similar to: CRAN incoming queue closed from Sep 1 to Sep 9

Dear package developers, the CRAN submission queue closes and will be offline from Dec 22 to Jan 3 due to CRAN team vacations and maintainance work on the CRAN check farm. Best, Uwe Ligges

Hello, The CRAN checks for the drake package (4.1.0) fail for r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang. This happened right when crayon 1.3.4 was released, but I suspect the problem is not with crayon or drake, but with base R-devel. I cannot reproduce the error myself, but I have copied a minimal working example (MWE) below that should theoretically isolate the problem. `find_namespaced_functions()`

--- On Mon, 1/17/11, Raymond Wong <raywong365@yahoo.ca> wrote: From: Raymond Wong <raywong365@yahoo.ca> Subject: Re: [R] help in calculating ar on ranked vector To: "Uwe Ligges" <ligges@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> Received: Monday, January 17, 2011, 11:56 AM Thanks Uwe:   Here is my code. the first set of print statements work, but not the second.   #

2017-06-22 20:31 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: > > > On 22.06.2017 20:09, I?aki ?car wrote: >> >> 2017-06-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: >>> >>> On 22.06.2017 17:11, Bernd Funovits wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I

Kurt, Uwe suggested I write to you as maintainer of chron ... at the start of is.weekend, in the check on the argument type, maybe just change chron() to as.chron()? This would ensure as.chron.POSIXt gets called on POSIXt arguments, and (I think) fixes the problem. I tested and it seems ok. No warning/error required. > is.weekend function(x) { if(!inherits(x, "dates"))

Hi David, ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Smith" <davidsmi at microsoft.com> > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>, "Uwe Ligges" <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>, "Elliot Waingold" > <Elliot.Waingold at microsoft.com> > Cc: "R-devel at r-project.org" <r-devel at r-project.org>

Here's a fairly minimal-case example in which the saved EPS does not match the screen. The error comes when using bquote(.(i)) instead of bquote(1), as demonstrated by the two minimally different cases below. Very strange. Any clues as to why? #---------------- begin ------------------- # Version A. X axis labels have subscripts as constants. EPS is correct. windows() layout( matrix( 1:2 ,

In order not to forget it (I have not got any answer so far) ... Uwe Ligges -------- Original Message -------- Subject: plotmath in underlined style; was: Re: [R] Underline in expression(). Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:50:02 +0200 From: Uwe Ligges <ligges@statistik.uni-dortmund.de> Organization: Fachbereich Statistik, Universitaet Dortmund To: John Janmaat <jajanmaat@netscape.net>,

On 26.04.2015 13:23, William Revelle wrote: > This still seems to be the case. > > I tried uploading the most recent version of psych and got as far as the Step 3 page which says that it has sent out an email. > However, although normally this step takes agout 1 minute, nothing has happened for 16 hours. > > Should we just use the old system of uploading to the ftp site and

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org> > To: "Uwe Ligges" <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> > Cc: "R-devel at r-project.org" <r-devel at r-project.org> > Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 4:02:54 PM > Subject: Re: [Rd] download.file() on ftp URL fails in windows with default download method

[Resend the stuff below since initial one has been blocked from R-help.] I have moved the "old" Matrix_0.98-7.zip to the main repository for the meantime. Best, Uwe Ligges -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [R] no package 'Matrix' at the repositories Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:45:19 +0100 From: Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de> Organization:

The Free Software Foundation maintains a list of free and GPL-compatible software licenses here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#Unlicense It appears that Unlicense is considered a free and GPL-compatible license; however, the page does suggest using CC0 instead (which is indeed a license approved / recognized by CRAN). CC0 appears to be the primary license recommended by the

Dear Uwe Ligges , I still can't finish it. *> aa* #my data x1 x2 y 5 0.05 6 4.4180 1 0.50 3 2.6979 4 0.50 9 2.9000 7 0.95 6 2.6230 8 0.95 6 2.9078 9 0.95 6 2.6727 3 1.40 3 2.4203 2 1.40 9 2.5329 6 1.85 6 2.4867 *> attach(aa)* *> persp(x1,x2,y* error in persp.default(x1, x2, y) : increasing 'x' and 'y' values expected

2017-06-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: > On 22.06.2017 17:11, Bernd Funovits wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I experienced some unexpected behaviour while determining the rank of matrices (sometimes 1x1 matrices): >> base::qr(matrix(1e-20))$rank returns 1 (incorrect) >> base::qr(diag(c(1, 1e-20)))$rank returns 2

Is that a method where a program that I write today would still run without changes in 10 years? Tim -----Original Message----- From: R-help <r-help-bounces at r-project.org> On Behalf Of Richard O'Keefe Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 8:08 AM To: Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> Cc: r-help at r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] Problem with compatible library versions

> On Jul 30, 2017, at 8:25 AM, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > > > > On 30.07.2017 17:22, Milan Cisty wrote: >> Dear all, >> I appreciate suggestions for following problem. I wrote to RStudio: >> plot(c(1,20),c(1,20), xlab = expression(paste(alfa))) >> or the same happen when I wrote: >> plot(c(1,20),c(1,20), xlab =

Hi Uwe and all, Error message was: error in normalizePath(path) : path[1]: no such file to load Many thanks, Odette On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Uwe Ligges <ligges@statistik.tu-dortmund.de > wrote: > > > Odette Gaston wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I am currently having the problem with using R 2.8.1 that I cannot install >> some of packages from

Dette er en melding med flere deler i MIME-format. --=_alternative 004C4E4A00257091_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Yes. so (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 = (x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8)^8 ? and there is a difference in (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8)^2 and (x1*x2*x3*x4*x5*x6*x7*x8) althoug the resulting formulas are the same, or? This fikses my problem, but R still crashes for the

I'd like to make just a couple of points: R-help is considered by quite a few people to be "high-traffic". As such, many have low appetite for very basic questions. (I wouldn't call them "silly".) In many cases such questions are answered by pointing to a particular function help page or manual section. In this particular case, it's probably not at the very

Your statement seems innocent enough on the face of it, but there are two facets that I think are worthy of note. The first is that of time, and more specifically who's time. As a user of other lists I can say that this is the best list in terms of getting the answer to my problem, albeit sometime's obliquely. I intermittently respond to questions generally of the type you refer to. I say