similar to: R CMD check: Uses the superseded package: ‘doSNOW’

Oh, I completely missed that one. It's very neat as it seems to work both on Windows and Unix. Thanks! Xavier On 10/02/15 10:52, Martyn Plummer wrote: > The CRAN package snow is superseded by the parallel package which is > distributed with R since version 2.14.0. Here are the release notes > > \item There is a new package \pkg{parallel}. > > It incorporates (slightly

The CRAN package snow is superseded by the parallel package which is distributed with R since version 2.14.0. Here are the release notes \item There is a new package \pkg{parallel}. It incorporates (slightly revised) copies of packages \CRANpkg{multicore} and \CRANpkg{snow} (excluding MPI, PVM and NWS clusters). Code written to use the higher-level API functions in those packages should

Hi all, Within a foreach loop with doSNOW, we cant call functions which come from the non-default package. We need to load(require/library) the package once more within the foreach loop. Anyone knows why would happen like this? Is it caused by the snow package and something happened when "snow" parallelize the job? Other than load the package once more with in the foreach loop, is

Hello, I'm running some code that requires untaring many files in the first step. This takes a lot of time and I'd like to do this in parallel, if possible. If it's the disk reading speed that is the bottleneck I guess I should not expect an improvement, but perhaps it's the processor. So I want to try this out. I'm working on windows 7 with R 2.15.1 and the latest foreach

I know this is not a revolution support forum, but as anyone noticed the following? I have a foreach loop to generate random samples. If I run the exact code below in normal r (2.14.1) it works as expected, but if I run it from revolution 4.2.0 each loop returns the same numbers. The only way I can get revolution to give different numbers is using 1 instead of 8 in registerDoSNOW(makeCluster(8,

Shouldn't -n be 4 in the bsub command? One master+3 slaves. This was required for snowfall, but I think doSNOW is similar. Hope it helps mario On 16-Dec-10 23:09, Marius Hofert wrote: > Dear expeRts, > > I try to get a minimal example for parallel computing via "foreach" + "doSNOW" to run on a computer cluster (Brutus from

Whas missing the R in the command line: "mpirun -n --hostfile /home/hostfile R --no-save -f rtest.R" Hope this helps mario On 13-Jan-11 22:08, Justin Moriarty wrote: > Hi, > Just wanted to share a working example of doSNOW and foreach for an openMPI cluster. The function eddcmp() is just an example and returns some inocuous warnings. The

Hi all, I've got a package i've written that i am trying to check, build, and install. This is my 1st time doing this, so apologies in advance... ;) The package that I've written requires input from the user. It needs to know sample sizes and then runs some calcs, (sample sizes are just integers), and it gets this info from the user as num_reps <- readline("How many reps

I am trying to do parallel programming and I tried this library(doSNOW) library(foreach) testfunc<-function(x){ x<-x+1 x } noc<-2 cl <- makeCluster(do.call(rbind,rep(list("localhost"),noc)), type = "SOCK") registerDoSNOW(cl) clusterExport(cl=cl,c("testfunc.r")) testl<-foreach(pp=1:2) %dopar% { testfunc(pp) } And this works but if I try to

Hello, I was using snow to parallel-process some code in R-2.10 (32-bit windows. ). The code is as follows: require(foreach) require(doSNOW) cl <- makeCluster(6, type='SOCK') registerDoSNOW(cl) bl2 <- foreach(i=icount(length(unqmrno))) %dopar% { (some code here) } stopCluster(cl) When I run the same code in Windows R-2.11 (either 32-bit or 64-bit), R hangs at

Dear expeRts, This is a similar post as on R-SIG-MAC [I didn't receive an answer there; not sure if it was the right place to post either]. I'm running R version 2.12.1 (Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit)) on a MacBook Pro under Mac OS X 10.6.6. The following minimal example runs fine under this setup. However, if I am connected to a server via a VPN client [Cisco

Dear list, I am trying to clear the following note that is generated by an R CMD check --as-cran on my package (pROC): > * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... NOTE > Found the following apparent S3 methods exported but not registered: > ci.auc ci.coords ci.se ci.sp ci.thresholds roc.test > See section ?Registering S3 methods? in the ?Writing R Extensions? > manual.

Hello group, I am experimenting with parallel processing on my quad core Win 7 32 bit machine. Using these packages for the first time. I can see all my processor running at full performance when I use a smaller dataset require(snow) require(doSNOW) require(foreach) #change the 8 to however many cores\phys processors you have on your machine cl.tmp = makeCluster(rep("localhost",4),

Dear All, I have three classes of questions about generating random numbers with different packages (windows xp 32bit R). . 1. Suppose I would like to use package *foreach*, can I use current Sys.time as a seed? Although I can get the time up to1e-6 second precesion, the code below dose not work well on a local machine with two cores. ################# library(foreach) library(snow)

Hi I have managed to install MPICH2 and Rmpi on my Windows 7 machine. I can also run the following code > library(Rmpi) > mpi.spawn.Rslaves() 4 slaves are spawned successfully. 0 failed. master (rank 0, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave1 (rank 1, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave2 (rank 2, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave3

Dear R help, I am trying to set up a cluster for parallel computing on a machine running 64-bit windows XP, using the doSNOW package on R 2.14.1. However, the command makeCluster() consistently makes the computer hang. No R processes are started, no CPU consumed, R just becomes unresponsive. ESC still terminates the command, but I cannot start the cluster. There seems to be quite a lot of posts

Hi I have managed to install MPICH2 and Rmpi on my Windows 7 machine. I can also run the following code > library(Rmpi) > mpi.spawn.Rslaves() 4 slaves are spawned successfully. 0 failed. master (rank 0, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave1 (rank 1, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave2 (rank 2, comm 1) of size 5 is running on: MyMaster slave3 (rank 3, comm

Dear expeRts, I struggle with the following problem using snow clusters for parallel computing: I would like to specify l'Ecuyer's random number generator. Base R creates a .Random.seed of length 7, the first value indicating the kind fo random number generator. I would thus like to use the components 2 to 7 as the seed for l'Ecuyer's random number generator. By doing so, I

foreach (or virtually anything you might use for concurrent programming) only really makes sense if the work the "clients" are doing is substantial enough to overwhelm the communication overhead. And there are many ways to accomplish the same task more or less efficiently (for example, doing blocks of tasks in chunks rather than passing each one as an individual job). But more to the

Bug or feature? I get the following error from parse_Rd() when a user Rd macro (including system ones) is invoked with empty argument {}, eg \mymacro{}: Error in tools::parse_Rd(fn) : Value of SET_STRING_ELT() must be a 'CHARSXP' not a 'NULL' A full example is further below with the system macro \CRANpkg{}. In this example it doesn't make sense to use empty argument but