Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "sample() fails with double or integer NA input of length one"
2023 Nov 08
1
c(NA, 0+1i) not the same as c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)?
So, to summarize, the open questions are:
(1) Should as.complex(NA_character_) give complex(r=NA_real_, i=0)
instead of NA_complex_?
(2) Should the first argument in c(NA, x) and c(NA_integer_, x),
where typeof(x) == "complex", be promoted to complex(r=NA_real_, i=0)
instead of NA_complex_?
My opinions:
(1) No. The imaginary part of the
2023 Nov 06
1
c(NA, 0+1i) not the same as c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)?
Hmm, it is not actually at odds with help(c), it is just that the autocoercion works different that it used to, so that
as.complex(NA) == as.complex(NA_real) == NA_real_+0i)
which now differs from
NA_complex
although both print as NA.
I haven't been quite alert when this change was discussed, but it does look a bit unfortunate that usage patterns like c(NA, 0+1i) does not give complex NA
2023 Nov 09
1
c(NA, 0+1i) not the same as c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)?
>>>>> Mikael Jagan
>>>>> on Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:13:18 -0500 writes:
> So, to summarize, the open questions are:
> (1) Should as.complex(NA_character_) give complex(r=NA_real_, i=0)
> instead of NA_complex_?
> (2) Should the first argument in c(NA, x) and c(NA_integer_, x),
> where typeof(x) == "complex", be promoted
2023 Apr 14
1
Possible inconsistency between `as.complex(NA_real_)` and the docs
Hi all,
Surprisingly (at least to me), `as.complex(NA_real_)` results in
`complex(real = NA_real_, imaginary = 0)` rather than `NA_complex_`.
It seems to me that this goes against the docs of `as.complex()`,
which say this in the Details section:
"Up to R versions 3.2.x, all forms of NA and NaN were coerced to a
complex NA, i.e., the NA_complex_ constant, for which both the real
and
2013 Dec 12
2
Status of reserved keywords and builtins
According to http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html#Reserved-words
if else repeat while function for in next break
TRUE FALSE NULL Inf NaN
NA NA_integer_ NA_real_ NA_complex_ NA_character_
... ..1 ..2 etc.
are all reserved keywords.
However, in R 3.0.2 you can do things like:
`if` <- function(cond, val1, val2) val2
after which
if(TRUE) 1 else 2
returns 2.
2023 Nov 06
1
c(NA, 0+1i) not the same as c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)?
>>>>> Michael Chirico
>>>>> on Sun, 5 Nov 2023 09:41:42 -0800 writes:
> This is another follow-up to the thread from September
> "Recent changes to as.complex(NA_real_)".
> A test in data.table was broken by the changes for NA
> coercion to complex; the breakage essentially comes from
> c(NA, 0+1i)
> # vs
2023 Nov 07
1
c(NA, 0+1i) not the same as c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)?
Thanks Martin. My hang-up was not on what the outcome of as.complex(NA)
should be, but rather, how I should read code like c(x, y) generally. Till
now, I have thought of it like 'c(x, y)' is c(as(x, typeof(y)), y)` when
"type(y) > type(x)". Basically in my mind, "coercion" in R <->
as.<newtype>(.) (or coerceVector() in C).
So I tracked down the source
2023 Nov 05
2
c(NA, 0+1i) not the same as c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)?
This is another follow-up to the thread from September "Recent changes to
as.complex(NA_real_)".
A test in data.table was broken by the changes for NA coercion to complex;
the breakage essentially comes from
c(NA, 0+1i)
# vs
c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)
The former is the output we tested against; the latter is essentially (via
coerceVector() in C) what's generated by our
2009 Jun 03
1
Print bug for matrix(list(NA_complex_, ...))
In R 2.8.0 on Windows (tested both under ESS and under R Console in case
there was an I/O issue)
There is a bug in printing val <- matrix(list(NA_complex_,NA_complex_),1).
> dput(val)
structure(list(NA_complex_, NA_complex_), .Dim = 1:2)
> print(val)
[,1]
[1,]
[,2]
[1,]
Note that a large number of spaces are printed instead of NA. Compare the
unproblematic real case:
2000 Apr 28
4
problem need help
I've installed the openss* rpm's from
metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/contrib/libc6/i386
on a redhat 6.2 system.
sshd is running but refuses all connections from all hosts including
localhost. The client reports debug: Connection established.
