similar to: That 'make check-all' problem with the survival package

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "That 'make check-all' problem with the survival package"

2015 May 16
1
That 'make check-all' problem with the survival package
'make check-all' for current R has been showing this error in the middle for a few months now - any thought on fixing this? I think cmprsk should be either included in the recommended bundle, or the survival vignette to not depend on it. Having 'make check-all' showing glaring ERROR's for a few months seems to defeat the purpose of doing any checking at all via 'make
2015 May 17
0
That 'make check-all' problem with the survival package
------------------------------ On Sat, May 16, 2015 2:33 PM BST Marc Schwartz wrote: > >> On May 16, 2015, at 6:11 AM, Hin-Tak Leung <htl10 at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> On Sat, May 16, 2015 8:04 AM BST Uwe Ligges wrote: >> >> Not sure why this goes to R-devel. You just could have asked
2013 Oct 18
1
crr question‏ in library(cmprsk)
Hi all I do not understand why I am getting the following error message. Can anybody help me with this? Thanks in advance. install.packages("cmprsk") library(cmprsk) result1 <-crr(ftime, fstatus, cov1, failcode=1, cencode=0 ) one.pout1 = predict(result1,cov1,X=cbind(1,one.z1,one.z2)) predict.crr(result1,cov1,X=cbind(1,one.z1,one.z2)) Error: could not find function
2008 Aug 22
1
Help on competing risk package cmprsk with time dependent covariate
Dear R users, I d like to assess the effect of "treatment" covariate on a disease relapse risk with the package cmprsk. However, the effect of this covariate on survival is time-dependent (assessed with cox.zph): no significant effect during the first year of follow-up, then after 1 year a favorable effect is observed on survival (step function might be the correct way to say that ?).
2009 Jun 25
2
crr - computationally singular
Dear R-help, I'm very sorry to ask 2 questions in a week. I am using the package 'crr' and it does exactly what I need it to when I use the dataset a. However, when I use dataset b I get the following error message: Error in drop(.Call("La_dgesv", a, as.matrix(b), tol, PACKAGE = "base")) : system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number =
2008 Aug 20
0
cmprsk and a time dependent covariate in the model
Dear R users, I d like to assess the effect of "treatment" covariate on a disease relapse risk with the package cmprsk. However, the effect of this covariate on survival is time-dependent (assessed with cox.zph): no significant effect during the first year of follow-up, then after 1 year a favorable effect is observed on survival (step function might be the correct way to say that
2008 Aug 22
0
Re : Help on competing risk package cmprsk with time dependent covariate
Hello again, I m trying to use timereg package as you suggested (R2.7.1 on XP Pro). here is my script based on the example from timereg for a fine & gray model in which relt = time to event, rels = status 0/1/2 2=competing, 1=event of interest, 0=censored random = covariate I want to test library(timereg) rel<-read.csv("relapse2.csv", header = TRUE, sep = ",",
2009 Aug 02
1
Competing Risks Regression with qualitative predictor with more than 2 categories
Hello, I have a question regarding competing risk regression using cmprsk package (function crr()). I am using R2.9.1. How can I do to assess the effect of qualitative predictor (gg) with more than two categories (a,b,c) categorie c is the reference category. See above results, gg is considered like a ordered predictor ! Thank you for your help Jan > # simulated data to test > set.seed(10)
2005 Oct 24
6
Rgnome depends on obsolete components libglade/libxml (PR#8247)
Full_Name: Hin-Tak Leung Version: R 2.2.0 OS: x86 linux Submission from: (NULL) (131.111.126.242) Rgnome depends libglade 0.x and libxml 1.x . They are no longer shipped with Redhat EL4. (I know they are still in fedora core 4). Just a wish-list.
