similar to: 1.2.0: Test suite failures on LP64 archs?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "1.2.0: Test suite failures on LP64 archs?"

2007 Sep 01
2
Re: 1.2.0: Test suite failures on LP64 archs?
Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: > #0 0x0000000040d18810 in FLAC__lpc_compute_residual_from_qlp_coefficients_wide > (data=0x49e4c014, data_len=110, qlp_coeff=0x7f7ffffece70, order=1, > lp_quantization=14, residual=0x4fced000) at lpc.c:745 > 745 residual[i] = > data[i] - (FLAC__int32)((qlp_coeff[0] *
2004 Sep 10
3
Altivec, automake
I think I've gotten FLAC__lpc_restore_signal() about as good as I'm going to get it. Here's what I have: -a new file, lpc_asm.s, which has the assembly routines -changes to cpu.h, cpu.c, and stream_decoder.c to enable them -changes to configure.in to support the new cpu stuff -a preliminary Makefile.am -maybe something else I'm forgetting Now automake complains that configure.in
2004 Oct 06
3
flac-1.1.1 completely broken on linux/ppc and on macosx if built with the standard toolchain (not xcode)
Sadly the latest optimization broke completely everything. The asm code isn't gas compliant. the libFLAC linker script has a typo, disabling the asm optimization and/or altivec won't let a correct build anyway. Instant fixes for the asm stuff: sed -i -e"s:;:\#:" on the lpc_asm.s to load address instead of addis+ori you could use lis and la and PLEASE use the @l(register)
2005 Jan 29
4
A couple of points about flac 1.1.1 on ppc/linux/altivec
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, John Steele Scott wrote: > That looks fine to me as well. However, the best solution is something which > Luca suggested a few months ago, which is to use the functions defined in > altivec.h. These are C functions which map directly to Altivec machine > instructions. I am willing to help out, but I don't find the current lpc_asm.s > very easy to follow, and
2007 Sep 14
4
Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams fails
Hi list, I am trying to compile and install flac 1.2. I $ ./configure(d) and $ make(d) without any errors or warnings. However I get the following error when $ make check(ing): > Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams... > fsd24-01 (--channels=1 --bps=24 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p): encode...ERROR > during encode of fsd24-01 > FAIL: ./test_streams.sh > ===================
2005 Oct 25
2
Re: Reg. FLAC decoding
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you., I was working on something else and just now got FLAC to work. Ok., FLAC files are playing now :) Cheers. There is a slight noise happening in the background., which i'm figuring out. I hope that it'll be solved soon. However, i wanted to know if there are any ARM specific optimizations that can be done. The processor is a 166MHz processor. Do
2013 Oct 04
2
Again about encoding speed of different compiles
I downloaded current version of FLAC sources and compiled it with: * GCC 4.8.1 (MSYS from http://xhmikosr.1f0.de/tools/) * Intel C++ Composer XE 2013 update 5 * MSVS 2010 SP1 * MSVS 2012 update 3 (SSSE3 and SSE4.1 code was disabled for all compilers) Stereo 24-bit WAV file was encoded with -8 preset. Encoding time, in seconds: GCC 32-bit: 209 ICC 32-bit: 130 VS10 32-bit: 116 VS12 32-bit: 114
2004 Dec 28
2
libFLAC bitbuffer optimizations
Pulled from my Arch archive, this following patch seems to have made quite a difference in getting my ARM7TDMI chip to play FLAC (compression levels 0-2) on my ipod. I don't have benchmarks with hard numbers, but playing with skips vs playing without skips is a fairly noticeable difference. memcpy and memset on uClibc are optimized in asm for the ARM7TDMI in uClibc. Other hardware/libc
2005 Feb 02
0
two small-ish optimizations (death by a thousand cuts)
This lpc_restore_order was partially inspired by Miroslav's affd, though my (not very great) ARM asm version resembled this, as well. The other two reduce CPU array indexing overhead in loops a little. Additionally, a request for help: My not very optimized lpc_restore_signal is at the below URL, I couldn't get the ldm* instructions to work as advertised, even though I've talked
2004 Sep 10
2
better seeking
When I was trying to find yesterday's xmms-plugin bug, i have noticed that seeking in stream without seek-table isn't very good. With attached patch it is much better. -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next part -------------- --- src/libFLAC/seekable_stream_decoder.c.orig 2003-02-26 19:41:51.000000000 +0100 +++ src/libFLAC/seekable_stream_decoder.c 2003-07-09 23:49:35.000000000 +0200
2006 Oct 28
3
better seeking
Ok, the patch from 2003 about improving seeking still didn't make it to CVS, so here is another try. I made some benchmarking with the test_seeking utility from flac sources to show how bad the current seeking is, especially without seektable. Track used for the experiment had about 50 minutes. In the following table is average number of seeks and number of decoded frames required for one
2004 Sep 10
4
bitbuffer optimizations
Ok, here is a patch waiting for new CVS :). It works fine for me, but please check it before commiting... -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next part -------------- --- src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c.orig 2003-01-30 17:36:01.000000000 +0100 +++ src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c 2003-01-30 21:53:18.000000000 +0100 @@ -51,6 +51,25 @@ */ static const unsigned FLAC__BITBUFFER_DEFAULT_CAPACITY = ((65536 - 64) *
2007 Sep 14
0
Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams fails
--- Daniel Aleksandersen <aleksandersen+xiphlists@runbox.com> wrote: > Hi list, > > I am trying to compile and install flac 1.2. I $ ./configure(d) and $ > > make(d) without any errors or warnings. However I get the following > error > when $ make check(ing): > > > Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams... > > fsd24-01 (--channels=1 --bps=24 -0
2007 Sep 14
1
Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams fails
On 2007-09-15, Josh wrote: > --- Daniel Aleksandersen <aleksandersen+xiphlists@runbox.com> wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > I am trying to compile and install flac 1.2. I $ ./configure(d) and $ > > > > make(d) without any errors or warnings. However I get the following > > error > > > > when $ make check(ing): > > > Testing 24-bit
2004 Oct 01
1
[PATCH] fix compile errors with asm disabled
The #endifs are mismatched, and my builds were failing because lpc_restore_signal* weren't getting declared. I've also commented the endifs to make them easier to match. Also, is there any reason #ifdefs for FLAC__HAS_NASM and FLAC__CPU_IA32 are separate and nested the way they are and not combined like this?: #if defined(FLAC__CPU_IA32) && defined(FLAC__HAS_NASM) I'm not
2004 Sep 10
3
const issue in FLAC__lpc_compute_residual_from_qlp_coefficients (libFLAC/lpc.c:233)
Hello, I just tried to compile libFLAC (using Borland C++ Builder 6 on Windows). The compilers yells at me on line 233 of libFLAC/lpc.c *(residual++) = *(data++) - (sum >> lp_quantization); --> data is const and cannot be modified Funny thing is, if data is declared: const FLAC__int32 *data instead of const FLAC__int32 data[] everything is ok. Is this a bug in my compiler, or
2004 Sep 10
2
Altivec, automake
Here's what I listed in that email. Merging doesn't appear to be necessary. If you have any build problems, let me know. Note that my detection code is Darwin-specific. It's a BSD call (sysctl()), so a change to the platform-detection macros should enable it to work on other BSDs. However, I don't know what that would be, and I couldn't determine any safe way to do the check
2014 Jan 14
1
PATCH for lpc_asm.nasm
1) Two comments ";ASSERT(lp_quantization <= 31)" in the new functions ..._wide_asm_ia32() -- just to mention this constraint. (max. possible value of lp_quantization is 15, so it's not a problem) 2) "mov cl, ..." was replaced with "mov ecx, ..." (again Agner Fog, optimizing_assembly.pdf) summary: write to a partial register may result in false dependencies
2014 Jan 24
2
PATCH for lpc_intrin_sse41.c: faster shifts
It turns out that int64 shift is quite slow... This patch changes the code from: (FLAC__int32)(xmm.m128i_i64[0] >> lp_quantization) into: _mm_cvtsi128_si32(_mm_srli_epi64(xmm, lp_quantization)); Encoding of 24-bit .wav files with 32-bit FLAC became noticeably faster. The new code works only if quantization <= 32, but its max value is 15 so the code always work. (max_shiftlimit == (1
2004 Sep 10
2
const issue in FLAC__lpc_compute_residual_from_qlp_coefficients (libFLAC/lpc.c:233)
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:04:48PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Denis Chatelain <listes@octopodus.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > I just tried to compile libFLAC (using Borland C++ Builder 6 on > > Windows). > > > > The compilers yells at me on line 233 of libFLAC/lpc.c > > > > *(residual++) = *(data++) - (sum >>