT. Environments are compared only by exact pointer, so this forces return FALSE. Snippets from .Internal(inspect(x)) and .Internal(inspect(y)): @cca008 03 CLOSXP g0c0 [MARK,NAM(2),ATT] FORMALS: @604b58 00 NILSXP g0c0 [MARK,NAM(2)] BODY: @cc9650 06 LANGSXP

Dear R developers, this mail is basically a summary / clarification of some previous mails I sent to this list last week (subject "Catching warning and error output"). Duncan Murdoch pointed out that these were badly organized, and suggested I repost, collecting the main points previously spread out between several mails. Problem statement: In an application embedding R, I would

For documentation we use a system that generates Rd files from special comments in the code. (inlinedocs). It is crucial to be able to get the defining source code for objects like methods to extract the comments from it. Here is an R session that shows how this works for several kinds of methods and (at the end of the session) how if fails for methods of "initialize" >

Yea I am aware of this. This is because the Ubuntu binary has stack smashing detection enabled. It's possible to build R without this checking: export CFLAGS="-fno-stack-protector" I have not been able to figure out why stack smashing is detected. I'm cc'ing this to r-devel in case anyone else has an idea. Michael On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Felix Andrews