similar to: Shorewall 1.4.7

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta Problems Corrected since version 1.4.6: 1) Corrected problem in 1.4.6 where the MANGLE_ENABLED variable was being tested before it was set. 2) Corrected handling of MAC addresses in the SOURCE column of the tcrules file. Previously, these addresses resulted in an invalid iptables command. 3) The

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots Problems Corrected since version 1.4.6: 1) Corrected problem in 1.4.6 where the MANGLE_ENABLED variable was being tested before it was set. 2) Corrected handling of MAC addresses in the SOURCE column of the tcrules file. Previously, these addresses resulted in an invalid iptables command. 3) The

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots Release Notes are attached Changes since last Snapshot: a) The per-interface dynamic blacklisting chains are now displayed by "shorewall monitor" b) IP Traffic Accounting support has been added. c) Rules may now be rate-limited. d) Bridge interfaces (br[0-9]) may now appear in entries in the

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots Problems Corrected since version 1.4.6: 1) Corrected problem in 1.4.6 where the MANGLE_ENABLED variable was being tested before it was set. 2) Corrected handling of MAC addresses in the SOURCE column of the tcrules file. Previously, these addresses resulted in an invalid iptables command. 3)

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Snapshots Problems Corrected since version 1.4.6: 1) Corrected problem in 1.4.6 where the MANGLE_ENABLED variable was being tested before it was set. 2) Corrected handling of MAC addresses in the SOURCE column of the tcrules file. Previously, these addresses resulted in an invalid iptables command.

Hello all: I''ve got a confusing issue. I had a working shorewall configuration (based on the two interface model) using DNAT for redirection to my HTTP server. The HTTP server is on my inside network (I know - bad juju, but one thing at a time). I changed my configuration this morning to use views in my BIND (named) configuration. Everyone outside the firewall is able to get in

Shorewall 2.2.0 is expected to be released in the February/March timeframe so it is now time to begin thinking about preparing to upgrade. This is particularly important for those of you still running Shorewall 1.4 since support for that version will end with the release of 2.2. For those of you still running Shorewall 1.4, here are some things that you can do ahead of time to ease the upgrade to

Hi all, I have a strange problem in trying to install a transparent proxy (in my internal net not on the shorewall server) according to the instructions as outlined in http://www.shorewall.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html#Local My Network looks the following: Internal Net: 10.0.0.0/24 Squid Server listening on port 3128 (ip 10.0.0.152, DNS name server01) | |

Just some stuff that was laying around in CVS: 1. Added ''DNAT-'' target. 2. Print policies in ''check'' command. 3. Added CLEAR_TC option. 4. Added SHARED_DIR option. [teastep@wookie Shorewall]$ cat releasenotes.txt This is a minor release of Shorewall that has a couple of new features. New features include: 1) A new ''DNAT-'' action has been

Shorewall 2.2.0 is expected to be released in the February/March timeframe so it is now time to begin thinking about preparing to upgrade. This is particularly important for those of you still running Shorewall 1.4 since support for that version will end with the release of 2.2. For those of you still running Shorewall 1.4, here are some things that you can do ahead of time to ease the upgrade to

I am puzzled. I started setting up a new box last week with Linux 2.6.10. Everything was working fine until I went to start shorewall, when all network traffic stopped. I have little doubt that it is because I missed something in configuring the machine. I''m running shorewall 2.2 and the zone, policy, and rules files are cut and paste from a machine that has been running for over a

Okay, no one had any idea concerning my Radmin question, which I still haven''t figured out. However, I am now trying to figure out an FXP problem. All of the needed details are listed below the description problem. Problem: I have a local windows XP pro computer running FlashFXP behind shorewall 2.0.9 (unpatched) with only two interfaces (ppp0 and eth1) as loc:192.168.1.5. The server

Shorewall 2.0.0 is now in Beta so this is a good time to begin thinking about preparing to migrate to the 2.0 Shorewall series. Shorewall 2.0 makes a number of incompatible changes in the configuration files. Luckily, you will be able to make changes ahead of time to your 1.4 configuration that will ease the migration when the time comes. a) Shorewall 2.0 doesn''t allow you to specify

Shorewall 1.4.6 is now available. Thanks to Francesca Smith, the 1.4.6 Sample configurations are also available. The release is currently available at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall It will be available at the other mirrors shortly. This is a minor release of Shorewall. Problems Corrected: 1) A problem seen on RH7.3 systems where Shorewall encountered

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In this release: 1) Dynamic Ipsec Zones now work. 2) Output Traffic Accounting by user/group is supported (thanks to Tuomas Jormola). 3) The following negative test options are added in /etc/shorewall/ipsec and /etc/shorewall/masq: reqid!=<number> spi!=<number> proto!=esp|ah|ipcomp mode!=tunnel|transport

I have a dsl modem and two static IP addresses: 66.17.65.22 and 66.17.65.161. I am using the standard configuration from the Shorewall Setup Guide for multiple IP addresses and modifications suggested by the Aliased Interfaces Guide. I want to set up a shorewall 2.08 router for my home (Fedora Core 2 / kernel 2.6.8-1.521). I want share an internet connection with some pc''son a local

Hello. I'm getting trouble with the ADMINISABSENTMINDED option, it doesn't seem to work as stated in the manual. When using the default ADMINISABSENTMINDED=Yes and no routestopped file, here are the firewall state after executing shorewall stop : Chain INPUT (policy DROP 473 packets, 106K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

"Dark Ryder" has reported a bug in Shorewall 1.4.7; this bug is also present in Shorewall 1.4.8. The effect of the bug is that in DNAT rules that specify SNAT, the SNAT address can be effectively ignored in some cases. I have created corrected versions of the ''firewall'' script for both 1.4.7 (based on 1.4.7c) and 1.4.8; these corrections may be downloaded from the

Hey First, apologies if this went out twice. I sent the original email from an odd email configuration (essentially from an alias of what I signed up as). I searched and noticed that my post did not appear and I did not get a bounce back so I was confused. I waited a few days before resending. So apologies if this goes out twice. I am not trying to spam. I was hoping someone could help me with

Dear list, I''m running Shorewall on a dedicated Fedora 7 box. Shorewall is working well as an office DSL router (dynamic IP) with loc and dmz zones. I am now trying to configure IPSec to connect a VPS, "casp", with a static IP to both the firewall and to the loc network behind it. The host to host SA works fine. However, pings from "loc" to "casp" can be