similar to: [PATCH website] Even more brands for links and sourceforge pages

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[PATCH website] Even more brands for links and sourceforge pages"

2013 Jun 25
2
Sourceforge pages (was: Even more brands for links and sourceforge pages)
On 05-06-13 00:27, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Martijn van Beurden wrote: >> Considering flac.sourceforge.net, is this ever going to be updated? In >> case it should be redirected, I checked on my own sourceforge project >> webpage, adding the following two lines to .htaccess should redirect >> traffic to any resource on flac.sourceforge.net to xiph.org/flac >>
2013 Jun 04
0
[PATCH website] Even more brands for links and sourceforge pages
Martijn van Beurden wrote: > Hi, > > Once more a patch much too heavy for the list. This will be the last > addition for links.html for a while, I think I really got them all now. > This patch adds a bunch of brands (some high-profile like Sony, LG, > ASUS) that have at least one FLAC-playing device in their line-up. Martijn, I notice that in the feeds/feed.xml file there
2013 Jun 05
1
[PATCH website] Even more brands for links and sourceforge pages
On 05-06-13 10:41, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Have you tried replacing the "GET" here: > > xhttp.open("GET",dname,false); > xhttp.send(""); > return xhttp.responseXML; > > with a "POST" operation instead? See the "GET or POST?" section of this > page: Right, I didn't know about that. Here's a patch, it
2013 Jun 05
2
[PATCH website] Even more brands for links and sourceforge pages
On 05-06-13 00:45, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > I notice that in the feeds/feed.xml file there is a item titled "Sony > launches its first FLAC-playing receiver" but that does not show up on > https://xiph.org/flac/news.html. Any idea what's going on here? Yeah, sure, I have that all the time. The weird thing is that even when using Ctrl+F5, my browser (Firefox)
2013 Sep 30
2
[PATCH] Update links and comparison
Once more big patches, this time updating the comparison and links pages. http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/0001-Add-more-brands-to-links-page.patch http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/0002-Update-comparison.patch
2013 May 13
1
[PATCH] Add brands to links.html and cleanup
Hi, This patch adds four more brands to the links page (and images of their products) and fixes a few broken links. Because of the images the patch is too big to mail over the list http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/update-links.html.patch.gz
2014 Jan 02
1
[PATCH] Update news flac website
Hi all, It seems my e-mail is caught by the spam filter. Once again, a few patches for the FLAC website, this time linked instead of attached. http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/FLAC-website-news-updates.zip On 02-01-14 16:09, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > Hi, > > Once more a few patches for the FLAC website. The biggest change is > the inclusion of some old news items into the feed and
2013 Jan 06
3
[PATCH] Website comparison + fix IE
Hi all, The past few weeks I've been busy comparing lossless audio codecs to update the comparison.html page on the FLAC website (and because I wrote a comparison for Hydrogenaudio in the past) and its ready now. Because the patch is pretty large, I've placed it here: http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/update-comparison-and-fix-IE-news.patch.zip The reason to do this is because the
2013 May 26
6
Anything else for Flac 1.3.0?
On 26-05-13 14:20, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 26-05-13 11:33, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In my latest commit I have updated all version strings and copyright >> dates. > > Here are two patches for the website, updating the copyright as well > and copying the changelog. I would like to propose copying the > contents of flac-website.git
2012 Dec 12
3
Status of flac; new release?
Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 12-12-12 19:47, Max Horn wrote: > I already submitted a patch (see the mailinglist for the 14th of > september) to update the news section (and to make it easier to update) > but no one has replied to that yet... Sorry, I can't find that patch. Can you resend it please? Erik --
2012 Aug 30
2
The FLAC website
Sorry, for the late repsonse Martijn. I've been crazy busy. Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 28-08-12 10:46, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > I think thats a great idea. WOuld be happy to have someone pick > > this up and run with it. > > So I got busy but stumbled upon several things. I'm not sure why there > are two boxes displaying the same news on the homepage
2012 Aug 28
3
The FLAC website
Martijn van Beurden wrote: > I can't read russian, but that part of the website seems pretty > outdated, mentioning FLAC 1.1 as the last news item? I have no problem dropping that. > I guess I would like to update the news section with a few items (I > guess that's what makes a website looks 'fresh', I would love to make > FLAC look like an active project :))
2013 Jan 26
2
[PATCH] Various website edits
Hi all, One again a few patches that are too large to send directly over the mailing list (because of the blobs, large differences etc.) 1) Removes the russian part of the website, because it is 10 years out of date (FLAC 1.1.0) 2) Gives the website a maximum width, because at large screens it tends to become unreadable 3) Completely overhauls the links pages: new devices that support FLAC
2013 May 07
1
flac-dev Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7
On 07-05-13 07:43, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > It's not that hard to repackage it, is it? > > Here you go: www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/flac.xcodeproj .zip I don't know what went wrong with that link, but it should be http://www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/flac.xcodeproj.zip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2014 Nov 28
3
[PATCH] Update website
Hi all, Here are some patches updating the website. 1) Fixes the changelog.html menubar 2) Updates documentation 3) Updates news feed 4) Updates downloads and adds some links Patch 2 and 4 were to big for the list, unfortunately. They can be found here: http://www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/0002-Update-API-and-tools-documentation.patch.xz
2013 May 29
2
Performance checks
On 28-05-13 20:09, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: > On Windows the 32-bit NASM enabled compiles are always fastest. If you > can run 32-bit code on your Linux box you should compile with assembly > optimizations. That depends on the way you define speed. For decoding this doesn't seem to be true. I reran my tests, it took a little longer because I couldn't believe the results I got.
2013 Sep 16
2
[PATCH] Clean up source code documentation
As promised (quite some time ago), a patch to clean up the source code documentation. The first patch is a remake of the FLAC logo in SVG, which third-party developers might appreciate. The second patch removes quite a lot of pages like those with the russian language and those that I thought are not really essential for off-line viewing/development. This reduction in page count might make
2014 Jul 02
1
[PATCH] Fix website links
Hi all, This patch updates all pages of the website, updating the copyright notice to 2014, fixes *a lot* of broken links and fixes the issues raised by lvqcl on 19 Jun 2014. It's once again too large to send to the list directly, so here's the link: http://www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/0001-Fix-dead-links-and-copyright-year.patch
2014 Jul 03
1
[PATCH] Update website links
One more (big) website patch http://www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/0001-Update-links-and-news.patch.gz This one adds quite a few new stores to the links page, alters a few images and adds one new item
2016 Feb 02
2
Performance tests
Op 02-02-16 om 16:54 schreef lvqcl: > BTW, 64-bit flac can benefit from 64-bit words in > bitreader/bitwriter routines. Currently it requires > --enable-64-bit-words switch in ./configure parameters. It > would be interesting to test its effect, especially on ARM. Okay, I might test that as well. I've checked performance with the brand new laptop my employer gave me, which is