similar to: admin console

Philipp Schafft, who allow you to publish my private message? > Remove > > -Pete > > > On Feb 13, 2020, at 8:46 AM, Philipp Schafft <lion at lion.leolix.org> wrote: > > > > ???Good afternoon, > > > > please have a look into your MUA setup. You keep breaking threading for > > this thread (In-Reply-To header is set incorrectly). > >

2020-01-08 09:59, Marvin Scholz wrote: > >> On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 10:24 +0000, user wrote: > > > > I'm consider to put icecast behind reverse proxy. It is not so easy as I > > think before. Does anyone have experience with it? > > In general putting Icecast behind a reverse proxy is not the best idea as > some webservers are not really made out of the box

> On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 14:59 +0000, user wrote: > > Philipp Schafft, who allow you to publish my private message? > > I could also ask who allowed you to send me unwanted private messages? At this point any message from Philipp Schafft to me becomes absolutely unwanted. > In fact I did not notice it was sent privately until after my reply. It Notice can be found on third

While doing a security audit on a system I maintain, I stumbled upon an unvalidated use of a variable to compose an Originate request to the local Asterisk instance via AMI. Taking as an example an earlier exploit for FreePBX, I realized that this, combined with Application: System as an injected value, could allow arbitrary code execution. I am in the process of fixing all instances of this bug

IPS HLBR - Version 1.0 can detect malicious traffic using regular expressions Version 1.0 of Hogwash Light BR, released march 5th 2006, brings two interesting new features. The first one is the ability of using regular expressions to detect intrusion attempts and e-mails with virus or phishing. The second is the use of lists with banned words. HLBR is an IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) that

Hi, David Greene wrote: > After the successful launch of the Jaguar machine (the fastest for > open science, http://www.cray.com/Products/XT/Product/ORNLJaguar.aspx) > we're working toward the next leap in computational power. > Slight off-topic, but when I try to open the above link in Firefox 3 I get a big fat "Reported Attack Site! This web site at www.cray.com has been

I got those warnings today (and stopped browsing) but not the first time David sent the message so I suspect the site got infected very recently. --Vikram Associate Professor, Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://llvm.org/~vadve On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Paul Melis wrote: > Hi, > > David Greene wrote: >> After the successful launch of the

Hello, I'm asking if there is a way to do extra troubleshooting for admin auth, by adjusting a config parameter (i.e. loglevel), then looking at log files. Sometimes I can auth properly when trying to update metadata using a url with basic auth embedded before the server/hostname, requested from a web browser like google chrome. i.e. http://admin:password at

On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On 04/14/2016 01:19 PM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > > There is no /root/.ssh/authorized_keys on remote host, so I have to > > authenticate with password. > > > > On the remote host: > > > > # /usr/sbin/sshd -T | egrep permitroot > > permitrootlogin yes > > > > Attempting: > > > >

1. Systems affected: All versions of OpenSSH between 2.0 and 3.0.2 contain an off-by-one error in the channel code. OpenSSH 3.1 and later are not affected. 2. Impact: This bug can be exploited locally by an authenticated user logging into a vulnerable OpenSSH server or by a malicious SSH server attacking a vulnerable OpenSSH client. 3. Solution: Upgrade to

1. Systems affected: All versions of OpenSSH between 2.0 and 3.0.2 contain an off-by-one error in the channel code. OpenSSH 3.1 and later are not affected. 2. Impact: This bug can be exploited locally by an authenticated user logging into a vulnerable OpenSSH server or by a malicious SSH server attacking a vulnerable OpenSSH client. 3. Solution: Upgrade to

reflum, On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 09:29 +0200, R?cker Thomas wrote: > On 20/02/13 19:38, Alexandru Matei wrote: > > A week ago I had a blocked icecast server because of the open files. I > > read some posts about the 1024 fd limit but this is not the case. My > > stations rarely has 300 listeners. From the log I can see that around > > 3PM I had 7 listeners on a mount and

Afternoon All, Today rolled a pre-production box from Trunk back to 1.4.7 (In an attempt to get a working SCCP channel). During the process Music On Hold appears to have died (Not, just when calling from a SCCP device, but coming in on SIP also). CLI is showing -- Executing [XXXXXXXX at unauthed-inbound:2] MusicOnHold("SIP/10.97.1.33-09f0cfc8", "sounds") in new stack

Hi. I have a problem with the icecast. When I activate the service I am having an exesive consumption in the ip queries. It seems like a DDOS attack. How can I mitigate this attack? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20180605/bd03e5eb/attachment.htm>

I ask because I only receive attacks when I activate icecast. I can not do anything at the application level ?. i used ubuntu server 16.04. thanks. 2018-06-05 14:52 GMT-05:00 Alejandro Flores <alex at mordormx.net>: > I think you should contact to your connectivity provider, hopefully they > can provide you the Anti DDOS protection. > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 2:16 PM,

I read this in a previous post ( http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2006-December/002354.html) .... First, Mongrel accepts remote clients and creates one Thread for each request. Mongrel also enforces a single request/response using Connect:close headers because Ruby only supports 1024 files (so far). If Mongrel doesn''t do this then people like yourself can write a simple

On 6/5/07, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > > To be honest, while I understand your questions, I do not understand the > context in which you are asking them. Are you asking if LLVM provides > any facilities to provide these protections, or are you asking if we've > added any special features to LLVM (or to SVA; our research work based > on LLVM) to

Server software firewall cannot help with ddos attacks. Basically if those are indeed ddos attacks you’ll have to look into mitigation solutions which are quite expensive. CloudFlare won’t work as well since they do not support streaming. You should consider getting a server at a data center which provide ddos mitigation, I know that OVH’s mitigation is quite good. בתאריך יום ג׳, 5 ביוני 2018

well, on a large enough scale, it won't matter even if the server drops them, it will clog the nic way before it even gets to the server.. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:40 AM Roman <romeo.r at gmail.com> wrote: > > вт, 5 июн. 2018 г., 23:17 Yahav Shasha <yahav.shasha at gmail.com>: > >> Server software firewall cannot help with ddos attacks. >> > > I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Xen Security Advisory XSA-57 version 3 libxl allows guest write access to sensitive console related xenstore keys UPDATES IN VERSION 3 ==================== Public release. ISSUE DESCRIPTION ================= The libxenlight (libxl) toolstack library does not correctly set permissions on