Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80000 matches similar to: "remove my email id from list"
2004 Aug 06
0
[PATCH] - Make reopening of Log files
independent from Configuration Reload
In-Reply-To: <200406161051.03808.msmith@xiph.org>
References: <1087307353.28637.11.camel@forge.intermeta.de>
<200406161051.03808.msmith@xiph.org>
Message-ID: <1087392799.7778.4.camel@forge.intermeta.de>
Hi,
yes, I tested the patch. Then I sent you the wrong version. I attached
the correct one. Yes, this one works.
Why just reopening
2004 Aug 06
3
slow streaming
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:15:32 +1100
Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2004 08:02, ianux wrote:
> > hi,
> > here is my configuration :
> > I've got a NATed network through a linux box
> > the icecast server is running on the router
> > I'm running ices 2.0 beta 4 on my own box
> > everything seems to work fine, BUT:
2004 Aug 06
2
ices can't logon to server
Do you mean ices 0.2.3? If so, I'm still getting the same error.
<p>On December 12, 2002 18:34, msmith@labyrinth.net.au wrote:
> Duke <list_usr@spacebox.net> said:
> > I'm certain I've got everything configured correctly, however, I keep
> > getting the following message when trying to run ices:
>
> ices 0.x doesn't use the same protocol as
2004 Aug 06
2
ices can't logon to server
Where can I get ice2? (Seems ices2 doesn't actually exist.) is it useable?
>Fromwhat I found on google, the cvs web listing says the code hasn't been
touched in 22 months, and that it's mostly incomplete.
Should I just use icescast and ices?
<p><p>On December 12, 2002 22:05, msmith@labyrinth.net.au wrote:
> Duke <list_usr@spacebox.net> said:
> > Do
2004 Aug 06
3
icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
There isn't much info on the website...I guess I was expecting some beter documentattion.
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org>
To: icecast@xiph.org
Cc:
Date:
Subject: Re: [icecast] icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 14:01, ronnie@mixsessions.com wrote:
> okay those are good reasons but where can I get more info
>
>
The
2004 Aug 06
1
slow streaming
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:15:32 +1100
Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org> wrote:
<p>> > Do I need more bandwith? I have xDSL with about 512K of upload
> > bandwith with in fact 96-128K available for icecast. What is the
> > needed bandwidth for every listener and for a standard quality ?
> >
>
> Well, if you're streaming at 48 kbps, then it's 48 kbps
2004 Nov 02
1
ICECast in Flash / IEWin
Hello,
Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org>:
>
> We don't sent a content-length header because there's no way to know the
> content length in advance - it's a stream, after all!
I kown this, after more than 1 hour the flash player stop to play. But during 1
hour It's possible to listen music, better than hearing nothing.
> > So, I made a small PHP proxy and
2004 Aug 06
0
directory servers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Smith [mailto:msmith@xiph.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:02 AM
> To: icecast@xiph.org
> Subject: Re: [icecast] Please confirm your message
>
>
>
> >Are you serious???
> >
> >The development state of "Icecast 1" vs. Icecast2 has
> *nothing* to do with the
> >web site. Not from a
2004 Aug 06
3
icecast 1.3 or 2 ???
Hi
This poses a different question
icecast 1.X is the one I see at icecast.org
icecast2 - is this available as alph ?? and is this better to install now that 1.X as I did not see this on the site
I have icecast 1.x running on a test box but setting up an new box with icecast on and wondering if its better to go with V2 and
wondaring how stable etc it is - relay just want somting that works :-)
2004 Aug 06
2
icecast2 ogg vorbis client request headers
This may be of help,
im tailing the error log file and im getting these errors
[2004-04-01 19:14:35] DBUG source/source_main Client added
[2004-04-01 19:14:38] DBUG source/source_main Client had unrecoverable
error with new data, probably due to client disconnection
[2004-04-01 19:14:38] DBUG source/source_main Client removed
<p><p>Dave St John
Mediacast1 Administration
Need
2004 Aug 06
0
icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
yes I got that info
<p>----- Original Message -----
From: M Edwards <medwards@ualberta.ca>
To: <icecast@xiph.org>
Cc:
Date:
Subject: RE: [icecast] icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
If you search the archives someone posted an unofficial howto to get icecast2
started. Was immensely helpful on the config file side of things. I then
stumbled across a short specification on the ices
2004 Oct 18
2
ICECast in Flash / IEWin
Alternatively you can just script the window media player control, and bind
it to your stream, that should work just fine, assuming you have my
directshow filters installed.
Zen.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@xiph.org>
To: "Ian Andrew Bell" <hello@ianbell.com>; "icecast" <icecast@xiph.org>
Sent: Monday, October 18,
2004 Aug 06
0
Antwort: Re: icecast + liveice won't play nicely
@ben:
try "tar xzf foo.tar.gz"
daniel ditgens
<p><p>
Ben Timby
<btimby_indy@ An: icecast@xiph.org
2004 Aug 06
0
icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
thanks!
----- Original Message -----
From: Kerry Cox <kerry.cox@ksl.com>
To: Icecast mailing list <icecast@xiph.org>
Cc:
Date:
Subject: Re: [icecast] icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
<p>--=-yzJC+pyJDj1RouYtMnAL
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You may want to try my site at http://quasi.ksl.com/icecast/. There is
also a link to a legacy page that
2007 Mar 28
1
Re: Icecast-dev Digest, Vol 33, Issue 5
sir,
i have connected multiple clients with he server.i dont know how to
play that simultaneously as i m receiving the stream.live playback?
On 3/29/07, icecast-dev-request@xiph.org <icecast-dev-request@xiph.org>
wrote:
>
> Send Icecast-dev mailing list submissions to
> icecast-dev@xiph.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
2004 Aug 06
1
icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
okay those are good reasons but where can I get more info
<p>----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Smith" <msmith@labyrinth.net.au>
To: <icecast@xiph.org>
Cc:
Date:
Subject: Re: [icecast] icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
ronnie@mixsessions.com said:
> upgrade to icecast2? Should I?
>
>
> I have found alot on info on icecast 1.x. I am familiar with how
2004 Aug 06
0
icecast 1.x vs icecast 2
If you search the archives someone posted an unofficial howto to get icecast2
started. Was immensely helpful on the config file side of things. I then
stumbled across a short specification on the ices config file which helped me
figure out how to properly hook up a perl script to ices.
>===== Original Message From <ronnie@mixsessions.com> =====
>okay those are good reasons but
2004 Aug 06
0
Ices2; Metadata and special chars
I have the same problem with status.xsl. Special characters such as “é” are
truncated.
Is there any solution?
Cheers,
MAX
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org] On Behalf Of
Ross Levis
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 4:58 AM
To: icecast@xiph.org
Subject: Re: [icecast] Ices2; Metadata and special chars
I reported this several months
2011 Feb 24
0
We can not start up icecast
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Michael Smith wrote:
> To: Luis Barrett <getpaid00 at gmail.com>
> From: Michael Smith <msmith at xiph.org>
> Subject: Re: [Icecast] We can not start up icecast
>
> When you get this error message, further details are available in the
> icecast error log, unless you've disabled error logging.
>
> If you've disabled error logging,
2004 Aug 06
2
icecast 1.3 or 2 ???
> You can get an October 10 alpha release from www.xiph.org/~msmith/ or you
> can get the latest code from the xiph.org CVS repository (visit
> http://www.xiph.org/cvs.html (module icecast). documentation is almost
> non-existant for icecast2 so if you hit any trouble, ask here.
>
> Geoff.
This is true. There is no solid documentation for icecast2, yet.
However, there are some