similar to: vorbis quality - quality scale vs bitrate

On 27.11.2017 02:00, YIRAN LI wrote: > I'm using libvorbis in my program and need to encode to target bitrate. I > know libvorbis prefer to use quality scale but I can't use it. > > I've found something at faq http://vorbis.com/faq/#quality > > *For now, quality 0 is roughly equivalent to 64kbps average, 5 is roughly > 160kbps, and 10 gives about 400kbps. Most

I would like to see the following information added to the FAQ at vorbis.com, appended to the "Audio Quality" section. "Uiver," "boa," and "jonI" from OPN's #Vorbis channel contributed and reviewed it. "What does the 'quality' setting mean?" Beginning with vorbislib 1.0-rc3, audio quality is no longer measured in kilobits per

Hullo, folks. As the wiki is *still* down, I'm sending this to the list again. The EZAV EMP-400 is a small flash-based portable player with an OLED screen. I think it's still in development, because I can't find information on its pricing anywhere. The memory capacity isn't visible anywhere either, but the previous device from EZAV had 256 megs of memory.

I have /bin/ash from rh8 installation and I have following error when I tried to change using ash instead of sh with shorewall-1.4.7: + eval options=$tap0_options + options= + list_search newnotsyn + local e=newnotsyn + [ 1 -gt 1 ] + return 1 + run_user_exit newnotsyn + find_file newnotsyn + [ -n -a -f /newnotsyn ] + echo /etc/shorewall/newnotsyn + local user_exit=/etc/shorewall/newnotsyn + [

The first Beta Version is available at: http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta New features include: 1) "shorewall refresh" now reloads the traffic shaping rules (tcrules and tcstart). 2) "shorewall debug [re]start" now turns off debugging after an error occurs. This places the point of the failure near the end of the

the Vorbis FAQ says: "mid to high quality (8kHz-48.0kHz, 16+ bit, polyphonic) audio and music at fixed and variable bitrates from 16 to 128 kbps/channel." What is the difference between Hz and bitrate? Doesn't MP3 support higher bitrates? Pointers for more reading are welcome.

I just added 802.1Q VLAN support to redhat initscripts. And after support was ready, I tried to restart shorewall. Well it blew into pieces. Seems like shorewall can''t handle device names like: eth0.3 very properly. That''s default naming of vlan devices. eth1 is master device and 3 is id of my test vlan. So when I added to interfaces line: home eth0.3 detect seems like

Tuomo Soini wrote: > You don''t happen to read shorewall-devel mailinglist ? I read it -- I just didn''t know what to make of your post and it arrived while I was on vacation. What exactly are you trying to accomplish that Shorewall isn''t doing for you now? e.g. /etc/shorewall/zones rw Roadwarriors Road Warriors /etc/shorewall/interfraces rw ipsec+

christophe.guerin@etud.univ-pau.fr wrote: > > * Enough bandwidth to run the server. If you want to broadcast to 100 > listeners at 24kbps, you'll need about 24kbps*100 = 2,400kbps = 2.4Mbps > of bandwidth. That's about 2 T1 lines worth of bandwidth. Trying to > push 100 128kbps listeners down your 768kbps cable modem isn't going > to work :) It

It seems to me that ipsecnat tunnel type is not complete. Latest drafts of ipsec nat-traversal use udp port 4500 for nat-traversal communications. (It''s called port floating). That is needed to get rid of ugly ipsec passthru devices. Now ipsecnat opens port udp/500 from any source port. And I think ipsecnat won''t work at all with gw zone defined? I''m not sure about

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I''m running systems with openswan and modified _updown script supporting shorewall dynamic hosts. Because on problems with cvs head version of openswan I found a error from shorewall dynamic hosts support. When host is already in zone shorewall aborts adding process with error. This is not good thing(tm). I found out that deleting host from

Hi folks, I''m conducting a straw poll for your opinions on whether we should send CVS commit logs (probably with diffs) to the shorewall-devel list, or to another (new) list? I can see advantages to both ways: separate lists mean that people who aren''t contributing code don''t get flooded with code noise, but a single list will help keep everyone involved in the

Hello, I’ve a question. I have a station now with Shoutcast and shoutcast transcoder for 2 bitrates. 192kbps mp3 and 64 kbps aac+. I want to transfer these to Icecast. I’ve an working icecast server but i need an auto dj that can encode 2 bitrates, 192kbps mp3 and 64kbps aac. I had a working setup, but my nonstop machine is not on the icecast server but externally. Now in shoutcast transcoder i

Although 1.4 is now released, there is one aspect of Shorewall''s design that I''m still quite unhappy with. It involves two areas: a) when and when not to create rules to allow inbound traffic on an interface to be routed back out that same interface. b) intrazone traffic. I''m currently running 1.4.0 plus a change that: a) Allows intrazone traffic unconditionally --

Hi friends, I'm build libtheora on MingW W64 and want to get rid of the dependency on libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll. I tried to use LDFLAGS=-static-libgcc but seems it doesn't work. Someone told me I should use -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++, but I don't know how to set it. Should I use ./configure LDFLAGS="-static-libgcc -static-libstdc++" or ./configure LDFLAGS=-static-libgcc

All, I have been using Shorewall successfully for years on many different machines and configurations. However, I just built a new box and wanted to setup shorewall on it. I''m running SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 and Shorewall 4.4.8 (latest version as of this e-mail) using the RPM download. I am able to install Shorewall just fine and I''m able to setup everything except

shorewall-docs-html-1.4.10a is missing following files: Banner.htm Shorewall_index_frame.htm seattle_firewall_index.htm Or there should be different index.htm in tar. There might be other missing files but that''s what I found out immidiately when I tried to check local docs. -- Tuomo Soini <tis@foobar.fi> Linux and network services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy

Hi, does anyone have any idea whether VIA VT6102 "Rhine II" and Realtek RTL 8100 Ethernet chips are supported by FreeBSD? The hardware list for supported chips does list 'VT86C100A "Rhine II"' but according to VIA website VT86C100A is actually just "Rhine" and it is obviously not the same chip. (The 'VT3043 "Rhine I"' chip mentioned in

Hi I want to encode at 64kbps at a 22050 rate ... this is not possible ... why? For me it seems a waste of cpu to encode at 64kbps with 44100 sample rate (of course I might be wrong :). I saw in the vorbisenc.c that aprox_bitrate_to_vbr returns -1 to every sample rate that is not > 42000 ... is this safe to change ? Thanks, Nicu. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: