similar to: "utils::file.edit" does not understand "editor" with additional arguments

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Sublime HQ Pty Ltd* <sales at sublimetext.com> Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 Subject: Sublime Text License Key To: "opticalphoenix at gmail.com" <opticalphoenix at gmail.com> Hello, Thanks for purchasing a copy of Sublime Text! Your license key is: ----- BEGIN LICENSE ----- Dennis Wright Jr Single User License EA7E-819939

Finally, a decent TextMate like Multi-platform (including Windows) Editor. It is the Sublime Text Editor http://www.sublimetext.com/ Take a look! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this

The company making sublime text gets few thousands of dollars of notional loss :) On Oct 5, 2015 8:45 PM, "Steve Howes" <steve-lists at geekinter.net> wrote: > Wonder what happens when an entire mailing list tries to use that key?... > > On 05/10/15 15:28, Optical Phoenix wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Sublime HQ Pty Ltd* <sales at

Hey Eli, On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > Hello, > > While investigating one of the existing tests > (test/CodeGen/X86/tailcallpic2.ll), I ran into IR that produces some > interesting code. The IR is very straightforward: > > define protected fastcc i32 @tailcallee(i32 %a1, i32 %a2, i32 %a3, i32 > %a4) { > entry: >

Hello, While investigating one of the existing tests (test/CodeGen/X86/tailcallpic2.ll), I ran into IR that produces some interesting code. The IR is very straightforward: define protected fastcc i32 @tailcallee(i32 %a1, i32 %a2, i32 %a3, i32 %a4) { entry: ret i32 %a3 } define fastcc i32 @tailcaller(i32 %in1, i32 %in2) { entry: %tmp11 = tail call fastcc i32 @tailcallee( i32 %in1, i32 %in2, i32

Running on x86-64 linux: FAIL: test/CodeGen/X86/vec_ins_extract.ll Failed with exit(1) at line 1 while running: llvm-as < test/CodeGen/X86/vec_ins_extract.ll | opt -scalarrepl -instcombine | llc -march=x86 -mcpu=yonah | not grep sub.*esp subl $16, %esp subl $16, %esp subl $16, %esp subl $16, %esp child process exited abnormally FAIL:

>> While investigating one of the existing tests >> (test/CodeGen/X86/tailcallpic2.ll), I ran into IR that produces some >> interesting code. The IR is very straightforward: >> >> define protected fastcc i32 @tailcallee(i32 %a1, i32 %a2, i32 %a3, i32 >> %a4) { >> entry: >> ret i32 %a3 >> } >> >> define fastcc i32 @tailcaller(i32

At 11:40 AM 11/14/2001 -0500, sublime@mac.com wrote: >the ACG function that the compressor provides is limited at best. its >adjustment is way too audible to make full use of it in balancing levels. >yes, it is last in the chain. i'm just wondering if there's anything out >there in the way of software. if a minidisc recorder can do it, why can't a >$1000 pc? tons of

Hi Changcheng, Below is an example took from test/CodeGen/X86/add.ll: define i32 @test1(i32 inreg %a) nounwind { %b = add i32 %a, 128 ret i32 %b ; X32: subl $-128, %eax ; X64: subl $-128, } 1. The first step, you write a function by using LLVM IR. define i32 @test1(i32 inreg %a) nounwind { %b = add i32 %a, 128 ret i32 %b } This will be left to LLVM toolchain to generate

When you enable -tailcallopt you get support for tail calls between functions with arbitrary stack space requirements. That means the calling convention has to change slightly. E.g the callee is responsible for removing it's arguments of the stack. The caller cannot transitively know the tail callee's tailcallee's requirement. Also care must be taken to make sure the stack stays

> > FastCC use to be caller pops arguments so there was no stack > > adjustment after the > > call to qux. Now FastCC has callee pops arguments on return semantics > > so the > > x86 backend inserts a stack adjustment after the call. > > > > _array: > > subl $12, %esp > > movss LCPI1_0, %xmm0 > > mulss

Hi Arnold, Thanks for the insights. My comments below: On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote: > When you enable -tailcallopt you get support for tail calls between functions with arbitrary stack space requirements. That means the calling convention has to change slightly. E.g the callee is responsible for removing it's arguments of

Hi Dale, yes it's just stack alignment. Unfortunately your patch doesn't make any difference. Thanks for thinking about this, Duncan. On Friday 27 June 2008 19:51:00 Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:11 AMPDT, Duncan Sands wrote: > > FAIL: test/CodeGen/X86/vec_shuffle-10.ll > > Failed with exit(1) at line 3 > > while running: llvm-as <

On Sep 24, 2007, at 2:25 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > > On 24 Sep 2007, at 09:18, Evan Cheng wrote: >> +; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86 -mattr=+sse2 -stats -info- >> output-file - | grep asm-printer | grep 9 >> +; change preceeding line form ... | grep 8 to ..| grep 9 since >> +; with new fastcc has std call semantics causing a stack adjustment >>

Hi, I have a dynamically loaded llvm pass built in-tree with ninja (generated with cmake, basically a copy of the hallo pass plugin, linux, llvm/clang version 6.0.1). It uses the ExecutionEngine. Building it without linking against LLVMExecutionEngine library results in an undefined symbol to the vtable of the EngineBuilder when loaded to opt. Linking the plugin with LLVMExecutionEngine results in

Hi! I have R 1.9.1, Mac OS X 10.3.5, GNU Emacs 21.2.1 and ESS 5.2.3. I installed today the ESS by not changing ess-site.el, but creating .emacs in $home with the single line: $ cat ~/.emacs (load "/usr/local/lib/ess-5.2.3/lisp/ess-site") If I start now emacs and then R (with M-x R) then I get: > options(STERM='iESS', editor='emacsclient') but using fix() oder

On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:11 AMPDT, Duncan Sands wrote: > FAIL: test/CodeGen/X86/vec_shuffle-10.ll > Failed with exit(1) at line 3 > while running: llvm-as < test/CodeGen/X86/vec_shuffle-10.ll | llc - > march=x86 -mattr=+sse2 | not grep {sub.*esp} > subl $16, %esp > subl $16, %esp > child process exited abnormally Is the code actually loading and storing

On 24 Sep 2007, at 09:18, Evan Cheng wrote: > +; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86 -mattr=+sse2 -stats -info- > output-file - | grep asm-printer | grep 9 > +; change preceeding line form ... | grep 8 to ..| grep 9 since > +; with new fastcc has std call semantics causing a stack adjustment > +; after the function call > > Not sure if I understand this. Can you illustrate

Hi, I recently discovered Markdown, and I'm currently using it to write some documentation for CentOS 7. https://github.com/kikinovak/formation-linux For the time being, I'm using my good old Vim editor for writing it. I turned off syntax highlighting, since this produces random results with Markdown. Pages are correctly displayed on Github, but in order to see them, I have to push

Could I please, pretty please, with whipped cream and a cherry on top, be given the privilege to alter the most exalted and sublime of pages, the Arabic wiki? :) I'm still pumped up about this and I'm planning on staying pumped up about this for quite some time.