similar to: Silence Detection for stream - Linux (Ubuntu 12.04/14.04) ALSA ONLY

Hello, I only know a nice tool for JACK, called silentjack. So if by any chance, you find the strength to use JACK anyway, here is the source code : http://www.aelius.com/njh/silentjack/ The code is very light and simple : if you have some programming skills, you might even adapt it for ALSA. Sorry for this OT answer. Hoggins! Le 09/08/2014 02:39, Dean Sauer a ?crit : > Looking to

On 08/09/2014 12:39 AM, Dean Sauer wrote: > Looking to find something that can do silence detection on a feed from > Icecast 2.3.2 with a silence detection period passed as a variable > > ie: sd my.server.invalid:8000/mymount -t 20m -s /home/myuser/sendalart.sh > > > On detection of silence exceeding this period it calls /home/myuser/ > sendalart.sh to send an email, or

Le 24/08/2014 10:30, Dean Sauer a ?crit : > jack and the companion feces of pulseaudio are not present on my systems > or allowed, ever, period. Wow. That makes me want to post help on this list soooo badly next time you ask. I mentioned JACK because the tool is JACK enabled, but that you could also adapt it. Adults on this list have, for the most part, already passed through that anal

On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 04:32:27PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > I'm about to (finally) do my first Asterisk install; SMB, 4 FXO, 4-6 > stations, mostly IP (I'm looking at the Grandstream 201, to start), and > maybe X-lite on a couple of laptops via VPN. > > We've got a 4xFXO box we bought off eBay, which unfortunately I can't > find to quote a model number off

There was a flurry of "Vonage is going to unlock SIP" activity last year; did anything productive ever come of it? Are *you* using your Vonage lines directly into Asterisk? In lieu of that, for a 4 line small business that doesn't need to pay Vonage $150 a month, who? Broadvoice? Someone else? I'm a touch unimpressed with the fact that BV's website *won't quote you

Been working with Samba back to 1.9 or so, but this is the first time I've tried to set it up as a domain member server. I followed (I think) the instructions on how to do this in TOSHARG (which are about as disjointed as the book, which I took back), but I continue to be unable to get the box, running winbind, to reliably authenticate users off the PDC, which is running NT4 (and I'm not

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 01:25:43PM -0400, Donny Kavanagh wrote: > This is getting downright abusive, and is totally uncalled for, this > is not a list for personal attacks. You thought that Steve suggesting JT step in was abusive? If that's not what you meant, then you need to either a) be clearer, or b) reply to the proper message. And hackers ignoring pleasantries to get right down

hi all, I hope you can help me with a strange quota/nfs/XFS behavior... I'm using Centos 5.6 on both a nfs server and client. Both are 64-bit, and using a recent kernel: NFS server: Linux fs2.priv 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux NFS client: Linux nx8.priv 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64

This seems like a piece members of this list would find interesting... === There is growing concern over the interaction of VoIP systems with the legacy PSTN, and the transmission of caller identity data--most notably, Caller ID on the PSTN. It is not always possible, or obvious how, to handle Caller ID data when moving to or from VoIP and the PSTN networks. There are even business models

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:27:14PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > James FitzGibbon wrote: > > Let me ask a question myself: what kind of regression test does * undergo > > before release, and what level of traffic gets put through stuff like > > app_queue? I assume it's not real-world scale, else these hard to pin down > > concurrency issues we're seeing would

I suppose you were pointing me towards the "burst-size" setting, but it's not totally clear. Please correct me if you meant something else. I increased the burst-size to 131072 bytes, or 128 kibibytes. My Android app now plays the stream without much delay. I still don't know why I didn't notice this problem in an Android emulator. Thanks for the pointer. From: