similar to: Bug Report. Replay-gain and ogg.

Hello. I thought I'd introduce myself. I'm the guy that wrote kexis way back when. For those of you that dont know, kexis was written before flac, and pretty much does what flac does, although its not nearly as nice or robust. I wrote kexis actualy cause I was interested in playing around with lossless compression and shorten was about the only tool that was linux friendly, but had a

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 14:30, Joshua M. Brown wrote: > Would someone pleeeeeeease put a filter on this list to stop all the > nonsense messages my inbox keeps getting hit with from this list? > > thanks. > > j > I second that. It's getting insane.

I did some research on patent claims on range and arithmetic coding. The original range code pdf presented in the UK by an ibm employee at the time asserts no patent claims what so ever. If there are patents I cant find em. I have the original paper in PDF if anyone cares to see it. Its a good candidate for encoding because browsing a few of the implememntations avaialable on line, I can roll my

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:10:51AM -0500, Charles Velasquez wrote: > If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000 > converter dialogue box stating that "applying ReplayGain adjustment > during conversion will irreversibly alter data in encoded file, > unlike ReplayGain scan after encode"? ReplayGain, as the name implies, works by calculating a scaling-factor

Erik ? ? Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK ? ? ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: syntax error near unexpected token `then' ? ? ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: `? then' Do both /bin/bash and /bin/dash give exactly the same error message ? Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew

Erik, I cannot reproduce the problem you see with either dash(1) or bash(1). > test case62: --import-picture-from... OK > Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 8000 (8000 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 11025 (11025 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 11025 (11025 x 1) ... OK > Testing FLAC replaygain 12000 (12000 x 1) ... OK >

--- CE <ce7@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > I'm hoping to set up a headless system to playback my audio once I > get back home after an extended leave. Ideally I'd just ssh in and > use a curses based player to play back FLACs and mp3s. This leads me > to a few quesitons: > 1. What is the minimun processor speed needed to decode and play > flac files? I have an old

Dat Head <dathead2 at gmail.com> wrote: > can somebody explain replaygain a bit - is it kinda like normalization > but w/o modifying > the files (just giving software a number to use to obtain the level > boost needed?) Try http://www.replaygain.org/ although the pages haven't been updated since 2001. (In the past I have e-mailed updates to the maintainer, but got no

I'm hoping to set up a headless system to playback my audio once I get back home after an extended leave. Ideally I'd just ssh in and use a curses based player to play back FLACs and mp3s. This leads me to a few quesitons: 1. What is the minimun processor speed needed to decode and play flac files? I have an old P100 I would like to use for the task if it is sufficient. 2. When

On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 23:44, Josh Coalson wrote: > Miroslav did some experiments with searching for optimum blocksize. > from what I remember it made at best a couple percent difference. > there was a thread about it here a while back. > Did his changes make it in? I can think of a coupla ways to approach this and I'd like to hear about what he tried. A couple of % doesnt seem

Hello everyone, I'm new to this flac thing (started about a week ago) but I have read a lot about flac and replaygain. As far as I understand it, replaygain is lossless in the sense that I can tell my player to ignore the settings or I can even use foobar2000 to remove the tags entirely, hence getting back to the original audio. If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000

Thanks! You've been most informative. Do the command line options vary for album and track or is the album gain computed automatically if it's done on a batch of files? You Wrote: > > there are two tags for replaygain, the 'album' tag which applies > to the whole album, and 'track' tag for each track.

The test is rather simple, and only compares the computed output values for a 1kHz signal at the known filter table sampling frequencies with previously obained golden values. As such, the test only verifies that the performance of the replay gain analyser has not changed. A better test would be to compare the computed value with an independently obtain theorectical value. This is possible by

I don't recall seeing anything about how to apply the same gain to an album as opposed to a mix of tracks. Man page and site seem vacant on it. Any clues as to where to look? I looked at mpd but ended up not using it due it not working with my sound cards as I had them setup. I do remember there being a very good curses player though. Before leaving gnump3d worked quite well for me since

I have FLAC files that I would like to re-encode with --replay-gain. I have my Flac's organized in Artist/Album folders, so I should have no problem getting an album gain/peak per album. Do I need to first de-code the flac's to wav files and then "flac --replay-gain *.wav", or can this be accomplished by going to each Album directory and "flac -f --replay-gain

Hi Everyone, I'm new to asterisk and trying to get together the hardware to run a few POTS phone extentions and one or two POTS lines for starters. For these low port counts, I could just go with FXS and FXO cards, but... I can get a Cisco MC3810 with a mixture of FXO and FXS ports, the MC3810 comes with a built in ethernet port and I believe it does SIP too... Will this mean that I

Erik, I suspect /bin/sh being dash is what is causing the problem. I will rework the syntax. Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:59:50 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote:

Earl Chew wrote: > There is only one test to verify handling of harmonics of the filter table > sampling frequencies. Earl, I've had a couple of attempts to get this patch working, without luck. With this patch applied, when i run the test_metaflac.sh script, I get: Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: syntax error near unexpected token

Fix for padding with --replay-gain option. Ported from flac 1.2.1 maintenance branch: http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/flac/encode.c?r1=1.194&r2=1.194.2.1&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/flac/main.c?r1=1.169&r2=1.169.2.1&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH -------------- next part