similar to: Performance checks

Hi Martijn, I don?t know if it?s just my Firefox or whether something breaks during the parsing of the email but none of your links seem to work for me. I feel it might have something to do with the spaces in the file names of the PDFs, which doesn?t translate well to URLs. Thanks, Lennard > On 3 Feb 2016, at 18:04, Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Op

Op 02-02-16 om 16:54 schreef lvqcl: > BTW, 64-bit flac can benefit from 64-bit words in > bitreader/bitwriter routines. Currently it requires > --enable-64-bit-words switch in ./configure parameters. It > would be interesting to test its effect, especially on ARM. Okay, I might test that as well. I've checked performance with the brand new laptop my employer gave me, which is

Hi, Once again, I did some performance testing. Results are here: http://www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/Comparison on 32-bit ARM (Raspberry Pi B).pdf http://www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/Comparison on 64-bit Linux (2008 Intel).pdf I'll add some results for 64-bit Windows (2014 Intel with AVX2) in a few days. Results look nice, a 20% speedup on my x86_64 platform for the slowest mode. Not

Hi all, Here are two patches, one for flac.git and one for flac-website.git, which 'merges' them. This is mainly some cleanup work I did earlier on the website that were copied to the html docs, and documentation on new features (like Wave64 and RF64 support, --preserve-modtime etc.) that were copied the other way. *flac.git patch*

Hi all, Here are some patches updating the website. 1) Fixes the changelog.html menubar 2) Updates documentation 3) Updates news feed 4) Updates downloads and adds some links Patch 2 and 4 were to big for the list, unfortunately. They can be found here: http://www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/0002-Update-API-and-tools-documentation.patch.xz

Martijn van Beurden wrote: > op 27-06-14 14:11, Erik de Castro Lopo schreef: > > There has been at least one person on this list who is able to do > > perfromance tests on FLAC. I would appreciate it if someone could > > run such a performance test before and after the above commit. > > Are you specifically referring to the ARM platform or to any > platform? The

Hi all, This patch updates all pages of the website, updating the copyright notice to 2014, fixes *a lot* of broken links and fixes the issues raised by lvqcl on 19 Jun 2014. It's once again too large to send to the list directly, so here's the link: http://www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/0001-Fix-dead-links-and-copyright-year.patch

One more (big) website patch http://www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/0001-Update-links-and-news.patch.gz This one adds quite a few new stores to the links page, alters a few images and adds one new item

Hi all, With the patch I mailed earlier today, I found out a few adjustments could be made to the compression level settings.This retuning speeds up the encoding and improves compression, while not changing anything decoding-wise. Currently, compression settings are as follows -5, -l 8 -b 4096 -m -r 5 -A tukey(0.5) -6, -l 8 -b 4096 -m -r 6-A tukey(0.5) -7, -l 8 -b 4096 -m -e -r 6-A

Once more big patches, this time updating the comparison and links pages. http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/0001-Add-more-brands-to-links-page.patch http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/0002-Update-comparison.patch

I can confirm git head builds and passes /make fullcheck/ (skipping the noise part of test_streams.sh) on - armv6-linux (Raspbian), GCC 4.6 & GCC 4.8 - i686-pc-mingw32, GCC 4.8.1 - MSVC 2005 Express 32-bit (make fullcheck with MinGW) - MSVC 2013 Express 32-bit (make fullcheck with MinGW) Furthermore, I've also ran the test_streams.sh of FLAC 1.2.1 with FLAC 1.2.1 as encoder and git as

Op 02-02-16 om 18:22 schreef Martijn van Beurden: > Op 02-02-16 om 16:54 schreef lvqcl: >> BTW, 64-bit flac can benefit from 64-bit words in >> bitreader/bitwriter routines. Currently it requires >> --enable-64-bit-words switch in ./configure parameters. It >> would be interesting to test its effect, especially on ARM. > > Okay, I might test that as well. So,

On 26-05-13 14:20, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 26-05-13 11:33, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In my latest commit I have updated all version strings and copyright >> dates. > > Here are two patches for the website, updating the copyright as well > and copying the changelog. I would like to propose copying the > contents of flac-website.git

As promised (quite some time ago), a patch to clean up the source code documentation. The first patch is a remake of the FLAC logo in SVG, which third-party developers might appreciate. The second patch removes quite a lot of pages like those with the russian language and those that I thought are not really essential for off-line viewing/development. This reduction in page count might make

On 07-05-13 07:43, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > It's not that hard to repackage it, is it? > > Here you go: www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/flac.xcodeproj .zip I don't know what went wrong with that link, but it should be http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/flac.xcodeproj.zip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, It seems my e-mail is caught by the spam filter. Once again, a few patches for the FLAC website, this time linked instead of attached. http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/FLAC-website-news-updates.zip On 02-01-14 16:09, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > Hi, > > Once more a few patches for the FLAC website. The biggest change is > the inclusion of some old news items into the feed and

Hi all, The past few weeks I've been busy comparing lossless audio codecs to update the comparison.html page on the FLAC website (and because I wrote a comparison for Hydrogenaudio in the past) and its ready now. Because the patch is pretty large, I've placed it here: http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/update-comparison-and-fix-IE-news.patch.zip The reason to do this is because the

Hi, Once more a patch much too heavy for the list. This will be the last addition for links.html for a while, I think I really got them all now. This patch adds a bunch of brands (some high-profile like Sony, LG, ASUS) that have at least one FLAC-playing device in their line-up. http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/Add-9-more-brands-to-links-and-adding-news-item.patch.zip Considering

Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 12-12-12 19:47, Max Horn wrote: > I already submitted a patch (see the mailinglist for the 14th of > september) to update the news section (and to make it easier to update) > but no one has replied to that yet... Sorry, I can't find that patch. Can you resend it please? Erik --

For anyone wondering, here's a PDF comparing encoding speed, decoding speed and compression between FLAC 1.2.1, 1.3.0 and 1.3.1pre1. Compiles on a Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 (SSE up to and including 4.1, no AVX), Kubuntu 14.04.1, GCC 4.9.1. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: long set of samples-1.3.1pre1.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 16795