similar to: Static files with Icecast2

You just make a config entry in the icecast2 xml file saying which directory to use as the web root. e.g. if you give /local/music, then a file called /local/music/ska/Specials.ogg would be streamed from the url http://your.server:8000/ska/Specials.ogg I don't think it makes the m3u/pls files, but you can do that in the script that makes your web pages like you say. On Monday 25 Oct 2004

At 02:48 PM 10/25/2004, you wrote: >You just make a config entry in the icecast2 xml file saying which directory >to use as the web root. e.g. if you give /local/music, then a file >called /local/music/ska/Specials.ogg would be streamed from the url >http://your.server:8000/ska/Specials.ogg >I don't think it makes the m3u/pls files, but you can do that in the script >that

On Monday 24 February 2003 17:32, Deva Seetharam wrote: > Hello > > using icecast1, it was possible to serve static music files. from my > prelim understanding, it seems like icecast2 can serve only streams. is > this correct? > No. icecast2 fully supports serving of static files. Mike --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage:

I guess as a mercy plee for help I'll mention why I need to have the static ogg files play as the mp3 static files play with icecast1. I'm the founder of the LPBN and I've recently made Richard Stallman's files available as downloads (it is a work that is still in process). Stallman has requested I make them available as streams as well as downloads. So is there anybody out

Hello... Coming from an Icecast 1 background, I tend to like the admin functionality of Icecast1 over Icecast2. Fixing this is but some file editing away, I supposed. I'm trying to simplify the administration screens for myself and co-sysop. In testing, if I copy the listclients.xsl into the web directory, it works like I would like... almost. I get a listing of every stream on the

Behold, Adon Irani <adon@YorkU.CA> hath decreed: > > the icecast2 developers be guilt-tripped into repeating icecast's > performance ? > _ is it not enough that OGG can have a streaming server that supports it ? Perhaps, if that is the only requirement to have a fully-functional streamer. Unfortunately, I believe this is not sufficient for the user base. So, if the

Hi wow for a person just starting this is all exciting - do people here think its better to install icecast2 if it's as stable as you say and start to learn on this and not bother with 1.xxx All we want to do is live broadcast ( icecast on red hat box but we use winamp to get the data too this ) AJB -----Original Message----- From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org]On

> The current homepage is http://www.xiph.org/cvs.html ... this is > supposed to change eventually, but there are some weird problems with > icecast.org that i don't quite understand. :) > > Anyways, do NOT check out icecast2 from icecast.org CVS, it is very > outdated. Instead, check out the 'icecast' module from anoncvs@xiph.org. > > Moritz Sorry...

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > If icecast.org is so broken, then someone ought to do what was > > suggested on the list in November (looking through the archives): > > put it out of its misery. Why are there no "official" releases? > > I already told you, there *are* official releases (or, to be exact, one > release), but

Hello Remco, I found these decumentations before but they say nothing about setting the start time and end time of each mp3 file entry in the .m3u file Best Regards - Johann "Remco B. Brink" schrieb: > <quote who="Johann Soukup"> > > > is there any documentation on the .m3u file definition ? > > Google is your friend (tm): > >

Hi everybody, Assorgia and me, we have worked on the Flash client for Icecast2. We got successful results with: -Windows (Netscape, Mozilla, CompuServe, or Opera) -Macintosh and Linux(Netscape, Internet Explorer for Macintosh, Safari, AOL, Opera, or CompuServe) For Windows (Internet Explorer or AOL) some headers sent by Icecast2 are missing. These headers are sent by Icecast1 but NOT Icecast2

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > the current stable version. Those who are willing to give up the > > features not yet implemented in icecast2 in order to stream vorbis, can > > use the devel version. Those who don't need to stream vorbis can > > continue using the stable version. There is not a good rationality for > > Icecast2 is

I'm relaying an icecast1 mp3 stream with icecast2. This works fine, and the song title is displayed correctly no matter if I use <relay-shoutcast-metadata>1</> or not on the relay. But, the stream name and other metadata provided by ices0 on the icecast1 server is not displayed in the listening client. Icecast1 source: [Id: 1] [Sock: 11] [Time of connect: 09/Aug/2004:10:01:24]

Hello again all. I want to thank Karl H. for pointing me to xiph.org/~karl and getting me some save files winamp likes the first time. That ucler is at an end. The next ucler involves two rather quick questions: I > In icecast1, when a user attempted to connect to the server, didn't it just kick them to the "default stream", where the default stream was the only stream being

> > ( icecast2 only handles .MP3 for fileserving , as far as i know ..) > > Nope. Icecast2 doesn't care about what the format of the files it serves is > for fileserving. (i meant :: .MP3 is handled for fileserving , but .MP3 is not avail for live reencoding, as far as i know .. ) for the record , the OGG streaming w/ icecast2 has been great . tho (seperate issue ) : OGG files

Greetings, I have some confusion. I've seen it mentioned, somewhere in some docs, that Icecast2 does not (as yet) support Push relaying. Is this actually the case? Should I be looking at icecast1 (which does support push relay, I believe) until such capability is implemented on icecast2? Or should I be creating a combination of both? Or what? Here's my situation: I have a customer

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > > Well, I think saying that Xiph.org doesn't care about its users at all > is too harsh. On the other hand, there's some truth in this, and I > highly appreciate it. If you want to stick to MP3, Icecast1 is for you - > nobody forces you to use it (or not), and you're also free to use > something else. Xiph.org, i.e. Jack

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > or developing for it. The fact that no release packages are available > > signifies to me that icecast2 is not yet ready for prime time. This > > Well, there are, see Geoff's mail ... those are official. Multiple > problems of pretty much any kind prevented Xiph.org from getting > icecast.org in order; I

Hi, My stream is up and running until today evening somewhen (CET). http://scapa.dnsalias.net/oggmusic.m3u or directly: http://scapa.dnsalias.net:8066/test.ogg It's tested already, so it should work, but I don't know much about the reliability yet. Icecast1 unreproduceable segfaulted on me sometimes and that's what I want to know with Icecast2, too. It DID segfault today, but only

Hi, I have installed the Icecast2 on my Ubuntu Linux and I was not able to figure out how I could stream static mp3 files. Can anybody help me? What should I do to do this? I put the mp3 file in the webroot and I tried to retrieve it with the " http://host:port/try.mp3" URL but I could only download it (as a whole) but not as a streamed media. Do I have to convert the mp3 to another