similar to: Bug in profile.nls with algorithm = "plinear"

I have found some "issues" (bugs?) with nls confidence intervals ... some with the relatively new "port" algorithm, others more general (but possibly in the "well, don't do that" category). I have corresponded some with Prof. Ripley about them, but I thought I would just report how far I've gotten in case anyone else has thoughts. (I'm finding the code

Dear list, I have encountered a problem with predict.nls (Windows XP, R.2.5.0), but I am not sure if it is a bug... On the nls man page, an example is: DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1) fm2DNase1 <- nls(density ~ 1/(1 + exp((xmid - log(conc))/scal)), data = DNase1, start = list(xmid = 0, scal = 1)) alg = "plinear", trace =

Hi! When checking validity of a model for a large number of experimental data I thought it to be interesting to check the information provided by the summary method programmatically. Still I could not find out which method to use to get to those data. Example (not my real world data, but to show the point): [BEGIN] > DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1) > fm1DNase1 <- nls(density ~

Hello, nls library provides 6 self-starting models, among them: SSfp, a four parameters logistic function. Its self-starting procedure involves several steps. One of these steps is: pars <- as.vector(coef(nls(y ~ cbind(1, 1/(1 + exp((xmid - x)/exp(lscal)))), data = xydata, start = list(lscal = 0), algorithm = "plinear"))) which assumes an initial value of lscal equal to 0. If lscal

Dear all, I am studying a bit the various support functions that exist for extracting information from fitted model objects. From the help files it is not completely clear to me whether the number returned by nobs() should be the same as the "nobs" attribute of the object returned by logLik(). If so, then there is a slight inconsistency in the methods for 'nls' objects with

Hello, How do I specify the formula and random effects without a startup object ? I thought it would be a mixture of nls and lme. after trying very hard, I ask for help on using nlme. Can someone hint me to some examples? I constructed a try using the example from nls: #variables are density, conc and Run #all works fine with nls DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1 ) fm2DNase1 <- nls(

Dear all, I encounter some discrepancies when comparing the deviance of a weighted and unweigthed model with the AIC values. A general example (from 'nls'): DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1) fm1DNase1 <- nls(density ~ SSlogis(log(conc), Asym, xmid, scal), DNase1) This is the unweighted fit, in the code of 'nls' one can see that 'nls' generates a vector

Dear All, I encounter some discrepancies when comparing the deviance of a weighted and unweigthed model with the AIC values. A general example (from 'nls'): DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1) fm1DNase1 <- nls(density ~ SSlogis(log(conc), Asym, xmid, scal), DNase1) Now for a weighted fit: fm2DNase1 <- nls(density ~ SSlogis(log(conc), Asym, xmid, scal),

Greetings, We are performing a meta-analysis of mink pup survival data versus chemical concentration. We have modeled percent survival successfully using nls as shown below and the plot. What we need to do is construct a confidence interval on the concentration at which we get 50% survival (aka the EC50, although we may want other percent survivals in the future). My first question is, what seems

Hi, I am not sure this is a bug but I can repeat it, The functions and data are below. I know this is nasty data, and it is very questionable whether a 4pl model is appropriate, but it is data fed to an automated tool and I would have hoped for an error. Does this repeat for anyone else? My details: > version _ platform i686-pc-linux-gnu

I'm wondering whether AIC scores extracted from nls() objects using AIC() are based on the correct number of estimated parameters. Using the example under nls() documentation: > data( DNase ) > DNase1 <- DNase[ DNase$Run == 1, ] > ## using a selfStart model > fm1DNase1 <- nls( density ~ SSlogis( log(conc), Asym, xmid, scal ), DNase1 ) Using AIC() function: >

Full_Name: Madeleine Yeh Version: 1.9.1 OS: AIX 5.2 Submission from: (NULL) (151.121.225.1) After compiling R-1.9.1 on AIX 5.2 using the IBM cc compiler, I ran the checks. One of them failed. Here is the output from running the check solo. root@svweb:/fsapps/test/build/R/1.9.1/R-1.9.1/tests/Examples: ># ../../bin/R --vanilla < stats-Ex.R R : Copyright 2004, The R

hello all i havnt had a chance to read through the references provided for the "nls" function (since the libraries are closed now). can anyone shed some light on how the "plinear" algorithm works? also, how are the fitted values obtained? also, WHAT DOES THE ".lin" below REPRESENT? thanking you in advance ###################################### i have a quick

Thanks Adaikalavan, however the problem remains. Considering AIC() as applied to the linear model in AIC() help documentation: > data(swiss) > lm1 <- lm(Fertility ~ . , data = swiss) > AIC(lm1) [1] 326.0716 Clearly this includes the estimation of the residual standard error as an estimated parameter, as this gives the correct score: > -2*logLik(lm1) + 2*(length(coef(lm1))+1)

Dear R gurus, As part of finding initial values for a much more complicated fit I want to fit a function of the form y ~ a + bx + cx^d to fairly "noisy" data and have hit some problems. To demonstrate the specific R-related problem, here is an idealised data set, smaller and better fitting than reality: # idealised data set aDF <- data.frame( x= c(1.80, 9.27, 6.48, 2.61, 9.86,

Hi All. I've run into a problem with the plinear algorithm in nls that is confusing me. Assume the following reaction time data over 15 trials for a single unit. Trials are coded from 0-14 so that the intercept represents reaction time in the first trial. trl RT 0 1132.0 1 630.5 2 1371.5 3 704.0 4 488.5 5 575.5 6 613.0 7 824.5 8 509.0 9

Hello, i have a problem with the function nls(). This are my data in "k": V1 V2 [1,] 0 0.367 [2,] 85 0.296 [3,] 122 0.260 [4,] 192 0.244 [5,] 275 0.175 [6,] 421 0.140 [7,] 603 0.093 [8,] 831 0.068 [9,] 1140 0.043 With the nls()-function i want to fit following formula whereas a,b, and c are variables: y~1/(a*x^2+b*x+c) With the standardalgorithm

Hola amigos, Supongamos que se quiere ejecutar un modelo no lineal con nls. Pensemos en el ejemplo de la ayuda: DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1) fm1DNase1 <- nls(density ~ SSlogis(log(conc), Asym, xmid, scal), DNase1) summary(fm1DNase1) Aquí se está modelando la densidad óptica de un ensayo relacionada de forma no lineal (logística) con (el logaritmo) de la concentración de una proteína.

"in non linear modelling finding appropriate starting values is something like an art"... (maybe from somewhere in Crawley , 2007) Here a colleague and I just want to compare different response models to a null model. This has worked OK for almost all the other data sets except that one (dumped below). Whatever our trials and algorithms, even subsetting data (to check if some singular

I was wondering if there is way to place constraints upon the "plinear" algorithm of nls, or rather is there a manner in which this can be achieved because nls does not allow this to be done. I only want to place constraints on one of the nonlinear parameters, a, such that it is between 0 and 1. I have attempted to use a=pnorm(a*) , but then the fitting procedure becomes