similar to: Using FPP preprocessor for Fortran Code

Dear All, I am trying to use the function ses from the forecast package. >From its help I have : Usage: ses(y, h = 10, level = c(80, 95), fan = FALSE, initial = c("optimal", "simple"), alpha = NULL, lambda = NULL, biasadj = FALSE, x = y, ...) My query is that if I do not mention the initial value will its default value be "optimal". A MWE would be

Hello, when I do: /opt/rsync/bin/rsync /etc/hosts targethost::bkp/ I get: cannot create .hosts.b0WX1x : File exists I check the targethost and I get empty file .hosts.b0WX1x When trying with other targethost-s it works, but on this one it doesn't. On the other targethosts I have exactly the same LinuX distribution, permissions and users than on the problem targethost. I have exactly the

Dear R developers: I am trying to add a column to a data.frame. The following does the trick by expanding the name of the first data frame with the prefix foo: > data.frame(foo = as.list(data.frame(items = 1:3, bar=1:3)), items = 1:3) foo.items foo.bar items 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 However, the following special case produces an

The first one, i.e. "optimal"; check help for match.arg() for the idiom. -pd > On 2 Oct 2017, at 11:48 , Ashim Kapoor <ashimkapoor at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear All, > > I am trying to use the function ses from the forecast package. > > From its help I have : > > Usage: > > ses(y, h = 10, level = c(80, 95), fan = FALSE, initial =

I have written a module pass. When I use the debug pass structure option, the name of my module pass is printed but then I get "Unnamed pass" when the FunctionPassManagerImpl *FPP calls dumpPassStructure (in PassManager.cpp). Is this the expected behavior, or should I be concerned that there is an error in my approach? Thanks, Scott

Hi Martin, package arules heavily relies on ngCMatrix and uses multiplication and addition for logical operations. I think it makes sense that in a mixed operation with one dgCMatrix and one ngCMatrix the ngCMatrix should be "promoted" to a dgCMatrix. The current behavior of %*% and friends is in deed confusing: > m <- matrix(sample(c(0,1), 5*5, replace=TRUE), nrow=5) >

I suggest, you read: Forecasting: principles and practice from Hyndman-Athana?sopou?los https://www.otexts.org/fpp

Update: the "unnamed pass" is PostDominatorTree. My module pass requires PDT (specified in its getAnalysisUsage). When it visits a function, it calls getAnalysis<PostDominatorTree>(), which triggers the failed assertion "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was not 'required' by pass!" This issue has been addressed on this mailing list, but it seems the

Hi, I had a question about this as well. The documentation about writing a pass shows an example like what John wrote, calling a function pass within a module pass on a per function basis. However, if I code it that way, I still get the same error: opt: /x/jeffhao/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:232: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*,

Solved... For the record, there were two issues: 1) I was not passing the Function to getAnalysis for the PDT. 2) I was attempting to getAnalysis on external functions. On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Scott Ricketts<sricketts at maxentric.com> wrote: > Update: the "unnamed pass" is PostDominatorTree. My module pass > requires PDT (specified in its getAnalysisUsage). When it

Hi, My name is Curtis and I'm a 1st year student in Biochemistry at the University of Geneva. I need some help completing the code for my NEWTON ALGORITHM. It is a bonus exercice to our autumn semester maths exam and we can hand it in or not. Usually people copy and paste but I decided to sit down and review theory and ask for help left right and center. My problem is that I cannot get my

On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jeff Yeong-Peng Hao wrote: > > Hi, > > I had a question about this as well. The documentation about > writing a > pass shows an example like what John wrote, calling a function pass > within > a module pass on a per function basis. However, if I code it that > way, I > still get the same error: > > opt:

In PHP something like: $pid = pcntl_fork(); if ($pid != 0) { // we are the parent // do parent stuff exit; } // we are the child, detatch from terminal $sid = posix_setsid(); if ($sid < 0) { die; } // do child stuff On 04/19/2019 02:00 PM, Mark Wiater wrote: > On 4/19/2019 1:49 PM, Dovid Bender wrote: >> Mark, >> >> I am using PHP agi and when forking

Sure. I've attached the code for the test pass I wrote, as well as the code and bitcode for the testcase I'm running. All the functionality has been stripped out of the pass, and the pass compiles without a problem, but the error appears when the pass is run. Jeff On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:06:44 -0800, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Jeff

Hello. I have a general question regarding to clustering of association rules. According to http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/arules/vignettes/arules.pdf "4.7 Distance based clustering transactions and associations" there is possibility for creating clusters of association rules. I do not understand, how I have to interpret clusters of rules. Let us have next association rules and

The following dump-core patches changes its format into ELF, adds PFN-GMFN table, HVM support, and adds experimental IA64 support. - ELF format Program header and note section are adopted. - HVM domain support To know the memory area to dump, XENMEM_set_memory_map is added. XENMEM_memory_map hypercall is for current domain, so new one is created. and hvm domain builder tell xen its

Hi, I am intending to save a path-describing character object in a slot of a class I'm working on. In order to have the option to use "system.file" etc in such string-saved path definitions, I wrote this ExpressionEvaluator <- function(x){ x <- tryCatch( expr=base::parse(text=x), error = function(e){return(as.expression(x))}, finally=TRUE) return(x) } This

I've some demand data, for which I wish to judge what will be the direction in the forecast period (Up/Down). What will be a best ML method to do this? Currently I'm using the data given below - 9/4/2016 241 9/11/2016 233 9/18/2016 226 9/25/2016 282 10/2/2016 291 10/9/2016 282 10/16/2016 308 10/23/2016 291 10/30/2016 268 11/6/2016 262 11/13/2016 273 11/20/2016 262 11/27/2016 309 12/4/2016

Hi Jakob, I have spent last 4 weeks trying to figure out how to implement Interprocedural Register Allocation. I must admit that I was really overwhelmed with LLVM's codebase while trying to figure this out :) There is so much to know! I think I have reached a point where I have some sort of basic understanding of what needs to be done, but I need some help from here on. So here is the

I read the documentation below to mean that: solve_TSP( tsp_input, '2-opt', rep=99 ) will use the 2-opt method on the tsp_input variable 99 times. Catch: I get an "unused input" error. Q: Am I reading the docs (Item 1, below) correctly or is this a problem with solve_TSP ignoring its inputs (Item 2, below). Item 1: solve_TSP doc: > library(TSP) >