similar to: Build rpm package for R-MKL

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/07/2015 06:16 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I >> follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use >> the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. >> >> I am left with this error: >> >>

After a few days of reading and headache, I finally gave a try at building R from source with Intel MKL and ICC. Documentation and posts on this topic are rather incomplete, sometime fantasist et do not give much explanations about configure options. As I am not sure if mine is correct, I would appreciate some advices and hints. OS: Fedora 22 parallel_studio_xe_2016 Hardware : 8 Thread(s) per

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 20:49 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:35 PM, arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com> wrote: > > After a few days of reading and headache, I finally gave a try at > > building R from source with Intel MKL and ICC. Documentation and posts > > on this topic are rather incomplete, sometime fantasist et do not give > >

On 09/07/2015 06:16 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I > follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use > the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. > > I am left with this error: > > ------------------------------------------ > installing R info pages ... > updating '/usr/share/info/dir' ... >

I built R form source succesfully on my Fedora 22 box. No errors. I can read there is an issue with some manuals at build time when running makeinfo, especially these two: doc/manual/R-exts.texi cp doc/manual/R-intro.texi Some distro have hacks about makeinfo 5 in their build script. I wonder if some manuals are broken but couldn't see it when running make. May someone tells me more about

On Sat, 2015-09-05 at 11:53 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Martyn Plummer <plummerm at iarc.fr> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 20:49 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:35 PM, arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > After a few days of reading and headache, I finally gave a try at

Hi there, I initially asked about this on r-help and was told this might be a better venue. I?m not really convinced from reading the posting guide, but I?ll give it a shot. It was also suggested that the R-Project doesn?t really care about building with ?non-standard? compilers, but I can?t find any evidence of that on the website (indeed, there?s some mention of successful past builds, and the

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Martyn Plummer <plummerm at iarc.fr> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 20:49 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:35 PM, arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com> wrote: >> > After a few days of reading and headache, I finally gave a try at >> > building R from source with Intel MKL and ICC. Documentation

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:35 PM, arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com> wrote: > After a few days of reading and headache, I finally gave a try at > building R from source with Intel MKL and ICC. Documentation and posts > on this topic are rather incomplete, sometime fantasist et do not give > much explanations about configure options. > As I am not sure if mine is

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Nathan Kurz <nate at verse.com> wrote: > Hi Arnaud -- > > I'm glad it's working for you. I'm not sure I understand your final > answer. Are you saying that the version I posted worked for you as > given, or that you had to remove some of the other options? I say it works perfectly when using the single dynamic library (lmkl_rt):

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Nathan Kurz <nate at verse.com> wrote: > > As a short and simple approach, I just compiled the current R release > on Ubuntu with ICC and MKL using just this: > > $ tar -xzf R-3.2.2.tar.gz > $ cd R-3.2.2 > $ CC=icc CXX=icpc AR=xiar LD=xild CFLAGS="-g -O3 -xHost" CXXFLAGS="-g > -O3 -xHost" ./configure

I want to build R optimized, with either MKL, OpenBLAS or ATLAS. My OS: Fedora 22 Hardware: CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 8 Thread(s) per core: 2 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz I am a little confused when it comes to choose a method and would like to hear your experiences. If I am right, I have 3 possibilities: -

G'day all, after issuing `svn up' on my machine this morning, I noticed that `make info' choked on R-exts.texi. Below is a patch that seems to solve the problem. BTW, while `make info' runs now, I still get the following warning: /usr/bin/makeinfo --enable-encoding -D UseExternalXrefs -I/opt/src/R-devel-src/doc/manual /opt/src/R-devel-src/doc/manual/R-exts.texi

Hi, I have seen a lot of problems from people trying to compile R with MKL. So I am writing my experience in case it helps and to ask one question. I installed R-2.8.1.patched in Ubuntu 9.04 (gcc 4.3.3) using MKL 10.1.1.019. I configured correctly (following MKL userguide) with : sudo ./configure --with-blas="-I/opt/intel/mkl/10.1.1.019/include -L/opt/intel/mkl/10.1.1.019/lib/em64t

Hi, I have seen a lot of problems from people trying to compile R with MKL. So I am writing my experience in case it helps and to ask one question. I installed R-2.8.1.patched in Ubuntu 9.04 (gcc 4.3.3) using MKL 10.1.1.019. I configured correctly (following MKL userguide) with : sudo ./configure --with-blas="-I/opt/intel/mkl/10.1.1.019/include -L/opt/intel/mkl/10.1.1.019/lib/em64t

Hello, This is what "Writing R extensions" currently says about R_atof and R_strtod: >> Function: void R_atof (const char* str) >> Function: void R_strtod (const char* str, char ** end) >> >> Implementations of the C99/POSIX functions atof and strtod which >> guarantee platform-dependent behaviour, including always using the >> period as the decimal

Hi everyone, Being new to the crowd of R users I am wondering what the equivalent of attach("/home/bla/hoffmann/R/.RData",2) (S style) is in R. What I want is a split of .RData repositories. One in a central place where I keep functions and interesting stuff important for all work I am doing, an several others which contain stuff of an dividual project only. When I start in a

I believe should be February 2020 not 2010 --- a/doc/manual/R-exts.texi +++ b/doc/manual/R-exts.texi @@ -2631,9 +2631,9 @@ not necessarily installed) on all known @R{} platforms. As from @R{} 4.0.0 a C++ compiler will be selected only if it conforms to the 2011 standard (`C++11'). A minor update at footnote{The changes are linked from

Hello, Today, Brian Ripley commited the revision 50000 of R's svn repository. I took this as an opportunity to do some data analysis of the log and posted some code and graphics on my blog: http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr/index.php?post/2009/10/09/celebrating-R-commit-50000 The plots of the number of commits per day (and per month) indicates a peak in 2002. Here are the top 20

In C++ code for use in a R-3.1.0 package, my specific problem is that I would like to use <unordered_map> if it is available, or <tr1/unordered_map> if not, or <map> if all else fails. I (think I) can accomplish this with configure.ac as AC_INIT("DESCRIPTION") CXX=`"${R_HOME}/bin/R" CMD config CXX` CXXFLAGS=`"${R_HOME}/bin/R" CMD config