similar to: Xiph and Sourceforge downloads sections

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > > > Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page > > https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads > > on Sourceforge and could use updating to the new binaries. > > I changed the link to point to: > > http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/ >

On 11/28/14 09:44 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > >> >MauritsVB wrote: >> > >>> > >Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page >>> > >https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads >>> > >on Sourceforge and could use updating to the new

How about using Sourceforge only for the most recent version? It would prevent any possible confusion (or the hassle with SF?s byzantine file interface) and if people are looking for older versions they could always go to http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/. On 29 Nov 2014, at 05:44, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > >>

> MauritsVB wrote: > >> Ars Technica reports of ?abandoned projects? on SourceForge being taken >> over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables. >> >> This might be something to be wary of with FLAC considering the main focus >> for FLAC has moved from SourceForge to Xiph.org. Perhaps consider to remove >> the downloads from

As we?re talking 1.3.1 release, I?ve been keeping track of a couple of changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might as well share here. The things between brackets are just to refresh memories, I?d leave them out of the actual changelog. * Improved efficiency of 24 bit decoding. (https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=ea0d5ddadc6902e873983c89f473130b3bb6625f) *

Ars Technica reports of ?abandoned projects? on SourceForge being taken over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables. arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/05/sourceforge-grabs-gimp-for-windows-account-wraps-installer-in-bundle-pushing-adware/ This might be something to be wary of with FLAC considering the main focus for FLAC has moved from SourceForge to Xiph.org.

Hi Erik, I noticed you’ve started compiling the changelog for 1.3.2. I have kept track of some of the bigger changes since 1.3.1 although admittedly haven’t been on top of it this year. Perhaps some of these older ones are useful to consider including: Fixed a segmentation fault in libFLAC http://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/425/ Changed the LPC order guess for a slight compression improvement,

On 28 May 2015, at 12:27, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> The response from SF suggests that it?s non-responsiveness from the >> original project owner. Hopefully it?s limited to that. > > Well for flac, thats Josh who has been non-responsive since 2009 > or so. > > Erik I meant who is registered as project

On 24 Nov 2014, at 10:13, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> As we?re talking 1.3.1 release, I?ve been keeping track of a couple of >> changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might >> as well share here. The things between brackets are just to refresh >> memories, I?d leave them out of the

I'd definately recommend binaries for download as suggested by lvqcl and Janne Hyv?rinen. All the fabolous work on the code base is of little use to me if I can not find binaries at the official site. Olav Sunde At 12:01 23.11.2014, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: >On 23.11.2014 12:44, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> lvqcl wrote: >>> 2) Do you plan to release any official binaries

If I recall correctly, with the release of 1.3.1 there were a few days between the version being released and the News and Changelog appearing on the site. This caused a number of sites to report the release without mentioning all the improvements in the update. Can I suggest that this time we publish the Changelog and News update immediately after uploading the final version? The Changelog is

I am working on creating a set of FLAC files for a ?decoder compliance test corpus? and am looking for examples of things that are part of the standard but not supported in the reference decoder. I am not looking for things missing from the reference encoder (such as variable block sizes). I seem to recall someone on this list (most likely lvqcl or Martijn van Beurden) mentioning something about

In this topic on Hydrogen Audio(http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=105586) someone asked a question about the sample rates that FLAC supports for ReplayGain. The outcome was that the current documentation of MetaFLAC is outdated since Commit http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=0554a4aee6966bc5b251364753ef85de72dfab19 because as of 1.3.0 FLAC supports Replaygain with many

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > I also notice that on sourceforge: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/flac/files/flac-win/ > > there are still 1000+ downloads per week 1.2.1 windows binaries > with know security holes. What do people think of the idea of > disabling downloads of old, known buggy Windows binary downlaods? FLAC 1.2.1 is the last version that works on

On 12/6/16, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> I noticed you’ve started compiling the changelog for 1.3.2. > > I had sort of hoped I'd finished :). Seems I was wrong! > >> I have kept track of some of the bigger changes since 1.3.1 although >> admittedly haven’t been on top of it this year. Perhaps some of these

I can confirm git head builds and passes /make fullcheck/ (skipping the noise part of test_streams.sh) on - armv6-linux (Raspbian), GCC 4.6 & GCC 4.8 - i686-pc-mingw32, GCC 4.8.1 - MSVC 2005 Express 32-bit (make fullcheck with MinGW) - MSVC 2013 Express 32-bit (make fullcheck with MinGW) Furthermore, I've also ran the test_streams.sh of FLAC 1.2.1 with FLAC 1.2.1 as encoder and git as

I just installed svn-1.3.1 from .dmg on an intel mac. I am getting ... subversion/libsvn_wc/log.c:338: (apr_err=155009) svn: In directory ''sr'' subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c:565: (apr_err=2) svn: Can''t copy ''sr/.svn/tmp/text-base/README.svn-base'' to ''sr/README.tmp'': No such file or directory Any one getting this? TIA for any help.

Hi all, As people may have seen there's a pre-release here: http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ Specifically: flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit binaries Please test. I'm particularly interested in hearing about the windows binaries which were cross compiled from Linux to Windows. Unfortunately there is a bug

On 23 Nov 2014, at 15:06, MauritsVB <mauritsvb at xs4all.nl> wrote: > > On 23 Nov 2014, at 14:49, Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Considering Windows binaries: in case no new binaries are provided, please at least remove the old ones from sourceforge. As can be gleaned from some bug reports, support requests etc. on sourceforge, people are still

Olav Sunde wrote: > under download, most links still point to Sourceforge with 1.2.1 as newest Where? On this page: https://xiph.org/flac/download.html there are links to OS specific builds of FLAC on sourceforge, but all the main links are to Xiph. Are you sure you're looking at the Xiph page and not the old sourceforge page that may have been cached by your browser? Erik --