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
debug: Calling cleanup 0x8056160(0x0)
2015 Jan 29
2
Tinc and OpenWRT
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, Sandy McArthur Jr wrote:
> I use the Tinc 1.0 series since I don't want to support my
> own packages. <snip>
> I wrote most of http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/vpn.tinc and that is
> what I still use. Since then . . .
Ok. I think I'll start with the 1.0 series packages that are already
out there and get them working.
and on Tue, Jan 27, 2015,
2002 Mar 06
3
Win2000 - Very Slow opening files from Samba Share
Hello,
I hope you can be of some assistance.
I am using Samba 2.2.0 on SCO Open Server 5.0.5.
I have a number of various clients on the Network eg Win 98 and Win 2000.
My Unix Server is a PIII 1000, dual CPU computer with dual Raid 1 (mirroring
disks)
Samba is working well from the Win 98 Machines.
However, from the Win 2000 machines when I try to open an Excel file from
one of the Shared
2010 Mar 31
2
Should as.complex(NaN) -> NA?
I'm having trouble grokking complex NaN's.
This first set examples using complex(re=NaN,im=NaN)
give what I expect
> Re(complex(re=NaN, im=NaN))
[1] NaN
> Im(complex(re=NaN, im=NaN))
[1] NaN
> Arg(complex(re=NaN, im=NaN))
[1] NaN
> Mod(complex(re=NaN, im=NaN))
[1] NaN
> abs(complex(re=NaN, im=NaN))
[1] NaN
and so do the following
> Re(complex(re=1,
2015 Jun 13
2
Tinc and OpenWRT
Hey Saverio,
I'd really like the idea of a tinc-1.1-pre package for OpenWRT. I'm
currently using tinc-1.1 with an Ed25519-only network, really like the
new features and CLI and want to add some OpenWRT routers into the mix.
How do you plan to handle things with OpenSSL?
tinc-1.1 from git should be able to compile without it (but will then
only support the built-in algorithms). Depending
2014 Jun 01
1
Tips punching through tight firewalls
Any tips or guidance on improving the probability of being able to connect
to a Tinc daemon.
I am currently on a guest wifi at a hospital for my in-laws family. Wanting
to pass time and be semi productive, I tried to VPN back to my private
networks but it appears the default port Tinc users is blocked.
Here is what I know about their firewall:
2018 Jan 22
2
as.character(list(NA))
On 01/20/2018 08:24 AM, William Dunlap via R-devel wrote:
> I believe that for a list as.character() applies deparse() to each element
> of the list. deparse() does not preserve NA-ness, as it is intended to
> make text that the parser can read.
>
>> str(as.character(list(Na=NA, LglVec=c(TRUE,NA),
> Function=function(x){x+1})))
> chr [1:3] "NA" "c(TRUE,
2007 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] Web Site Re-Design
On Jul 27, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Gabriel McArthur wrote:
> I offered to do the web site a couple of weeks ago. Life got in
> the way temporarily, and it took me a long time to make it look the
> way that I wanted and to make it look the same in IE6. Anyway, I
> wanted to get some feedback on what I had done.
Note to self/dumba**: include web site next time.
2006 Aug 24
1
smb.conf template homedir
For local login to our samba server, we are using posix information
stored in an openldap directory. - I can log in via shell with no problems.
We are authenticating samba against AD2003. I can attach to the samba
server from both windows and macintosh - just not access my home directory.
Currently, "template homedir = /home/%U" - which results in a path of
/home/<username>
I
2013 Aug 01
3
filefrag and btrfs filesystem defragment and maybe snapshots
While exploring some btrfs maintenance with respect to defragmenting I
ran the following commands:
# filefrag /path/to/34G.file /path/to/5.7G.file
/path/to/34G.file: 2406 extents found
/path/to/5.7G.file: 572 extents found
Thinking those mostly static files could be less fragmented I ran:
# btrfs filesystem defragment -c /path/to/34G.file
# btrfs filesystem defragment -c /path/to/5.7G.file
and
2015 Oct 21
1
Confusing print method for Inf dates
x <- as.Date(Inf, origin = "1970-01-01")
x
#> [1] NA
str(x)
#> Date[1:1], format: NA
unclass(x)
#> [1] Inf
It's not clear what the correct behaviour is. The documentation for
?Date has: "It is intended that the date should be an integer,", which
suggests that -Inf and Inf are not valid dates. But if that's true the
behaviour for max.Date() needs some