similar to: R2spec woes

On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 02:35, Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jos?, > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > > > I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. > > > > I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files

Hi Jos?, On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. > > I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files > irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. > I would like to update this, but I'd also like to grab Jason's

Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that generates it. Hope it helps. I?aki On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:35, Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote: > > I could do so, but it wouldn't be until this weekend. > > Also,

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 12:38, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 6 July 2020 21.08.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to > > build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. > > > > Tom > > I have re/built them using the side tag but I do not

On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 19:01, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.42.10 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that > > generates it. Hope

On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 19:03, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 29 June 2020 13.46.02 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > But the mass rebuild process is very different, because releng doesn't > > follow any particular order (they don't need to, because nothing > > really changed). > > > > The question is whether there is any tool

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 11:05, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Friday, 3 July 2020 18.36.17 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Nice! What if we create a group "R" on Pagure and a repo > > "fedora-scripts" or something like that? > > I would like to improve the scripts but FWIW here it comes a rough version of > the script I used.

On Thursday, 14 May 2020 21.30.13 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > Mmmh... but then you have to change that in the packages' SPEC and > rebuild them anyway when you update R. So... what's the advantage of > this? We already have other examples of how to do this with less steps. :-) Create macros like %{r_sitearch} %{r_sitelib} that expand with the R version being used and place them

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 14:25, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > Again you guessed right, that was the main idea. :-) > As I told above and to reiterate it, the idea of this work is to make it easier to automate the > process. Similarly to how we do the mass builds for all the packages. But the mass rebuild process is very different, because releng doesn't

On Monday, 11 May 2020 16.47.55 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > AFAIK, there's this commitment only for patch versions. In fact, the > path for the personal library is: > > ~/R/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-library/<major>.<minor>/ > > so, when you install a new minor version, you don't have any package > in your personal library. Most of the time, for many packages,

FYI, I plan on implementing this for F31 if no issues arise. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Ben Cotton <bcotton at redhat.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 10:55 Subject: Fedora 31 System-Wide change proposal: Automatic R runtime dependencies To: <devel-announce at lists.fedoraproject.org>, Development discussions related to Fedora <devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote: > > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western > > Europe time zone. > > Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli > interfaces: > >

Hi Jos?, On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 20:05, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Friday, 26 June 2020 00.45.46 WEST Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > Thanks for starting off builds. However, please be careful merging to > > master, as some packages were bumped and have incompatibilities that > > should not be put in stable releases. I will try to come

Is there somewhere a succinct guide to just how much extra crud we need to install on RHEL to make use of EPEL packages? [root at troll-1 noarch]# rpm -ivh R2spec-4.1.0-1.el6.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: fedora-packager is needed by R2spec-4.1.0-1.el6.noarch [root at troll-1 noarch]# wget http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/fedora-packager-0.5.9.4-1.el6.noarch.rpm

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 13:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.42.10 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that > > generates it. Hope

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 09:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit <update> --addbuilds <builds> > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbuilds to use > --from-tag since then

On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 13:03, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 29 June 2020 13.46.02 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > But the mass rebuild process is very different, because releng doesn't > > follow any particular order (they don't need to, because nothing > > really changed). > > > > The question is whether there is any tool

There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mailing list where a user had problems updating R 4.0.2: "non-rpm R libraries not accessible now w R v 4.0.x" https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users at lists.fedoraproject.org/ thread/2FFST3GWZCNM45SX53VKB255TO4LOV4C/ TLDR; as far as I can see the user had installed (as root) a package from cran and had installed

On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.44.14 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > Oh, and maybe in this process we could add to all packages the > requirement on R(ABI) = 4 that Tom implemented. For that we need to start with rawhide and then change the R-rpm-macros package. Probably it should be enough to change the /usr/lib/rpm/R-deps.R script to add Requires: R(ABI)=4.0 I suggest to continue this as is

On Thursday, 9 July 2020 21.25.05 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > CRAN rebuilt on Copr. Ready to push to stable. The update also has the karma necessary to be pushed to stable. Does any one has any objection for this to be pushed to stable? If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western Europe time zone, and yes we are in the Summer and the days are larger) in time for