similar to: Shorewall and IPSEC

I set up an ipsec/racoon vpn tunnel test environment. The gateway machines are 192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.31 on the external adaptor and 10.0.1.1 and 10.0.2.1 internally. The test workstations are 10.0.1.10 and 10.0.2.10. The tunnel seems to be working as in 10.0.1.10 can talk to 10.0.2.10 an vice versa and they can both use the net via NAT, however 192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.31 cannot directly

I'm looking for someone familiar with setting up some of the more advanced features of the Lucent TNT, preferably someone with knowledge of Trunk Groups and choosing outgoing PRI channels based on call type and perhaps NPA-NXX We currently have 8 PRI's. 7 of them are for our dialup pool, the 8th is for our voip. We currently run the dialup PRI's to a seperate TNT We want to

Hello, We have 3 DSL connections connected to eth3 and another interface with a dedicated link in eth0 (main table) We want to balance selected traffic (using fwmark and iptables) through our 3 DSL connections in a secondary table named DSL (without using the dedicated link in eth0), but the next command is not accepted, and gives us the following error: # ip route add default

Hey guys, I installed tinc on a linux server which connects to the internet. That server is linked via a wireless link with a Windows 2000 workstation. I installed tinc on the windows box too, and the vpn works neat. The only problem is I don't know if the windows tap driver is able to forward unknown IPs to a gateway. This is because if I try to ping 10.0.0.1 which is just another

FYI... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall Date: Thursday 23 September 2004 07:44 From: "Jonathan Schneider" <jon@clearconcepts.ca> To: "''Tom Eastep''" <teastep@shorewall.net> I must have been up too late working on this, looking at it the next day I noticed I completely forgot

Hi folks, Sorry to trouble you all - I'm having some trouble getting tincd up and running - I suspect I'm having problems with subnets. Any help would relaly be appreciated! At the moment I'm trying to get two linux boxes, both of which are running as NAT routers for their respective networks to talk. My goal is to allow staff to connect to the corporate network from their laptops

For some reasons the afs tokenforwarding stuff has changed siginificantly from v 2.9p2 to 2.9.9p2. This makes it impossible to use public key authenticication in a standart AFS environment. I don't know the reasons for these changes. In any case attached is a patch which restores the old behaviour. Regards Serge -- Serge Droz Paul Scherrer Institut mailto:serge.droz at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 ------- Additional Comments From mzurakowski-bin@data.pl 2006-02-21 20:06 MET ------- In ip route add .../29 it should be /24 of course. I think that source routing is setup correctly: I can ping/connect to my router through both interfaces from outside no matter how I setup default routing on it. Marcin Z -- Configure bugmail:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55258 Priority: medium Bug ID: 55258 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nouveau failure on resume (reloc wait_idle failed) QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: mr.dash.four at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Summary: DNAT to internal network don't work with source routing and 2 uplinks Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

HI, I'm currently running redhat 7.3, using samba 2.2.7 on our webserver and am using Windows XP on the desktop, logging into our domain, I set up the sameba server to allow a specific user only to log in in the default workgroup 'Workgroup'. This was working fine (for around 2 weeks), but I decided to click the save password box in windows, and for some reason everytime now, it

Hello, I'm trying to figure out the proper way of passing parameters to my program that is being run by WINE. I've been trying different things I've found in Google, but none have seemed to work yet. The parameters work in a Windows environment, so I do believe the program is okay. This is on a SUSE/SLES 9 machine using WINE .917. If I want to pass the parameter

Hi tinc users, I have two Tinc nodes (A, B) running on trusted computers. Between A and B there's no direct internet connection. So I have to set up the third node X to bridge them: [ A ] ======= [ X ] ======= [ B ] trusted untrusted trusted X is on a cloud service like AWS thus it's on an untrusted third party. Once it's is compromised the attacker can access to the

OpenSSH 3.7 has just been released. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol version 1.3, 1.5 and 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. We would like to thank the OpenSSH community for their continued support to the project, especially those who contributed source and bought T-shirts or

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46557 Bug #: 46557 Summary: nouveau: nv40 display corruption in framebuffer and X lockups unless nouveau.noaccel=1 Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity:

Is there a way to have extensions automatically created for registered sip users ? I did some investigation and found some hope in chan_sip with relation to the somewhat undocumented usereqphone option but i may be totally off track. All i want to be able to do is send a call to number@ip_address where the number is the username configured on the phone that has registered with asterisk

Hello all, I'm having problems to make Dovecot proxy work, I configured it following dovecot's site. See my test below: It accepts login and password and then closes the connection. bastion01:~/build# telnet localhost 110 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. +OK Dovecot ready. user raphael.costa at xxxx.com.br +OK pass xxxxxx +OK Logged in.

We want to join out Linux-Server: SLES 10 SP1 x86 with Samba (samba-client-3.0.24-2.23) to our W2000 Domain. so i use the command: net join -S TQ-NET.DE -UAdministrator and i get the following Errormessage: Failed to join domain! ADS join did not work, falling back to RPC... [2008/03/12 12:07:29, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_newstyle(350) Error in domain join verification

<% for demand in @demands %> <% cache(:action => ''list'',:part => article.id) do -%> <%= render :partial => ''article''} %> <% end %> <% end %> Under webrick,the time that list rendering costs will be very soon,but under apache2.2+mongrel_cluster, the rendering still takes a long time- which occupies about 95% of the

Hi, In my LAN Iam trying to make following setup: - All the traffic generated by 10.0.2.1 should go to 10.0.2.11, If the destination of this traffic is internet than it should be placed on its interface eth1. Outgoing traffic on eth1 should be shaped.For this I am using fw filters and cbq. _______ 10.0.2.1 -------> 10.0.2.11(eth0 )----| A