similar to: [PATCH 9] fix for padding with --replay-gain option

lvqcl wrote: > Fix for padding with --replay-gain option. Ported from flac 1.2.1 > maintenance branch: > > http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/flac/encode.c?r1=1.194&r2=1.194.2.1&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH > >

1) changelog.html "Add ability to handle utf8 filenames on Windows (large set of patches from Janne Hyv?rinen)" AFAIK Windows internally uses UTF-16LE, not UTF-8. IMHO it's better to use a general word 'Unicode' instead of 'utf8'. 2) documentation_bugs.html "The following are major known bugs in the current (1.2.1) release:" 1.2.1 is not the current

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > All 9 patchsets applied, tested and pushed. Thanks! Great, thanks. (Un)fortunately, I have yet more patches...

It's a port of two patches from 1.2.1 maintenance branch: http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/libFLAC/stream_decoder.c?r1=1.147&r2=1.147.2.1&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/libFLAC/stream_decoder.c?r1=1.147.2.1&r2=1.147.2.2&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH -------------- next part

If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain option, I get a warning about the --no-padding option... "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with --no-padding" ...even though I'm not using --no-padding. And the file does end up with a small padding block, so changing tags is slow. I'd fixed this bug in my own copy of flac 1.1.4, but forgot to submit the

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Scott F <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > > If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain > > option, I get a warning about the --no-padding > > option... > > > > "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with > > --no-padding" > > > > ...even though I'm

OK, here's a problem: I want to set the album replay gain in each track, but I'm using grip to rip and encode the tracks one by one. grip knows that all the tracks are on a single album, but FLAC sees them one at a time. I put the --replay-gain option on the FLAC command line, so it emits four comments into the vorbis commebnt block, e.g.: comment[9]:

Hi List, Is there a way to correctly use the replay-gain feature on flac files that contain an entire album (i.e., multiple tracks with seekpoints added from a cue sheet)? -- Chris

Ah! metaflac, thanks, but won't this cause metaflac to combine flac's across directories and give an album replay gain for the combined flac's? (as opposed to separate albums i.e. metaflac /album1/*.flac /album2/*.flac as opposed to metaflac /album1/*.flac, metaflac /album2/*.flac) On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote: > Run from the top directory: > >

I had completely forgotten about Replay Gain until Mr. Seibert reminded me. Wasn't there talk of adding this to vorbis-tools? Anyway, I went here: http://sjeng.sourceforge.net/ftp/vorbis/ And downloaded the source for the replay gain tool. Unfortunately, I cannot compile it. The errors regard parameters to ov_read_float. Is there updated source somewhere else? -- -:-:-

Wasn't sure whether to post this to <vorbis-dev> or <vorbis>. Have settled on <vorbis-dev>. Where can I find details on how to encode Replay Gain into Vorbis files? On the Wikipedia page at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replay_Gain it states: "FLAC and Ogg Vorbis use the REPLAYGAIN_* comment fields." but I can't find any reference to Replay Gain in

I have FLAC files that I would like to re-encode with --replay-gain. I have my Flac's organized in Artist/Album folders, so I should have no problem getting an album gain/peak per album. Do I need to first de-code the flac's to wav files and then "flac --replay-gain *.wav", or can this be accomplished by going to each Album directory and "flac -f --replay-gain

with the winamp vorbis input plugin, in the replay gain section of the configuration dialog, what does the use 6dB Hard Limiter checkbox do? Andy andycool22@peoplepc.com AndyCool22 on AIM http://livejournal.com/~andycool22 <p><p><p><p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list,

I just bought an I Audio mobile device (Btw, these thigns are the coolest players on the face of the earth.. might want to check em out). It plays ogg vorbis files rather nicely. My whole music library is sitting in flac format. When I encoded my flac files (the majority a year ago) I used replay gain to save the album and track information if the flac file. Unfortunately, the I audio doesnt like

Erik, I suspect /bin/sh being dash is what is causing the problem. I will rework the syntax. Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:59:50 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote:

--- CE <ce7@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > I'm hoping to set up a headless system to playback my audio once I > get back home after an extended leave. Ideally I'd just ssh in and > use a curses based player to play back FLACs and mp3s. This leads me > to a few quesitons: > 1. What is the minimun processor speed needed to decode and play > flac files? I have an old

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:10:51AM -0500, Charles Velasquez wrote: > If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000 > converter dialogue box stating that "applying ReplayGain adjustment > during conversion will irreversibly alter data in encoded file, > unlike ReplayGain scan after encode"? ReplayGain, as the name implies, works by calculating a scaling-factor

Dat Head <dathead2 at gmail.com> wrote: > can somebody explain replaygain a bit - is it kinda like normalization > but w/o modifying > the files (just giving software a number to use to obtain the level > boost needed?) Try http://www.replaygain.org/ although the pages haven't been updated since 2001. (In the past I have e-mailed updates to the maintainer, but got no

When I run it (OS X 10.6.2), find builds a list across multiple directories and then runs metaflac, causing metaflac to report. "The FLAC file could not be opened. Most likely the file does not exist or is not readable." I would think this is the expected result as " {} + " is the same as -execdir, except that ``{}'' is replaced with as many pathnames as possible for