similar to: Some "lm" methods give wrong results when applied to "mlm" objects

Greetings to r-help land. I've run into some program crashes and I've traced them back to methods() behavior after the package gdata is loaded. I provide now a minimal re-producible example. This seems bugish to me. How about you? dat <- data.frame(x = rnorm(100), y = rnorm(100)) lm1 <- lm(y ~ x, data = dat) methods(class = "lm") ## OK so far library(gdata)

I am using the Unix version of R (version 1.7.0), installed via fink on a G4 Macintosh. I recently upgraded from version 1.6.0 and found that the "car" library now has a problem: ---Begin transcript--- >library(car) Attaching package 'car': The following object(s) are masked from package:base : dfbeta dfbeta.lm dfbetas dfbetas.lm hatvalues hatvalues.lm

Hi there, I have the problem, that I'm not able to reproduce the SPSS residual statistics (dfbeta and cook's distance) with a simple binary logistic regression model obtained in R via the glm-function. I tried the following: fit <- glm(y ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data, family=binomial) cooks.distance(fit) dfbetas(fit) When i compare the returned values with the values that I get in SPSS,

I'm following up on a question I posted 8/10/2010, but my newsreader has lost this thread. > Barrett & Ling, JASA, 1992, v.87(417), pp184-191 define general > classes of influence measures for multivariate > regression models, including analogs of Cook's D, Andrews & Pregibon > COVRATIO, etc. As in univariate > response models, these are based on leverage and

Barrett & Ling, JASA, 1992, v.87(417), pp184-191 define general classes of influence measures for multivariate regression models, including analogs of Cook's D, Andrews & Pregibon COVRATIO, etc. As in univariate response models, these are based on leverage and residuals based on omitting one (or more) observations at a time and refitting, although, in the univariate case, the

Deducer 0.1 has been released to CRAN Deducer is designed to be a free, easy to use, alternative to proprietary software such as SPSS, JMP, and Minitab. It has a menu system to do common data manipulation and data analysis tasks, and an excel-like spreadsheet in which to view and edit data frames. The goal of the project is to two fold. 1. Provide an intuitive interface so that non-technical

Deducer 0.1 has been released to CRAN Deducer is designed to be a free, easy to use, alternative to proprietary software such as SPSS, JMP, and Minitab. It has a menu system to do common data manipulation and data analysis tasks, and an excel-like spreadsheet in which to view and edit data frames. The goal of the project is to two fold. 1. Provide an intuitive interface so that non-technical

Hi there I have created a multivariate logistic regression model looking at the presence/absence of disease on farms. I would like to plot the diagnostic plots recommended by Hosmer & Lemeshow to look particularly for any points of high influence. In order to do this I need to extract values for delta-beta. The function dfbeta gives a value for change in each coefficient but I am looking

I would like to perform multiple comparisons or post-hoc testing on the independent variable in an Anova.mlm object generated by the Anova function of the car package. I have defined a multivariate linear model and subsequently performed a repeated measures ANOVA as per the instructions in section #3 of the following comprehensive tutorial on the subject from the Gribble lab at UWO:

Hi all I'm getting a NaN returned on using dffits, as explained below. To me, there seems no obvious (or non-obvious reason for that matter) reason why a NaN appears. Before I start digging further, can anyone see why dffits might be failing? Is there a problem with the data? Consider: # Load data dep <-

Hi, yet another anova.mlm problem - it doesn't seem to end. This time, I have a setup with a few within-subject factors and a between-subject factor (SGROUP). Consider the most simple case with only one within-factor (apo): > mlmfit0 <- lm(data.n ~ 0 + SGROUP) > mlmfit1 <- lm(data.n ~ 1 + SGROUP) > anova(mlmfit1,mlmfit0,test="Spherical",M=~hemi,X=~1) Analysis of

Hi Folks, Hopefully this question has enough R and not too much stats to be appropriate for this list. Based on,* Hosmer et al. 2013. Logistic regression for matched case-control studies. Applied Logistic Regression *(eqtn. 7.8)*, *I am assessing GOF of conditional (or matched) logistic regression models with the *standardized Pearson residuals*. The authors define ?large? as delta chi-squared

Discover "The Secret to Supercharge your MLM!" A must read... Hi there, The secret is out! Here's the mail we've all been waiting for! Read carefully and take immediate action on it! I've discovered an amazing formula that will give your MLM an enormous enrollers explosion. You'll benefit hugely if you use it with YOUR primary MLM! -THE ULTIMATE RECRUITMENT

>>>>> steven pav >>>>> on Thu, 19 Jul 2018 21:51:07 -0700 writes: > It seems that confint.default returns an empty data.frame > for objects of class mlm. For example: > It seems that confint.default returns an empty data.frame for objects of > class mlm. Not quite: Note that 'mlm' objects are also 'lm' objects, and so it is

influence.measures gives several measures of influence for each observation (Cook's Distance, etc) and actually flags observations that it determines are influential by any of the measures. Looks good! But how does it discriminate between the influential and non- influential observations by each of the measures? Like does it do a Bonferroni-corrected t on the residuals identified by

Dear R-devel'ers Below is an outline for a set of routines to improve support for multivariate linear models and "classical" repeated measurements analysis. Nothing has been coded yet, so everything is subject to change as loose ideas get confronted by the harsh realities of programming. Comments are welcome. They might even influence the implementation... -pd General

Full_Name: Yves Rosseel Version: 2.2.1 OS: Submission from: (NULL) (157.193.116.152) The code below sketches a possible implementation of a function 'mlh.mlm' which I think would be a good complement to the 'anova.mlm' function in the stats package. It tests a single linear hypothesis of the form H_0: LBT'= 0 where B is the matrix of regression coefficients; L is a matrix

Hi, I've looked around but can't find a clear answer to the difference for these two? Any help? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/dfbetas-vs-dfbeta-tp26331704p26331704.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[hope this doesn't get posted twice, my first mail bounced] Hi, again, this is about the call bug in anova.mlm. I originally reported it as PR#7898 and I suggested a fix at PR#7904. (None of these message were forwarded to R-Devel, instead I received a bounce telling me that my provider's SPF settings are incorrect. They are, though, so there seems to be a problem with the

Full_Name: Yves Rosseel Version: 2.2.1 OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu Submission from: (NULL) (157.193.116.152) Dear developers, For the single-model case, the anova.mlm() function does not seem to handle multi-parameter predictors (eg factors) correctly. A toy example illustrates the problem: Y <- cbind(rnorm(100),rnorm(100),rnorm(100)) A <- factor(rep(c(1,2,3,4), each=25)) fit <- lm(Y ~ A)