I believe should be February 2020 not 2010 --- a/doc/manual/R-exts.texi +++ b/doc/manual/R-exts.texi @@ -2631,9 +2631,9 @@ not necessarily installed) on all known @R{} platforms. As from @R{} 4.0.0 a C++ compiler will be selected only if it conforms to the 2011 standard (`C++11'). A minor update at footnote{The changes are linked from @uref{https://isocpp.org/@/std/@/standing-documents/@/sd-6-sg10-feature-test-recommendations}.} -(`C++14') was published in December 2014. The latest standard (`C++17') -was published in December 2017, and a further revision (`C++20') is in -preparation. +(`C++14') was published in December 2014. A revision (`C++17') was +published in December 2017, and a further revision (`C++20', with many +new features) is scheduled for February 2010.
>>>>> Hugh Parsonage writes:Thanks: fixed now. Best -k> I believe should be February 2020 not 2010 > --- a/doc/manual/R-exts.texi > +++ b/doc/manual/R-exts.texi > @@ -2631,9 +2631,9 @@ not necessarily installed) on all known @R{} > platforms. As from @R{} > 4.0.0 a C++ compiler will be selected only if it conforms to the 2011 > standard (`C++11'). A minor update at footnote{The changes are linked from > @uref{https://isocpp.org/@/std/@/standing-documents/@/sd-6-sg10-feature-test-recommendations}.}> -(`C++14') was published in December 2014. The latest standard (`C++17') > -was published in December 2017, and a further revision (`C++20') is in > -preparation. > +(`C++14') was published in December 2014. A revision (`C++17') was > +published in December 2017, and a further revision (`C++20', with many > +new features) is scheduled for February 2010.> ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel