similar to: Metadata block requirements

I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2 4800+ with 2GIG ram. Just curious if I can reduce any more time out of my compiles. Jerry

Hollo I'm new, My name is Ariel Arelovich I've encountered the following problem trying to sue metaflac. I used the following command: c:\Archivos de programa\FLAC>metaflac --set-tag-from-file="CUESHEET=sola.cue" so la.flac sola.flac: ERROR: file 'sola.cue' for 'CUESHEET' tag value has embedded NULs And I've got that error. See I have the flac that is

hello guys, i am using acts_as_ferret plugin(0.4.1 Latest) with ferret gem(0.11.4 Latest) on rails 1.2.5 and ruby 1.8.6(UBUNTU Gutsy) i have this :Stores Model acts_as_ferret :fields => {:name => { :boost => 2 ,:store => :yes}, :short_desc => { :boost => 1.5,:store => :yes }, :tag_list => {:boost => 1

Hello, I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed recently with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and was wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog) is that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags. I'm curious because I have been using ID3 tags with FLAC (I store extra data such as album art with my media files,

Hi All; Which is better (to have more stable or release versions) of zaptel, libpri and asterisk: to use cvs or svn? In case of using cvs, why I need to type: export CVSROOT=:pserver:anoncvs:anoncvs at cvs.digium.com:/usr/cvsroot In other words: what is the use of pserver, anoncvs, ... with cvs checkout? Note: How can I know all the variables needed for cvs checkout so I might need to do

Hi, I've successfully compiled flac-1.1.2 to transcode flac to wav with twonkyvision running on a DNS-323 which has a ARM-processor. The problem is that from time to time something hangs. Therefore I have tried to compile the newest flac, flac-1.2.1, and it compiles with no problems but when running it, for example "flac -t test.flac", it only echos "Illegal

I have some FLACs that have STREAMINFO that looks like this: METADATA block #0 type: 0 (STREAMINFO) is last: false length: 34 minumum blocksize: 4608 samples maximum blocksize: 4608 samples minimum framesize: 0 bytes maximum framesize: 0 bytes sample_rate: 44100 Hz channels: 2 bits-per-sample: 16 total samples: 0 MD5 signature: 00000000000000000000000000000000 (This came

On 2006-03-09 (Thu) ,at 23:20:50 Josh Coalson wrote: > the vorbiscomments are not in the streaminfo. you want to do: > > FLAC::Metadata::VorbisComment tags; > if (FLAC::Metadata::get_tags("somefile.flac", tags)) { > FLAC::Metadata::VorbisComment::Entry entry = > tags->get_comment(tags->get_num_comments-1); //e.g. last tag > // do something with

> ID3 support was only dropped in the plugins. libFLAC still can > decode FLAC files that have ID3 tags (v1 or v2). it just ignores > them and there are no plans to change that in the future. OK, that's what I thought, but wanted to be sure. I've been updating some metadata handling routines in our application and heard something about this and was curious. > the spec

Thanks for the quick response on the C++ thing. It would also be nice if the host program could correctly write the STREAMINFO block in the stream encoder metadata callback without having to know the specifics of the header format (or worry about endianness). How exactly to achieve this might take some thought, but what about this idea: 1. The correct way to respond to the metadata callback:

It's certainly best to honor what the specification says. My assumption is that a "stream" could also be a continuous broadcast, not just a file. With a hypothetical server streaming FLAC bitstreams, I would assume that the most recent STREAMINFO is valid until another one comes along. If you're writing a file player, then perhaps you can trust the spec and assume

Hello, I have a problem and haven't been able to figure it out yet. I was running a test of an upload mechanism the product my company makes uses. The idea is that users can upload files to a share, and we process/archive those files when they have been added. It would try to detect if a file is in use, and if that were so, it would skip that particular file and come back to it

Hello, I'm currently doing a little music player using libflac and libao. What I've currently done works as it should, but I have a problem where only one metadata block is detected, even if there are more (it doesn't have the last attribute set to true). This is using flac 1.3.2 on Gentoo amd64. The main code file is attached, it mainly follows the examples given with the libflac

I'm writing a program that plays FLAC files using the libFLAC API's. Is there a specific way I'm supposed to handle multiple STREAMINFO metadata blocks? For example, should I ignore all but the first, or all but the last? The format spec doesn't mention anything. Thanks, - Brian Waters

Op wo 16 okt 2024 om 16:25 schreef Stefan Oltmanns <stefan-oltmanns at gmx.net>: > > Yes, overwriting the streaminfo total_samples number is a bit of a hack, > but it would only affect those files with more than 2^36 samples that > contains the special seek point, so no difference for the average flac user. > > Not sure how the applications actually read flac files, if they

Using Trader's Little Helper 2.4.1.160 when testing some 16/96 FLAC files I run into the following error: "file is decodable without error, but flac fingerprint cannot be checked since it was unset in the streaminfo block." Is there an automatic checksum verification when testing/decoding? Is there any way to fix this, i.e. get rid of the error? Martin

Hi, I would like to clear something up about Sample Rate, If the Frame header can look to the metadata block streaminfo for sample rate what (if anything limits it to 655350Hz)? Can all frame headers not just point to streaminfo and it be specified in streaminfo as all 1s ie 2^20-1 = 1,048,575Hz? It would be really good to be able to use 1MHz and beyond for some of my/our work. Does anything

Am 16.10.24 um 15:15 schrieb Martijn van Beurden: > > But how should such a number be presented to the libFLAC user? You > suggested overwriting the streaminfo total_samples number, but > streaminfo always precedes the seektable, so the streaminfo metadata > block is already parsed by the application before the seektable is > even read. Also, I think it is quite hacky to not pass

On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 11:04, Josh Coalson wrote: > could you clarify your plan... are you thinking about > 1) encoding to a FLAC container and using metadata blocks > for everything that is not data? > 2) writing your own container? > > 1) seems kind of impractical to do in a general way. > I'm starting to also think that 2) is the best route. I was originally

Op di 15 okt 2024 om 21:27 schreef Alistair Buxton <a.j.buxton at gmail.com>: > > I would like to see this kind of thing put into a secondary metadata block aimed specifically at SDR. This could be completely ignored by regular audio players - these files are not meant to be listened to anyway. I could probably figure out how to implement that, I even started looking into it once, but