similar to: stupid headers

With Winamp, you need to set the port to one number below the server port. ie: if the server is on 8000, set Winamp to 7999. When used with a Shoutcast server, Winamp uses the base port for metadata, & port+1 for the audio stream & headers. You also need to have the Icecast server listen on both ports (or run a second 'dummy' server on port-1) so that Winamp will at least *think*

Hello, using flac 1.1.2 regularly failed recently to encode a specific set of WAV files I got from the Internet. Listen to these files with XMMS, Audacious works fine. See the following output: options: -P 4096 -b 4608 -m -l 8 -q 0 -r 3,3 Track01.wav: WARNING: found non-standard 'fmt ' sub-chunk which has length = 30 Track01.wav: ERROR: unsupported compression type 85 What could I do to

Sorry, to interrupt the license flame war... I downloaded the source from CVS as of 11am this morning and there are a couple of issues that I ran into: 1) I built the package and then in the examples dir I executed the following commands: # cdparanoia -B 1-1 # ./encoder-example < track01.cdda.wav > test.vor # ./decoder-example < test.vor > out.wav The rip and the encode both work

oggenc -b 128 -d 1985 -N 01 -t "Black Planet" -l "First and Last and Always" -a "Sisters of Mercy" track01.cdda.wav egs in free in simple_utf8_encode. I tracked it down to a mis-calculated buffer size for malloc. I've attached the patch that fixes it (for me:). The only problem I have with the rest of the code is figuring out how the terminating 0 (null,

Hello all: I have a data series of 500 data, and I want to limit the value of it to be less than 1. Below is my code: >for (i in 1:500) +if( x[i] > 1) +x[i] = 1 but the system told me it's wrong. Can anyone told me the reason? ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Saji Ren from Shanghai China GoldenHeart Investment Group

I setup icecast on my O-bsd server recently and whenever I try to connect with a shoutcast DSP (winamp/m$) I get the error on my server: "Kicking unknown 1 [cust8950.lava.net] [Stupid headers], connected for 0 seconds" I have had it working on freebsd, and even used my working confif file. the only difference is when there is no password supplied I get a "no encoder" error

Actually, it was a coincidence that it was between songs... after trying again, my Winamp list the stream, and I looked in the icecast.log file and saw this: [03/May/2001:19:34:43] [8:Source Thread] Kicking client 11 [192.168.1.4] [Too ma ny errors (client not receiving data fast enough)] [listener], connected for 2 m inutes and 9 seconds, 1866136 bytes transfered. 0 clients connected Is this

I have done some tests on the problem I keep having (as well as others) on the connection problem. Here's the message I get when i tail the logfile on the console at debug level 3 : -> [28/Feb/2001:11:58:54] Kicking client 13 [192.168.1.21] [Too many errors (client not receiving data fast enough)] [listener], connected for 21 minutes, 19906336 bytes transfered. 0 clients connected

Howdy, Flac-1.1.4 is refusing to encode some WAV files (amd64, gentoo): % flac Song\ Name-Track01.wav Song Name-Track01.wav: WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format type 1 but bits-per-sample=24 Song Name-Track01.wav: 100% complete, ratio=0.546Song Name-Track01.wav: ERROR during read of data pad byte % sfinfo Song\ Name-Track01.wav File Name Song Name-Track01.wav File Format Microsoft RIFF

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Sameer Sahasrabuddhe < sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com> wrote: > Ping! We need to close on whether everyone is convinced that symbolic > memory scopes have a significant advantage over opaque numbers. Either of > them will be examined by optimizations using a target-implemented API. I > personally don't think that readability in the LLVM

Hey guys Is it possible to record with mixmonitor straight into mp3. I am trying to reduce disk space and want my calls to be recorded in mp3 Instead of wav. Sent from Samsung Mobile <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Sameer Rathod <sameer at hostnsoft.com> </div><div>Date:30/06/2014 9:23 PM (GMT+02:00) </div><div>To:

Hi, I am getting *Can't provide secure audio requested in SDP offer* with sipml5 client hosted on my local system [1060] ; This will be WebRTC client type=friend username=1060 ; The Auth user for SIP.js host=dynamic ; Allows any host to register secret=sameer ; The SIP Password for SIP.js encryption=yes ; Tell Asterisk to use encryption for this peer avpf=yes ; Tell Asterisk to use AVPF

> On Aug 17, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Zhuravlyov, Konstantin <Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com> wrote: > > >Why not going with a metadata attachment directly and kill the "singlethread" keyword? Something like: > >Something like: > > cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 0 monotonic monotonic, 3, !memory.scope{!42} > > cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 0 monotonic

Hi, I have updated the review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723 As Sameer pointed out, the motivation is: In OpenCL 2.x, two atomic operations on the same atomic object need to have the same scope to prevent a data race. This derives from the definition of "inclusive scope" in OpenCL 2.x. Encoding OpenCL 2.x scope as metadata in LLVM IR would be a problem because there cannot be a

At 23:25 3/15/2001 -0500, you wrote: >Asym, > >What streaming program are you using? I'm using icecast 1.3.10 with meta >data turned on and it doesn't want to list on yp.shoutcast.com. Can you >e-mail me your icecast.conf and your streaming config file via e-mail? >Thanks... I'm running icecast 1.3.10 on FreeBSD 3.5-Stable, and my source is Winamp 2.72 w/

On 1/9/2015 4:14 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Sahasrabuddhe, Sameer > <sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com <mailto:sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com>> > wrote: > > Here's what this looks like to me: > > 1. LLVM text format will use string symbols for memory scopes, > and not numbers. The set of strings is target

Hi Preston, I was wondering ... "Bottom" is a bit overloaded as far as terms go. Would SCEVNaN be a better name for this beast? Sameer. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of Sameer Sahasrabuddhe > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:16 AM > To: preston.briggs at gmail.com > Cc: LLVM

>Why not use OggDrop? Going for managed bitrates? Tagging? > If you really must know (and I don't think it matters) I use oggdrop because I want to > encode a batch of files without requiring user intervention between each file, and because I do lot of tagging. > Besides, I don't see how oggdrop is going to HELP me encode the entire CD to Ogg Vorbis. It's

Hello all, I'm glad to announce to you that Vorbis now has full ReplayGain support. If you're not familiar with ReplayGain, take a look at www.replaygain.org. The main features are: a) all songs play back with equal loudness b) removes the need for normalization c) allows for clipping prevention Using it is very simple. Get a compatible decoder (ogg123, XMMS and WinAmp all support it

I've not had a good chance to look at the patches in detail, but just to clarify one point: I don't really care whether we number things going up or down from single threaded to "every thread". I just think it makes sense to expose them in the in-memory IR interface as an enum with a particular ordering so that code can use the obvious sorts of tests for comparing two orderings