Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "ogg bitrate scaling"
2004 Aug 06
3
Multiple bitrate from the same source ?
Hi,
I'd like to broadcast the same source at multiple bitrate. Is it
possible ? Have you got some clues ?
Regards,
Pascal
<p><p><p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe'
2005 May 20
2
Experimental Bitrate peeler
Hi All,
As specified in earlier email we have released the trial version of the ogg vorbis decoder. Along with the decoder we have released an experimental version of the bitrate peeler that we have used to test the decoder for bitrate peeled inputs. We have made the executable of the bitrate peeler available from our website downloads section.
www.vinjey.com/ogg_downloads.html
2003 Dec 29
1
Bitrate stripping?
Hey y'all --
I heard some discussion a while back about "bitrate stripping" to reduce
filesize without re-encoding ... has this gone anywhere?
Too lazy to write a re-encode script,
Nate
<p>
---
nate - nmt2002@columbia.edu
cell=917 445 6830 aim=mediumnate
abolishthe.us/gpgpublickey
Nobody for president.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg
2004 Aug 06
1
Multiple bitrate from the same source ?
On Fri, 31 May 2002 christophe.guerin@etud.univ-pau.fr wrote:
> --->ices (prerecorded MP3)
> You must run ices with reencoding, and run second ices with a different bitrate,
> run a third ices with another birate....
Can't you do it all from the one instance? I'm pretty sure I've seen it
done.
Geoff.
<p><p>
--
Geoff Shang <gshang@uq.net.au>
ICQ
2004 Sep 28
2
Bitrate Peeling (no. really)
Hey,
Maybe you guys remember us, I'm from the Neuros forums. I've got to say,
having a player that supports Ogg Vorbis has really turned things around
for everybody. We're still struggling with higher bitrate Vorbis
streams, but that is only because of our terribly underpowered DSP.
Anyway, to the point of my email.
Recently the discussion of bitrate peeling has been floating
2004 Aug 06
1
Displaying song titles
> OK, I'm a clueless newbie...I'm using icecast on a
> colocated server as a mirror to my shoutcast
> server. Everything works ok, but the only info
> shown in winamp is the stream title (station ID)
> when connecting to the mirror. The shoutcast server
> displays song info as it should, but the mirror is
> not parsing it. How do I set things up to display
>
2005 Oct 21
2
Ogg Vorbis bitrate peeling bounty on Launchpad
Hello all,
Just a quick note to let you all know that I have placed a bounty on
Lauchpad to get bitrate peeling added to Vorbis. It is a feature that I
think we would all like to have, and would probably pay something to
get, but it hasn't been done.
My request to you is to add to the bounty. I have seeded it with US$20,
which is not enough to motivate a developer to get it done, but I am a
2003 Apr 08
6
bitpeeler
No offense, Segher, but the output quality of this thing is awful. =)
I'll disregard the fact that, at least with *my* compiler, the source
tarball I downloaded reduces every packet to zero bytes, which isn't
terribly interesting.
I decided to set the byte reduction to something constant: I started
by dividing each packet's size by 2 just to see what would happen.
The resulting ogg
2002 Dec 21
4
had a thought on peeling last night
I was up late last night, and i had a thought on peeling that would probably provide 100% accurate peeling data to a decoder, but take a maximum of 1101 times normal time to encode (taking into account the range from q-1 to q10 ).
ay you want to encode a track at q10, but you want it to be peelable.
the 1101 encoder would encode from the source at every quantifiable level (since there are 2
2004 Aug 06
8
disappointed with group
Hi all,
must say I have found the help in this group very disapointing. Have
mail numerous times for help with some (in hindsight) simple problems.
yet no one (ok 1 person) has attempted to aid me.
If this group was ONLY filled with novices and users I could accept this
but I have seen members of the development team , and others who have
insight into the workings of icecast comment on other
2004 Aug 06
0
ogg bitrate scaling
At 09:56 PM 5/28/02 +1000, you wrote:
>
>I'm trying to get a bitrate scaled live ogg stream working,
>but I've not found out how to get this running with the
>current tools. I've downloaded the CVS icecast2, and darkice,
>but the only option seems to be if the same stream is actually
>encoded multiple times at different bitrates. This is not
>good for my cpu.
2004 Aug 06
2
Icecast2 documentation
I try to run the Icecast2 server, but when i start:
icecast -c icecast.xml
the server print the xml file and stop immediately..
Is a documentation exist?
--
CHRISTOPHE GUERIN
(christophe.guerin@etud.univ-pau.fr)
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
2004 Aug 06
2
Problem with Ices and Icecast2
Thanks a lot for your help...
If you need Ices2 for streaming ogg with Icecast, which is the utility of
Ogg-Vorbis support of ices1 ?
<p>
--
CHRISTOPHE GUERIN
(christophe.guerin@etud.univ-pau.fr)
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org'
2002 Jun 23
1
peeling as I understand it (was Re: When will quality increase be unnoticable?)
>> Is bit-peeling going to be real (or just a rumor forever)?
> Apparently the RC3 streams are capable of being bit peeled, however the
> tool to do so was looking likely to be quite complex. I believe the plan
> was to have RC4 produce streams that left better hints for the peeling
> tool, so as to make the tool simpler and faster, but I doubt we'll see it
> until
2002 Jul 11
1
RC4/1.0 and peeling
first, congrats to monty and the whole crew for getting
this close to 1.0. it's a monumental achievement reflecting
a huge amount of hard work -- kudos!
econd, i know the bitrate peeling feature has been pushed
back until after 1.0 is out. but i'm wondering -- will oggs
created with a 1.0 encoder be peelable with an as-yet-unreleased
utility, or do "peelable oggs" have to be
2004 Aug 06
2
Displaying song titles
OK, I'm a clueless newbie...I'm using icecast on a
colocated server as a mirror to my shoutcast
server. Everything works ok, but the only info
shown in winamp is the stream title (station ID)
when connecting to the mirror. The shoutcast server
displays song info as it should, but the mirror is
not parsing it. How do I set things up to display
currently playing song and artist and
2005 May 20
1
Ogg vorbis decoder - Independent implementation questions
Hi All,
Ours is an embedded software solutions company that focuses on developing embedded software solutions specific to the DSP market. I'm happy to inform the ogg vorbis developer community that today we have release trial version of our Ogg vorbis decoder made available on PC, TMS320C67x platform (More platforms to follow). More information about the same can be fetched from
2003 Jun 22
2
Bit Rate Peeling Quality
Hi All,
Let me ask this question of the group: When bit rate peeling becomes
available, how will the quality of the peeled Vorbis file compare to a
file encoded at the target quality directly from the original?
So, for:
a.wav --> b.ogg (at q6) --> c.ogg (at q2)
a.wav --------------------> d.ogg (at q2)
how are c.ogg and d.ogg likely to compare in terms of audio
2004 Jan 02
1
A bitrate peeling attempt
Given all this talk of peeling lately, I thought I'd try out a method
I've been thinking about for a while now. It goes something like this:
* Peeling is achieved by dropping some of the residue.
* The encoder indicates how much of the residue to retain (e.g a number
of stages, 3 bits in the stream per packet, non-standard!).
* The decoder (peeler) copies the contents of packets except
2003 Mar 31
5
Rhubarber (advanced peeler)
Hi all,
[For the uninitiated: a "peeler" is a program that transforms
a Vorbis stream into a smaller, (somewhat) lower quality Vorbis
stream, and does so quickly, by just throwing out some data.]
After having prototyped several peelers that aim to peel
to a certain filesize, or to a certain quality, with mixed
success, I've now taken a different route: a peeler that
aims for the