similar to: Problem with shorewall two interface setup and a router

Hey all, A while ago today I posted about not being able to get my two interface setup working with a router (di 652 wireless/wired). I recieved help from Tom and got everything in the router turned off and set it up as a switch rather then a rouiter, this still never corrected my problems. Use tcpdump I see there is alot of traffic, but as soon as I dhcpcd eth1 (local) I loose all outside access

​The qemu that I am using isn't modified at all. It's the VHOST drivers that are mounted elsewhere i.e., not on default /dev/vhost-net. Here is the command that I use to launch my qemu VM: qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host -boot order=c -hda /root/Disks/ubuntu1.qcow2 -m 1024M -smp 2 --enable-kvm -name 'client 1' -nographic -vnc :2 -net none -no-reboot -mem-path /dev/hugepages

Here''s my situation: I''ve got an Intel machine running a 2.6.9 linux kernel and this box has 4 modems attached to it via a usb to serial port expander. In order to force data down each of the modems, some pretty simple rules are used and they are as follows: iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport $PORT1 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport

Currently in the VM XML, I am passing the following command line argument as a passthrough argument: -netdev type=tap,id=net1,script=no,downscript=no,ifname=port3,vhost=on -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=net1,mac=00:00:00:00:00:01,csum=off,gso=off,guest_tso4=off,guest_tso6=off,guest_ecn=off Is there another way to represent this in the XML file? maybe that may solve the problem. On 24 July 2014

Hello everyone! How are you? Hope you''re well :) Here''s my setup at home: Internet -> (eth1) Comp1 (shorewall, DHCP, dns server, Internet sharing) (eth0) -> Linksys (wireless) ~~~~~~~~~~~~ (wlan0) Comp2 (eth0) -> IP Phone My computer1 is well confiugred, everything was working right and well. I decided to move the IP Phone to the COmputer 2. I was able to make this

Hi, I have a digium card (igium, Inc. Wildcard TE405P quad-span T1/E1/J1 card 5.0V (rev 02)) 4 ports I want to make a loop test between digium card E1 to test the configuration of dahdi What I want to do scenario is I connect port 1 and port4 in the digium card with E1 cable SIPcall-->E1 Digium port 1--->(Loop)E1 port 2---->sip extension local. kindly can any can help me to

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > seeing if things could be simplified. > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme

Let me clarify my question, I am using unmodified stock qemu (1.4.0) and only the location of vhost file descriptor is different from default (I don't remove the default /dev/vhost-net directory) The VHOST file descriptor is present in "/dev/vhost-0" directory instead of the default "/dev/vhost-net". When I try to give vhostfd in the XML I get a different error:

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:27:58PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > > times over the

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 03:48:06PM +0500, Asadullah Hussain wrote: > Let me clarify my question, I am using unmodified stock qemu (1.4.0) and > only the location of vhost file descriptor is different from default (I > don't remove the default /dev/vhost-net directory) > > The VHOST file descriptor is present in "/dev/vhost-0" directory instead of > the default

At 07:43 AM 6/29/2015, you wrote: >James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Mon, June 29, 2015 02:14, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > OS 6? > >> > >> Please note: I'm not criticizing, just curious about the argument > >> behind using a regular OS to do firewall-stuff. > > > > Maintenance. > > > > A consistent set of expectations does wonders for

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

Hi all how to make a WML view for rails pages? I''ve tried to create like: <wml> <card> CONTENT </card> </wml> but my phone says unsupported content type... thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I've got a small network at home with a topology as follows: -- Cable Modem -- Router 1 -- Switch 1 -- Server 1 | Router 2/Switch 2 --+-- Server 2 | | | WAP 1 --+ +-- WAP 2 +-- Client 1 | +--

> On 30 July 2018 at 20:37 ????? <vtol at gmx.net> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> facing [ no shared cipher ] error with EC private keys. > >>>>>> the client connecting to your instance has to support ecdsa > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> It does - Thunderbird 60.0b10 (64-bit) >

It work's OK but. When I installed a wireless acces point Linksys it does not work. I disabled the firewall in the acces point but with no result. Can anybody help me??? Alejandro G. Schujman AGS Computaci?n y Sistemas contacto@ags.com.ar MSN agschujman@hotmail.com 0341 4219625 Movil 0341 15 5410122

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 1458 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060727/c1c4dc5d/attachment-0001.jpe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available

Hi. I was asked to put a real IP behind a linux router is doing static NAT for an internal network. Internet (gateway) | | | eth0 = real IP ----------------- L I N U X ROUTER ----------------- eth1 = private IP | | | eth0 = real IP ----------------- Wireless Access Point -----------------

UPDATE. The circuit has run clean since the 7th. It seems the telco found a problem after all but they can't tell me what they did... cause they think it was fixed as part of another case. Grrr. Well, I never doubted the T400P too much but I went ahead and bought a different card just in case. Haven't had to use it so far. One of the biggest reasons I did not think the Wildcard was at