similar to: Re: Odd xmms plugin behavior

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Re: Odd xmms plugin behavior"

2004 Sep 10
0
Fwd: Odd xmms plugin behavior
I'll be forwarding some posts from Matt since the list is blocking him out... --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:22:31 -0500 > From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> > To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Odd xmms plugin behavior > > While testing out the xmms plugin, I found that the 0.8 plugin would not play a >
2004 Sep 10
0
Re: Odd xmms plugin behavior
--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:09:51 -0500 > From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> > To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > CC: Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [Flac-dev] Re: Odd xmms plugin behavior > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:46:52AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > hmm, you must have found a
2004 Sep 10
0
Odd xmms plugin behavior
--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:46:52AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > hmm, you must have found a bug. the format does support other > > resolutions and sample rates, and the test suite does include > > numerous 8 bps mono files, so it's probably in the plugin itself. > > > > if you 'flac -t' the
2004 Sep 10
0
XMMS plugin build fix
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 03:13:31PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > Basically, you are allowed to specify object code, whether in shared or > > static libraries, normal object files, libtool libraries, and libtool > > object files. libtool figures out any magic that needs to be done to > > actually link those objects
2004 Sep 10
1
Mac OS X - xmms plugin probs
--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > I did not catch the beginning of this thread. What is the bug? > yeah, the thread's about a month old. you can see the whole thing here: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=738315&forum_id=6312 basically on OS X Ben's libtool is trying to "relink" libxmms-flac with the installed libFLAC before
2004 Sep 10
2
XMMS plugin build fix
--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > The only difference in the command lines seems to be that your > xmms-config > explicitly links with -lgthread, while I suppose mine lets the > dynamic linker > pull it in. The only significant difference between the old and new > _LIBADD > lines is that @XMMS_LIBS@ is at the beginning in the new one. Now > that I think
2004 Sep 10
3
[st.n@gmx.net: Bug#200435: xmms-flac: doesn't properly support long files]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:11:49PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:07:09AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > severity 200435 normal > > thanks > > > > I received this bug report from a Debian user. I can't think of any reason > > offhand why the command line tool would work while the xmms plugin would > > fail. > ... >
2004 Sep 10
0
Re: [st.n@gmx.net: Bug#200435: xmms-flac: doesn't properly support long files]
Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > I received this bug report from a Debian user. > Xmms-flac has problems with files longer than 55 minutes and 54 seconds. > It shows the files (and length) correctly in the playlist, but as soon as I > start playing such a file, the length kind of switches to 55:54. I can still > play these files completely, but the remaining
2004 Sep 10
0
Mac OS X - xmms plugin probs
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 05:15:17AM -0700, Ben Hines wrote: > On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 04:12 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > >Was this problem new in the 1.0.3 beta? My 1.0.2 packages do not have > >any such problem; I didn't notice any weirdness with 1.0.3beta, but the > >packages have probably only been built on my machine so far. > > How are you buildling
2004 Sep 10
1
Re: Bug#196556: flac: FLAC__STREAM_ENCODER_NOT_STREAMABLE
severity 196556 minor thanks On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 12:06:56PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:09:20PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > I ran a simple test to try to reproduce your problem, and I happened to grab > > one wav file which had a sampling rate of 4660 and was able to reproduce > > your problem. flac works fine on the other files, which
2004 Sep 10
0
[aottley@shaw.ca: Bug#203581: xmms-flac: Plugin misplays certain valid files]
----- Forwarded message from Adam Ottley <aottley@shaw.ca> ----- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 19:48:16 -0600 From: Adam Ottley <aottley@shaw.ca> Resent-From: Adam Ottley <aottley@shaw.ca> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: Bug#203581: xmms-flac: Plugin misplays certain valid files Package: xmms-flac Version: 1.1.0-9 Severity: normal Certain
2004 Sep 10
1
Segfaults on K7
--- Asheesh Laroia <PaulProteus@technologist.com> wrote: > I'm running your debian packages on a K7 currently. They seem to be > working fine, including the xmms-flac package. I seem to be > experiencing > the same flac decoding problems > (state=6:FLAC__FILE_DECODER_STREAM_ERROR) > as Pritpaul Mahal, however. I'll see if I can reproduce these. It > could
2004 Sep 10
0
Re: 0.9 problems
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:03:54PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > > 0.9. As I said, I was using an 8-bit sample, > > Ah, that didn't quite register with me. I'm using a CD-style > 44.1kHz/stereo/16-bit test file. I repeated my test with a 44.1kHz/stereo/16bit file. I get a floating point exception when
2004 Sep 10
0
XMMS plugin build fix
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:06:53PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > xmmsinputplugin_LTLIBRARIES = libxmms-flac.la > > libxmms_flac_la_SOURCES = plugin.c > > -libxmms_flac_la_LIBADD = -L$(top_builddir)/src/libFLAC/.libs -lFLAC > > @XMMS_LIBS@ > > +libxmms_flac_la_LIBADD = @XMMS_LIBS@ > > $(top_builddir)/src/libFLAC/libFLAC.la > > libxmms_flac_la_LDFLAGS =
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: xmms-flac problem
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:58:02PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > The best I can suggest is, run XMMS on repeat mode for a few hours. The > flac plugin will, if my setup isn't bizarre (it's just debian testing), > eventually give way. Just disable audio output or something, let it run > overnight, and see what state it's in in the morning. I'm sure the Oggs >
2004 Sep 10
0
Normalize?
--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:05:48 -0500 > From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> > To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > CC: Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [Flac-dev] Normalize? > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:39:32PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > --- "Jesse W. Hathaway"
2004 Sep 10
1
XMMS plugin build fix
I think I sent a bad patch for this one already, which used a _LIBS variable. There is no _LIBS variable. :-) So, the .la file should be specified directly in _LIBADD, with no linker flag syntax. libtool will figure it out. diff -u -r1.1.1.1 Makefile.am --- Makefile.am 29 Jan 2001 18:13:29 -0000 1.1.1.1 +++ Makefile.am 21 Jun 2001 19:27:31 -0000 @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@
2004 Sep 10
5
[st.n@gmx.net: Bug#200435: xmms-flac: doesn't properly support long files]
severity 200435 normal thanks I received this bug report from a Debian user. I can't think of any reason offhand why the command line tool would work while the xmms plugin would fail. ----- Forwarded message from Stephan Niemz <st.n@gmx.net> ----- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:24:57 +0200 From: Stephan Niemz <st.n@gmx.net> Resent-From: Stephan Niemz <st.n@gmx.net> To: Debian
2004 Sep 10
1
XMMS 1.2.6 package in debian breaks xmms-flac
This is mostly to Matt Zimmerman. The xmms package in unstable was updated to 1.2.6-1; that's fine. Then I noticed my XMMS would no longer play FLAC files. I run testing, not unstable, I thought. What could have happened? That change was propagated into testing without an xmms-flac update! Huh? This makes me wonder: xmms-flac 1.0.2-1 should depend on xmms = 1.2.5. I think because this
2004 Sep 10
2
Mac OS X - xmms plugin probs
On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 04:12 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote: >> > > Was this problem new in the 1.0.3 beta? My 1.0.2 packages do not have > any > such problem; I didn't notice any weirdness with 1.0.3beta, but the > packages > have probably only been built on my machine so far. > How are you buildling it? Do you use make install DESTDIR to build into your