2005 Nov 17
4
problem with \eqn (PR#8322)
Full_Name: Ross Boylan Version: 2.2.0 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (65.175.48.58) \eqn{{\bf\beta}_j}{b(j)} in my .Rd file produces this error -------------------------------------------- ! Missing $ inserted. <inserted text> $ l.7 \eqn{{\bf\beta}_j}{\bf\beta}_ jnormal-bracket5bracket-normal{b(j)} -- ! Missing $ inserted. <inserted
2009 Oct 27
1
Error in solve.default peforming Competing risk regression
Dear all, I am trying to use the crr function in the cmprsk package version 2.2 to analyse 198 observations.I have receive the error in solve.default. Can anyone give me some insights into where the problem is? Thanks here is my script : cov=cbind(x1,x2) z<-crr(ftime,fstatus,cov)) and data file: x1 x2 fstatus ftime 0 .02 1 263 0 .03 1 113 0 .03 1 523
2006 May 10
0
using crr in cmprsk
Hi, I need to fit model using crr, however my covariate is categorical with 3 levels. I use crr(time,status,agesplit,failcode=1,cencode=0) where agesplit is defined as <20,21-29,>30 years, so it takes 0, 1 or 2 for each patient. I hoped to get estimated coefficients for the levels 1 and 2 w.r.t level 0 as in coxph. But, I didn't. Could someone please help me to use crr in this
2009 Feb 27
2
Competing risks adjusted for covariates
Dear R-users Has anybody implemented a function/package that will compute an individual's risk of an event in the presence of competing risks, adjusted for the individual's covariates? The only thing that seems to come close is the cuminc function from cmprsk package, but I would like to adjust for more than one covariate (it allows you to stratify by a single grouping vector). Any
2009 Mar 25
2
Competing risks Kalbfleisch & Prentice method
Dear R users I would like to calculate the Cumulative incidence for an event adjusting for competing risks and adjusting for covariates. One way to do this in R is to use the cmprsk package, function crr. This uses the Fine & Gray regression model. However, a simpler and more classical approach would be to implement the Kalbfleisch & Prentice method (1980, p 169), where one fits cause
2007 Jan 10
2
wine and build difference between R.2.4.0 and R 2.4.1 windows binaries?
Does anybody (most probably the core team) know if there is any difference in how the official 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 binaries are built? Problem is, 2.4.0 loads with the wine (I tried a few recent versions, and also used 2.3.x under wine from time to time), but 2.4.1 won't. Thanks. Hin-Tak Leung
2005 Nov 04
2
Classification Trees and basic Random Forest pkg using t ree structures in C
> From: Hin-Tak Leung > > Izmirlian, Grant (NIH/NCI) wrote: > <snipped> > > The only interesting feature is that the tree structure has been > > implemented in C. Its a neater way to carry stuff around and I am > > guessing would make future implementation easier. > > > > Because of its inherent redundancy from the users standpoint, it > >
2005 Oct 26
2
Microsoft help files
I wonder if the software here: http://morte.jedrea.com/~jedwin/projects/chmlib/ or at any of the links on that page might allow elimination of the need for separately downloading the Microsoft Help compiler -- which is just one more task that one must perform to get up and running to build your own R packages on Windows.
2011 Oct 22
3
Sweave, cairo_pdf, CJK, ghostscript
I have had some fun in the last few days trying to put together an annotated map of China with R and some public GIS data: http://sourceforge.net/projects/outmodedbonsai/files/snpMatrix%20next/1.17.7.11/China_Choropleth_Maps.pdf/download It is done, and rather nice... there are a few issues: - the default pdf() device cannot do CJK with embedded fonts - and cairo_pdf() is not hooked up to
2017 Feb 20
1
another fix for R crashes under enable-strict-barrier, lto, trunk@72156
On 2nd thought, I think a better fix to the segfault is something like this: --- a/src/main/memory.c +++ b/src/main/memory.c @@ -3444,6 +3444,8 @@ R_xlen_t (XTRUELENGTH)(SEXP x) { return XTRUELENGTH(CHK2(x)); } int (IS_LONG_VEC)(SEXP x) { return IS_LONG_VEC(CHK2(x)); } const char *(R_CHAR)(SEXP x) { + if(!x) + error("de-referncing null. Check the validity of your data.");
2006 Jan 27
1
rbind/cbind unimplemented for raw (RAWSXP) types. (PR#8529)
Full_Name: Hin-Tak Leung Version: R 2.2.1 OS: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu Submission from: (NULL) (131.111.186.92) rbind/cbind is unimplemented for raw (RAWSXP) types. I have a working patch implementing the functionality, to follow. --please do not edit the information below-- Version: platform = x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu arch = x86_64 os = linux-gnu system = x86_64, linux-gnu status = major