similar to: Bug: flac --replay-gain thinks that I used --no-padding

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Scott F <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > > If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain > > option, I get a warning about the --no-padding > > option... > > > > "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with > > --no-padding" > > > > ...even though I'm

While I'm playing around with it, I'd like to ask about something I've noticed. Sometimes when I use metaflac to add tags, it performs it's operation instantly in a split second. Other times the same command causes lot of HDD I/O's and I can see it create a "filename.flac.metadata_edit" temp file. For example - I just added tags to a 25MB file and it took 15 seconds

Pleas learn how to snip uneeded text from your posts. Version 1.2.0 is a stable release, which had some earlier beta revisions. I'd say it was quite well tested. Furthermore, there's no upgrade risk, as the API is still compatible. FLAC is backwards and forwards compatible. -Ivo

Josh, I applied this patch and all the "make check" tests passed (but I do not have valgrind and I did not use --enable-exhaustive-tests during configure, so it isn't all the tests). Do you see anything suspicious about it? --- flac-1.1.2.oldBuild/src/flac/decode.c 2005-01-24 20:13:46.000000000 -0800 +++ flac-1.1.2/src/flac/decode.c 2006-09-06 23:36:26.000000000 -0700

Fix for padding with --replay-gain option. Ported from flac 1.2.1 maintenance branch: http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/flac/encode.c?r1=1.194&r2=1.194.2.1&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/flac/main.c?r1=1.169&r2=1.169.2.1&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH -------------- next part

lvqcl wrote: > Fix for padding with --replay-gain option. Ported from flac 1.2.1 > maintenance branch: > > http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/flac/encode.c?r1=1.194&r2=1.194.2.1&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH > >

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > All 9 patchsets applied, tested and pushed. Thanks! Great, thanks. (Un)fortunately, I have yet more patches...

Howdy, Flac-1.1.4 is refusing to encode some WAV files (amd64, gentoo): % flac Song\ Name-Track01.wav Song Name-Track01.wav: WARNING: legacy WAVE file has format type 1 but bits-per-sample=24 Song Name-Track01.wav: 100% complete, ratio=0.546Song Name-Track01.wav: ERROR during read of data pad byte % sfinfo Song\ Name-Track01.wav File Name Song Name-Track01.wav File Format Microsoft RIFF

Hi, The --sign option in flac can be signed or unsigned, but the error message mentions "uint32_t". - Michael diff --git a/src/flac/main.c b/src/flac/main.c index 4e7361b3..c6d9b1e3 100644 --- a/src/flac/main.c +++ b/src/flac/main.c @@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ int parse_option(int short_option, const char *long_option, const char *option_a else if(0 == strncmp(option_argument,

Erik, I suspect /bin/sh being dash is what is causing the problem. I will rework the syntax. Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:59:50 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote:

Earl Chew wrote: > There is only one test to verify handling of harmonics of the filter table > sampling frequencies. Earl, I've had a couple of attempts to get this patch working, without luck. With this patch applied, when i run the test_metaflac.sh script, I get: Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: syntax error near unexpected token

OK, here's a problem: I want to set the album replay gain in each track, but I'm using grip to rip and encode the tracks one by one. grip knows that all the tracks are on a single album, but FLAC sees them one at a time. I put the --replay-gain option on the FLAC command line, so it emits four comments into the vorbis commebnt block, e.g.: comment[9]:

I don't recall seeing anything about how to apply the same gain to an album as opposed to a mix of tracks. Man page and site seem vacant on it. Any clues as to where to look? I looked at mpd but ended up not using it due it not working with my sound cards as I had them setup. I do remember there being a very good curses player though. Before leaving gnump3d worked quite well for me since

--- CE <ce7@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > I'm hoping to set up a headless system to playback my audio once I > get back home after an extended leave. Ideally I'd just ssh in and > use a curses based player to play back FLACs and mp3s. This leads me > to a few quesitons: > 1. What is the minimun processor speed needed to decode and play > flac files? I have an old

Thanks! You've been most informative. Do the command line options vary for album and track or is the album gain computed automatically if it's done on a batch of files? You Wrote: > > there are two tags for replaygain, the 'album' tag which applies > to the whole album, and 'track' tag for each track.

Thanks :D I did see that but wasn't sure if there was an option needed or how it decided to do the album gain. I fiddled with metaflac and checked for the REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN and my files seem to have it :D Suppose there is only 1 file to encode. Does FLAC still add the album gains? You Wrote: > see > http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation.html#flac_options_replay_gain >

Hi List, Is there a way to correctly use the replay-gain feature on flac files that contain an entire album (i.e., multiple tracks with seekpoints added from a cue sheet)? -- Chris

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:10:51AM -0500, Charles Velasquez wrote: > If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000 > converter dialogue box stating that "applying ReplayGain adjustment > during conversion will irreversibly alter data in encoded file, > unlike ReplayGain scan after encode"? ReplayGain, as the name implies, works by calculating a scaling-factor

Ah! metaflac, thanks, but won't this cause metaflac to combine flac's across directories and give an album replay gain for the combined flac's? (as opposed to separate albums i.e. metaflac /album1/*.flac /album2/*.flac as opposed to metaflac /album1/*.flac, metaflac /album2/*.flac) On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote: > Run from the top directory: > >