similar to: NHW Codec - some spec?

Hello, I don't have advanced (and worked) on the NHW codec recently.I however compiled the codec with gcc -O3 setting (the binaries are available from my demo page: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com ) and just with this optimization (no mmx, sse, avx instructions,... ) the NHW codec is 6x faster to encode and 4x faster to decode than WebP.As I state that my codec is royalty-free, fast with more

You're welcome! On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 4:50 AM Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Dave, > > Thank you very much for your help! > > Cheers, > Raphael > > 2018-07-10 9:39 GMT+02:00 Dave Johnson Games <davefilms.us at gmail.com>: > >> Let me do some looking. >> >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 4:55 PM Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at

Hello, So here is the compression scheme that I don't know if is covered by patent. I use it on the wavelet DC parts.It outputs 1 byte (8 bits) words.There is 5 modes: - 1(MSB) | 7 bits to store value (0->127 range) - 01 | 6 bits to store val[n+1]-val[n] | val[n]-val[n-1] if each in the range [-4,4] - 001 | 5 bits to store val[n+2]-val[n+1] | val[n+1]-val[n] | val[n]-val[n-1] if each in

Hello Dave, Thank you very much for your help! Cheers, Raphael 2018-07-10 9:39 GMT+02:00 Dave Johnson Games <davefilms.us at gmail.com>: > Let me do some looking. > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 4:55 PM Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello Dave! >> >> Thank you very much for your answer! >> >> You're right.I have thought

Hello, Ok, and that's too many work to review a source code.In my codec, I have 3 compression schemes, I think 2 are not patented, but the third... I don't know.For the rest, I think my codec is patent-free (I don't use SPIHT,EZW,zerotree methods), even the wavelet transform is new and don't use the lifting scheme nor the convolution product. Else, if you found time to review the

Hello, Yes, that's right.I still think that it would have more weight if I could claim that Xiph has reviewed the source code and find that the NHW codec is royalty/patent-free (better than me alone claiming this...).Maybe it was in this sense that Ralph Giles answered me? Cheers, Raphael 2015-01-15 18:02 GMT+01:00 Jason Self <jason at bluehome.net>: > Raphael Canut asked: >

Hello, I don't have advanced on the NHW Project this past month, but I have definitely validated its characteristics and this new version. The NHW Codec preserves or enhances image neatness and sharpness, which translates that on good quality images the NHW Codec is globally better than HEVC, and on degraded (with blur, artifacts) images it is worse than HEVC because it lacks of precision. I

I think Apple is somehow "attached" to the MPEG group. They control the "pools" too. Your codec sounds great. Google could -- if they wanted to -- use it but they have Web^M and webP. Look to Asia. Asus has just launched a new phone. ?? On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 3:14 PM Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I don't have advanced on the NHW

Hello, Just a quick message to let you know that I get back to NHW Project currently. I downloaded 20 images from the Internet with rather good quality (mainly faces), I compressed them at high compression -l7 setting with the NHW Project, and on 19 images out of 20, I visually prefer the results of NHW compared to x265 (HEVC)!!! -I can make available these 20x3=60 512x512 24bit bitmap images

Hello, Just a quick message to let you know that I have really improved very high compression of the NHW Project from -l8 to -l13 quality settings, and we can still save 2.5KB per .nhw compressed file. Actually I am new to very high compression, it is just 3 months that I am working on it (I put on pause the NHW Project from August 2013 to February 2018 )... And I realize that very high

Hi Andrey, Thank you for your answer.Actually, NHW is very low-power so I think it could be geared toward any hardware.But actually I don't have hardware skills, so NHW is not a real hardware project for now maybe? I agree with you that it is extremely difficult (for me) to build a community around NHW, I'm certainly very bad/underskilled at it.Any help is welcome! Cheers, Raphael Le

Raphael, Some 15 years ago I implemented limited functionality Theora in our cameras FPGA (it took me 6 month of hard labor), and then gave up - it is a very crowded space and it is difficult to compete with more advanced codecs. And for our other work we anyway need almost raw image data, so we are using JPEG-based JP4 format (https://community.elphel.com/jp4) that we originally developed for

Raphael, I do not believe it is possible to build a viable community around most hardware projects except super-universal based on very cheap/high-volume products like Pi or Arduino. We see the commercial benefits of Free Software/Open Hardware as it adds value to the hardware as users are ready to pay extra for the Freedom. Andrey ---- On Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:59:34 -0700 Raphael Canut

Hello, I forgot in my last reply that my DWT implementation can be speed up, for example I'm doing for now: for (;_X1<_E_;_X1++,_RES+=2) //dilatation { _RES[0]=_X1[0]<<3; _RES[1]=(_X1[1]+_X1[0])<<2; } then for (;_X2<_E_;_X2++,_RES+=2) //details { _RES[0]-=(_X2[1]+_X2[0])<<1; _RES[1]+=6*_X2[1]-_X2[2]-_X2[0];

On 01/15/2015 12:39 PM, Raphael Canut wrote: > Hello, > > Yes, that's right.I still think that it would have more weight if I > could claim that Xiph has reviewed the source code and find that the NHW > codec is royalty/patent-free (better than me alone claiming > this...).Maybe it was in this sense that Ralph Giles answered me? > > Cheers, > Raphael That's

Hello, Very sorry I made a mistake, I compared this version with an old one, not with the previous one, and in fact results are the same, there is no improvement actually... Else I would like to have your opinion on how to have more visibility, audience for the NHW Project.I suspect that big companies don't even know that the NHW Project exists or they didn't test it because it seems too

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com> Date: 2017-11-30 14:22 GMT+01:00 Subject: Re: [theora] NHW Project - speed comparison with x265 To: fboehm <fboehm at aon.at> Hi Franz, Many thanks for your answer!!! > I appreciate your enthusiastic work on such a complex project like writing a video codec Yes, for now the NHW codec is more an

Hello, I don't have advanced on the NHW codec, but now, as a lot of people, I am following the AOMedia AV1 codec.Just a (late) update of my previous post, there won't be problem in AOM AV1 with the CABAC scheme, as the codec will use Daala's multi-symbol entropy coder and/or ANS.That's great! I have even read on the wiki page, that AV1 will use Daala's PVQ as quantization

Thank you so much Sir!!! If you have time, do not hesitate to let us know what you would think of the NHW Project.Any remark, opinion would be very welcome! Many thanks again! Best regards, Raphael 2018-04-28 23:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Johnson Games <davefilms.us at gmail.com>: > Cool, I'll check it out. > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 3:09 PM Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com>

Hello, I know there is no community around NHW, but I would have liked to know what you would like to see improved in the NHW codec.I know its results are not perfect for now compared to high-end AV1/VVC codecs for example, but could be ok giving its extremely fast speed.-However on high quality images, I notably like its good results because of its neatness.- Regarding things to improve, there