similar to: off: live365 relay

Answer to your question: Live365 is strictly mp3 Much more than you wanted to know: I started using Live365 about a zillion years ago and of course it was wonderful "back in the good ole daze". After you signed up with them, you could park 365 meg of mp3s (up to 56k) and/or set up a relay (using either icecast or shoutcast) all for free. (Dirty little secret was at first, although

This is a mail in response to streamripper being threatened by legal action from Live365. The DMCA strikes again. jack. ----- Forwarded message from Fred von Lohmann <fred@vonlohmann.com> ----- Delivered-To: jack@localhost.cantcode.com Delivered-To: jack@icecast.org X-Authentication-Warning: penguin.onehouse.com: majordomo set sender to owner-pho@onehouse.com using -f X-Sent: 31 May 2001

Hi Akos, --- Akos Maroy <darkeye@tyrell.hu> wrote: > well of course, the nanocast server uses some different login > protocol > than icecast or shoutcast. is there a site for this server? maybe a > spec > on the source login protocol? then I could add support for it to > darkice Hmm.. I thought nanocaster was similar to shoutcast? I can use the shoutcast plugin for

Hi all, I'm attempting to stream audio to a live365.com server, more specifically, it is a Nanocaster/2.0 server: HTTP/1.0 200 OK Server: Nanocaster/2.0 Content-Type: audio/mpeg Cache-Control: no-cache Pragma:no-cache Connection: close Content-Length: 44000000 I tried Liveice (XMMS plugin) and it wouldn't connect properly. I tried ices, that too would not work. I even tried DarkIce

Has anyone been succesful using live365 as a relay for icecast and getting listed in the various directories? What would be neat is having a listing in the directories that would either send the listeners straight to live365 or to a page on my web server that would redirect them to live365. Being able to support 365 listeners is a lot better than being able to support 3 or 4... I've been

Hi All, I attempted to switch my MP3 server from Icecast 1 to Icecast 2 today. I run a Live365 station, Big Planet Radio, which simply relays my local Icecast server. My Icecast 2 error.log file shows a lot of the following messages when the Live365 server, Nanocaster 2.5.6, is connected to it: [2003-05-14 22:09:15] DBUG format-mp3/format_mp3_write_buf_to_client Client had recoverable error

Hi All, I attempted to switch my MP3 server from Icecast 1 to Icecast 2 today. I run a Live365 station, Big Planet Radio, which simply relays my local Icecast server. My Icecast 2 error.log file shows a lot of the following messages when the Live365 server, Nanocaster 2.5.6, is connected to it: [2003-05-14 22:09:15] DBUG format-mp3/format_mp3_write_buf_to_client Client had recoverable error

> RackSpace wants $7,400/month for 3TB (3,000GB) of monthly traffic. > That's a major expense for a community radio station. Can anyone > suggest a less expensive way to connect? That sounds like a bad deal, or else my math is wrong. That comes out to 9Mbps per second here. Math: 3000GB * 8 bits/byte divided by 86400 sec/day * 30 days At one time (maybe bandwidth prices have

Another, but more recent problem, I am having is Live365. I haven't done much work with it, but can you relay to Live365 properly? They give me an ip and it works, but I don't show up in their listings, and the song title doesn't show up in the client's mp3player. (whereas if someone listens to the local broadcast they do get the song titles). Using latest, from CVS, Icecast

If anyone else is using Live365 and having problems getting their streams to show up.. I found out something interesting today. I've been emailing back and forth asking them why I can listen to my mirror just fine on their service if I use the javascript I ripped out of their site and put into mine to open up their little mini-window, but when I do a search for the station it doesn't

I need a "complete" list of "reliable" services for repeating the signal of a station to the listeners (live radio). The situation is that a station will be doing live radio and has a little DSL connection and external bandwith will be required. I don't mind if it costs much or it is cheap, I now just want to join information to say my customer: You have all this coices,

The main stream is going to a Shoutcast server via Winamp. Works fine. A Relay stream goes to Live365. Works fine. I set up a Relay under SAM to point to the Icecast server running on another box on the network. In SAMs Realy section it tells me that it's connected - and Icecast seems to be telling me the same thing. Obviously I'm missing something in the setup of IceCast - I think?

--- Akos Maroy <darkeye@tyrell.hu> wrote: > did you try it with darkice configured for shoutcast? e.g. a > configuration section [shoutcast-0]? Yes I did, but it never connected properly. This is the message: DarkIce 0.8 live audio streamer, http://darkice.sourceforge.net Copyright (c) 2000-2002, Tyrell Hungary, http://tyrell.hu Using config file: /usr/local/etc/live365.cfg Using

I just tried my first production icecast 2 streaming. When I try and connect ogg123 to the stream, I get the following: $ ogg123 -v http://yp.tilos.hu:9000/tilos96 HTTP Headers: ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ and then the last line unlimited number of times. What could be wrong? (The above URL will be active until midnight CET for anyone to try

this is probably caused by the lack of buffering in icecast2. Their relay client may be doing some buffering in itself, and if it's expecting for there to be buffering on the server side as well, it might exhibit a behavior you are seeing....(that also is a difference between iceast1 and icecast2 - no server-side buffering in icecast2 and there was in icecast1)... fwiw, I am trying to

> behavior you are seeing....(that also is a difference between iceast1 and > icecast2 - no server-side buffering in icecast2 and there was in > icecast1)... What do you mean stream buffering? We never buffered in either version that I remember. If you fall behind, you get kicked. It's always been that way. jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/

> I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm not charging anything. As > mentioned, the royalties to record labels still stand if you don't follow > the rules, but this will be true regardless of the format > (mp3/vorbis/whatever.) Do you have any ads on your site? That's probably streaming related revenue. Do you list on shoutcast.com? There's definately

k' then. now our problem... We have (in the netherlands) a site which has the top 100 singles in Real. We have the copy bit on, still Warner wants us to only stream 30 seconds of each song. Even worse, our on demand 'radio station', which has thousands of songs on request is threatened too. Any idea how we stand? Maarten ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Moffitt"

> performances. That's ~125,000 performances a year, which equates to about > $180,000. > > Significantly higher than the Frauhofer license, unless you generate > $9Mil/yr or more in revenue from your stream. The rates are in arbitration, and I doubt they will come out anywhere near that amount. It just isn't feasible, even for large companies. Reember, tradidional

Gary Major wrote: > Does darkice or anything else allow you take the incoming audio from a > soundcard, but instead of encoding it and sending it to icecast, just encode > it and save it as a file instead? DarkIce not at the moment, though as of 0.8 you can save all what is sent to the server in a local file. <p>Akos <p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives: