Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Performance checks"
2013 Jun 03
1
Performance checks
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 02:33:55PM +0300, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
> On 1.6.2013 14:24, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
> > I can confirm. I see 10% speed improvement with that change on Core i7.
> > Decoding a 1h18min38.133s long test FLAC -8 encoded file takes with
> > normal asm optimizations 7.656s (speed: 616,266x realtime) and with that
> > tiny change 6.937s (speed: 680,140x
2013 Jun 01
0
Performance checks
On 1.6.2013 14:24, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
> On 31.5.2013 13:04, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 04:08:57PM +0200, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
>>> I was surprised to see that the Windows compile on wine actually
>>> outperformed the native Linux one. Probably GCC 4.6 optimized a little
>>> better or something very weird is going on in wine, I
2013 Jun 01
2
Performance checks
On 31.5.2013 13:04, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 04:08:57PM +0200, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
>> I was surprised to see that the Windows compile on wine actually
>> outperformed the native Linux one. Probably GCC 4.6 optimized a little
>> better or something very weird is going on in wine, I don't know. The
>> assembly optimizations work very
2013 May 29
2
Performance checks
On 28-05-13 20:09, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
> On Windows the 32-bit NASM enabled compiles are always fastest. If you
> can run 32-bit code on your Linux box you should compile with assembly
> optimizations.
That depends on the way you define speed. For decoding this doesn't seem
to be true. I reran my tests, it took a little longer because I couldn't
believe the results I got.
2013 Apr 10
0
flac 1.3.0pre3 pre-release
On 10.4.2013 13:06, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
> On 10.4.2013 10:39, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
>> On 08-04-13 22:00, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>>> On 8.4.2013 21:38, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>>>> Friendly people on Hydrogenaudio found some bugs with the Unicode
>>>> printing code, so I was forced to make adjustments.
>>>> [...]
>>> The long
2013 Apr 10
2
flac 1.3.0pre3 pre-release
On 10.4.2013 10:39, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
> On 08-04-13 22:00, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>> On 8.4.2013 21:38, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>>> Friendly people on Hydrogenaudio found some bugs with the Unicode
>>> printing code, so I was forced to make adjustments.
>>> [...]
>> The long line patch is broken and requires much more work, please
>> ignore
2014 Sep 26
2
Patch to improve malformed vorbiscomment handling
Sorry for spamming but in the haste I forgot the stream_decoder part out.
On 26.9.2014 15:47, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
> On 26.9.2014 15:21, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>> Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>>
>>> Patch v2, now handles more malformed cases. Original patch was for a
>>> file for which I had a sample from a user but this allows handling some
>>> manually
2014 Nov 23
2
New release
I'd definately recommend binaries for download as suggested by lvqcl and Janne Hyv?rinen. All the fabolous work on the code base is of little use to me if I can not find binaries at the official site.
Olav Sunde
At 12:01 23.11.2014, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>On 23.11.2014 12:44, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>> lvqcl wrote:
>>> 2) Do you plan to release any official binaries
2013 May 07
0
flac-dev Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7
It's not that hard to repackage it, is it?
Here you go: www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/flac.xcodeproj .zip
On 06-05-13 23:37, Marcus Johnson wrote:
> Ralph, for Mac OS you should download either the Unarchiver which is
> free, or Entrophy which is what I use, but it costs like $15 I
> believe, both support decompressing .7z and Entrophy supports
> compressing TO .7z
>
>
> On
2013 Apr 05
1
flac 1.3.0pre3 pre-release
On 1.4.2013 16:04, LRN wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01.04.2013 16:55, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>> On 1.4.2013 15:29, LRN wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 01.04.2013 16:24, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>>>> I'm worried about some of the modifications done to the UTF-8
2013 Mar 19
1
Patch to add Unicode filename support for win32 flac
On 19.3.2013 19:13, LRN wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 19.03.2013 20:35, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>> On 19.3.2013 15:49, JonY wrote:
>>> On 3/19/2013 19:59, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>>>> On 18.3.2013 12:25, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>>>>> JonY wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Before anyone does
2013 May 06
2
flac-dev Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7
Ralph, for Mac OS you should download either the Unarchiver which is free,
or Entrophy which is what I use, but it costs like $15 I believe, both
support decompressing .7z and Entrophy supports compressing TO .7z
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
> flac-dev at xiph.org
>
> To subscribe or
2013 Mar 19
0
Patch to add Unicode filename support for win32 flac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 19.03.2013 20:35, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>
> On 19.3.2013 15:49, JonY wrote:
>> On 3/19/2013 19:59, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>>> On 18.3.2013 12:25, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>>>> JonY wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Before anyone does anything, see __wgetmainargs
>>>>>
2013 Apr 01
0
flac 1.3.0pre3 pre-release
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01.04.2013 16:55, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>
> On 1.4.2013 15:29, LRN wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 01.04.2013 16:24, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>>> I'm worried about some of the modifications done to the UTF-8
>>> patch. In commit 2199d086921eb37d249cae0731f334556ec6209d
2013 Apr 23
2
Fwd: Metaflac UTF-8 fixes
Ooops? I accidently sent a reply privately instead of to the list,
sorry for that.
Here it is again, this time hopefully to the list:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Johnny Rosenberg <gurus.knugum at gmail.com>
Date: 2013/4/23
Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Metaflac UTF-8 fixes
To: Janne Hyv?rinen <cse at sci.fi>
2013/4/23 Janne Hyv?rinen <cse at sci.fi>:
> Hopefully
2013 May 23
1
flac-dev Digest, Vol 102, Issue 18
Are we gonna get a new beta, or will it just be 1.3 release, also how long
until the update?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote:
> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
> flac-dev at xiph.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
> or, via
2014 Nov 23
0
New release
There have been some offers to help building for various platforms: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-July/004271.html and there was discussion last year to create official ?blessed builds?, compiled by Xiph for security reasons. http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-July/004274.html
However, this sounds like something that can be sorted out after the release of the source
2013 Mar 13
3
flac 1.3.0pre2 pre-release
Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
> I re-did the patch with these limitations. I also noticed I had left
> stat() and fstat() functions unfixed previously. And encoder was limited
> to 4G in many places when printing status info.
Unfortunately, this patch did not apply cleanly.
There were two problems; one in src/flac/main.c that was easy and
obvious to fix, the other in include/share/compat.h.
2013 Mar 14
2
flac 1.3.0pre2 pre-release
Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
> The patch was made from the published pre2 version. It missed the MinGW
> changes that were applied to git version.
Patch applied. Thanks.
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
2013 Mar 14
4
flac 1.3.0pre2 pre-release
Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
>
> On 14.3.2013 9:37, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > Janne Hyv?rinen wrote:
> >
> >> The patch was made from the published pre2 version. It missed the MinGW
> >> changes that were applied to git version.
> > Patch applied. Thanks.
> >
> > Erik
>
> Unfortunately with this commit the LRN's patch from commit