similar to: flac-dev Digest, Vol 122, Issue 2

Okay, I was thinking it may have been something to do with the header, but I wasn't sure how to verify that. thanks guys. On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

I'll try it, thanks. also do you know how to cross compile with MinGW? I'm trying on my Mac, because Visual Studio 2012 doesn't like the SLN, but it's not really working. :/ On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the

Do you have a source on the CoreAudio quality thing? I'd be very interested in reading more about that. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20150719/f37ce5e8/attachment.htm

Well, I'm bored, and I hope I'm not getting in the way of anyone, but I was like hell might as well try to make a new Xcode project, although I am using 10.8 with the latest xcode, so I'd have to manually remove that, but there is one serious concern, and that's that header files are being called from 1 directory up from where they are, for example: "share/compat.h"

Compiling on OS X 10.8 x86_64 as we speak. On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body

​Can you guys clarify that by Rice you don't mean unary coding, but exponential golomb coding? that issue has confused me before, and probably others.​ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20170523/525651dc/attachment.html>

Are we gonna get a new beta, or will it just be 1.3 release, also how long until the update? On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev > or, via

I have an Intel Mac and I'd be glad to test it for you, but I'm not sure how to use the makefile.lite build system? do I just replace the normal one with this one? I tried ./makefile.lite but nothing happened. On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 15.03.2013 12:09, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Marcus Johnson wrote: >> but no matter what you choose to do FLAC MUST REMAIN LOSSLESS. > > That has always been and will remain goal #1 for FLAC. FLAC stands for Free Lossless Audio Codec, so "lossy FLAC" is like "honest politician", or "fast turtle".

Here's the patch submit message for 4GB+ windows barrier. http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail//flac-dev/2013-March/003804.html On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

I posted Mac binaries a few weeks ago but nobody did anything with them, or even acknowledged them. Here is a DMG with a .pkg installer for Flac 1.3.0 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/52358991/FLACInstaller1.3.0.dmg On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To

I don't think you guys should worry too much about messing up old decoders, but no matter what you choose to do FLAC MUST REMAIN LOSSLESS. On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:06 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

It's not that hard to repackage it, is it? Here you go: www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/flac.xcodeproj .zip On 06-05-13 23:37, Marcus Johnson wrote: > Ralph, for Mac OS you should download either the Unarchiver which is > free, or Entrophy which is what I use, but it costs like $15 I > believe, both support decompressing .7z and Entrophy supports > compressing TO .7z > > > On

I'd love to fix the .Xcodeproj (which is what they're called now) but I don't have a clue how to, if I were to figure it out would you guys accept it, or is it not worth my time? btw, someone on Windows should get the visual studio files working, it always complains about not finding nasm.exe. On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send

On 07-05-13 07:43, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > It's not that hard to repackage it, is it? > > Here you go: www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/flac.xcodeproj .zip I don't know what went wrong with that link, but it should be http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/flac.xcodeproj.zip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Ralph, for Mac OS you should download either the Unarchiver which is free, or Entrophy which is what I use, but it costs like $15 I believe, both support decompressing .7z and Entrophy supports compressing TO .7z On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe or

I'm running El Capitan aka Darwin 15.4, I'll test the patch in just a sec. On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:00 AM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev > or, via email, send a

Dear list, I am currently investigating about the FLAC format and one thing I can't understand is the "WASTED BITS PER SAMPLE" flag. I've seen an explanation saying: "After decoding subframe decoder should bitwise shift all samples to left." Could anyone explain to me what this flag is for? Many thanks in advance. Regards, Fernando -------------- next

Martijn van Beurden wrote: > These files work fine, but nasm is indeed necessary. Read the README for > more information Oh, speaking of README ... Here is a tiny patch to align it with the renaming of configure.in. I also noticed two other things: - It says "To build FLAC with support for Ogg FLAC you must have built and installed libogg according to the specific instructions

That's true, TBB is limited in compatibility. I don't necessarily think that's where a parallel FLAC API should head, but they're something to be said for Intel's increasing openness with the project and the pipeline design itself. The pipeline could possible be ported to pthreads. Our project was conceived as a way to learn TBB by doing, so we didn't put any time/thought